本文選題：庭前證言筆錄 + 使用�。� 參考：《中國(guó)政法大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：在我國(guó)司法實(shí)踐中,證人不出庭現(xiàn)象十分普遍,要求每個(gè)案件中的每個(gè)證人都通過出庭作證的方式來提供證人證言不夠現(xiàn)實(shí)。庭前證言筆錄作為證人證言的一種重要表現(xiàn)方式,在證人不出庭作證的情形下,是對(duì)證人不出庭作證的一種有效彌補(bǔ),在證人出庭作證的情形下也可以與當(dāng)庭陳述很好的結(jié)合使用。文章從證人證言與庭前證言筆錄的概念辨析入手,探求兩者之間的關(guān)系,通過分析庭前證言筆錄的具體使用現(xiàn)狀,以及使用庭前證言筆錄的原因來首先肯定其存在的價(jià)值。通過分析實(shí)踐中使用庭前證言筆錄所存在的現(xiàn)實(shí)問題,從而提出規(guī)范庭前證言筆錄并對(duì)其進(jìn)行限制使用的具體措施。第一章主要介紹了證人證言與庭前證言筆錄,并對(duì)庭前證言筆錄的使用現(xiàn)狀作了分析。具體分情況探討了證人不出庭情況下庭前證言筆錄的使用和證人出庭情況下庭前證言筆錄的使用。在證人出庭的前提下又具體分析了證人庭前證言與當(dāng)庭陳述一致情形下庭前證言筆錄的使用和證人庭前證言與當(dāng)庭陳述不一致情形下庭前證言筆錄的使用問題。第二章分析了庭前證言筆錄使用的原因。首先分析了證言筆錄的證據(jù)能力問題并對(duì)其證據(jù)價(jià)值進(jìn)行了肯定,分析了我國(guó)刑事訴訟立法中關(guān)于證言筆錄證據(jù)能力的有關(guān)規(guī)定。著重從幾個(gè)方面分析了使用庭前證言筆錄的現(xiàn)實(shí)意義。庭前證言筆錄具有很強(qiáng)的可用性;庭前證言筆錄更易還原證人的記憶內(nèi)容;庭前證言筆錄受案外干擾因素較小;庭前證言筆錄提供的環(huán)境有利于證人作證;庭前證言筆錄具有訴訟經(jīng)濟(jì)價(jià)值。此外,本章還對(duì)國(guó)外關(guān)于證言筆錄的使用問題作了簡(jiǎn)單介紹,重點(diǎn)介紹了傳聞證據(jù)規(guī)則的例外及設(shè)置該例外的理由。第三章介紹了庭前證言筆錄使用的實(shí)踐問題。具體包括庭前證言筆錄的真實(shí)性難檢驗(yàn);庭前證言筆錄存在錯(cuò)誤信息的危險(xiǎn);使用庭前證言筆錄侵犯被告人的對(duì)質(zhì)權(quán)和影響法官辨識(shí)證人真意及其證言的可靠性等幾點(diǎn)現(xiàn)實(shí)問題。第四章是本文最為核心的部分即重點(diǎn)介紹了對(duì)證言筆錄的限制使用問題和如何更好的規(guī)范庭前證言筆錄的使用。首先應(yīng)當(dāng)從觀念上進(jìn)行轉(zhuǎn)變,要理性看待庭前證言筆錄。具體要轉(zhuǎn)變的觀念包括要正確理解現(xiàn)有的案卷移送制度;要設(shè)置符合我國(guó)實(shí)際的直接言詞原則;要科學(xué)認(rèn)識(shí)證言筆錄的證據(jù)能力。其次,在實(shí)踐中可以適當(dāng)借鑒吸收傳聞證據(jù)規(guī)則。緊接著,介紹了規(guī)范庭前證言筆錄使用的一些具體要求。包括規(guī)范證言筆錄的制作主體;規(guī)范證言筆錄形成的地點(diǎn)及方式;規(guī)范詢問證人的程序;規(guī)范證言筆錄的制作過程。最后分情況探討了如何對(duì)實(shí)踐中庭前證言筆錄的使用進(jìn)行規(guī)范和限制,簡(jiǎn)要分析了使用的規(guī)則和原則以及限制的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)。
[Abstract]:In the judicial practice of our country, the phenomenon that witnesses do not appear in court is very common, and it is not realistic to require each witness in every case to provide witness testimony through the way of testifying in court. As an important manifestation of witnesses' testimony, the record of pre-court testimony is an effective remedy for the failure of witnesses to testify in court. It can also be used in conjunction with a statement in court when a witness testifies in court. This article starts with the analysis of the concept of witness testimony and pre-court testimony record, probes into the relationship between them, and confirms its existence value by analyzing the current situation of the use of the pre-court testimony record and the reasons for the use of the pre-court testimony record. By analyzing the practical problems existing in the use of pretrial testimony in practice, this paper puts forward some concrete measures to regulate and restrict the use of pretrial testimony. The first chapter mainly introduces the witness testimony and pre-court testimony notes, and analyzes the current situation of the use of pre-court testimony notes. The paper discusses the use of the witness's pre-court testimony record and the witness's pre-court testimony record under the condition of the witness's failure to appear in court. On the premise of the witness appearing in court, the paper analyzes the use of the witness's pre-court testimony record and the use of the witness's pre-court testimony record under the condition that the witness's pre-court testimony is consistent with the in-court statement and the witness's pre-court testimony is inconsistent with the in-court statement. The second chapter analyzes the reasons for the use of pretrial testimony. At first, the paper analyzes the evidence ability of testimony record and affirms its value, and analyzes the relevant provisions about the evidence ability of testimony record in the criminal procedure legislation of our country. This paper analyzes the practical significance of the use of pretrial testimony from several aspects. The pre-court testimony record has strong usability, the pre-court testimony record is easier to restore the witness's memory content, the pre-court testimony record is less interfered by the factor outside the case, the environment provided by the pre-court testimony record is favorable for the witness to testify. The record of pre-trial testimony has the economic value of litigation. In addition, this chapter gives a brief introduction to the use of testimony records in foreign countries, focusing on the exception of hearsay evidence rule and the reasons for setting the exception. The third chapter introduces the practice of the use of pretrial testimony. In particular, it is difficult to test the authenticity of the pre-court testimony record, and the danger of false information exists in the pre-court testimony record. The use of pre-court testimony infringes upon the defendant's right to pledge and affects the judge's identification of the true meaning of the witness and the reliability of his testimony. The fourth chapter is the core part of this paper, which focuses on the restriction of the use of testimony records and how to better regulate the use of pre-court testimony records. First of all, we should change the concept and treat the record of pre-trial testimony rationally. The specific concepts to be changed include the correct understanding of the existing file transfer system, the establishment of the principle of direct words in line with the actual situation in our country, and the scientific understanding of the evidentiary capacity of the testimony record. Secondly, we can draw lessons from the rules of hearsay evidence in practice. Then, it introduces some specific requirements of regulating the use of pretrial testimony. It includes the main body of the standardized testimony record, the place and the way of the formation of the testimony record, the procedure of questioning the witness and the making process of the testimony record. Finally, it discusses how to regulate and restrict the use of pre-court testimony in practice, and briefly analyzes the rules and principles of use as well as the standards of limitation.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中國(guó)政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D925.2

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前6條

1 白冰;;論證言筆錄的證據(jù)能力[J];集寧師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2013年03期

2 汪貽飛;;論證言筆錄的證據(jù)能力[J];中國(guó)刑事法雜志;2009年08期

3 肖云鵬 ,郭萬山;證據(jù)文書節(jié)錄宣讀應(yīng)保持原話原意[J];河北法學(xué);1987年05期

4 應(yīng)建廷;二審?fù)徥咀C責(zé)任辨析[J];中國(guó)刑事法雜志;1999年03期

5 熊繼前;鄭大群;;單位能否充當(dāng)證人提供證言[J];政治與法律;1985年05期

6 ;[J];;年期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前1條

1 向繼武;誠信演繹精彩人生[N];恩施日?qǐng)?bào);2009年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 陳曼;刑事證言筆錄使用規(guī)則研究[D];南京師范大學(xué);2016年

2 范淑婷;庭前證言筆錄的使用及其限制[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2017年

3 李永宏;我國(guó)刑事法庭證人作證的問題與完善[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2011年

，

本文編號(hào)：1875063