本文選題：警察 + 出庭作證　； 參考：《青島大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：警察出庭作證是指,在法庭審判過程中,如果刑事案件被告人及其辯護(hù)人對(duì)偵查行為的合法性及通過偵查取得的證據(jù)的合法性有異議時(shí),警察應(yīng)該以控方證人的身份出庭作證,就對(duì)案件實(shí)施訊問、搜查、扣押、勘驗(yàn)、檢查等偵查行為進(jìn)行陳述或接受詢問,以便法官了解案件事實(shí),決定警察偵查過程取得的證據(jù)是否具有可采性等。 警察出庭作證,在英美法系國家是一種理所當(dāng)然的情形,警察為了自己辛苦得來的證據(jù)不被法庭排除,通常會(huì)以控方證人的身份出庭接受詢問。在大陸法系國家,雖然警察出庭作證制度通常沒有法律的明文規(guī)定,理論上也并不認(rèn)同將警察劃分在證人范圍內(nèi),但在司法實(shí)踐中,還有很多國家存在警察出庭作證的情形。在我國,理論界長期不認(rèn)同警察以證人的身份出庭作證。2010年司法解釋《關(guān)于辦理刑事案件排除非法證據(jù)若干問題的規(guī)定》出臺(tái)后,初步明確了警察可以以證人的身份出庭作證,這是理論界的一大進(jìn)步,但在司法實(shí)踐中,因?yàn)榕c警察出庭作證制度配套的司法體系并沒有完善,因此警察不出庭作證仍然是普遍情形。 警察出庭作證對(duì)刑事案件的公正審判具有重要意義,警察是否出庭作證可能影響到偵查階段獲取的證據(jù)是否可以采用,從而與刑事案件被告人的人身權(quán)利有密切關(guān)系。因此,完善我國的警察出庭作證制度,是司法實(shí)踐中一件急需解決的問題。
[Abstract]:During the trial, if the defendant and his defenders in a criminal case object to the legality of the investigation and the legality of the evidence obtained through the investigation, the police should testify in court as a witness for the prosecution. In order to understand the facts of the case and decide whether the evidence obtained during the police investigation is admissible or not, the author states or receives inquiries about the investigation behavior of the case, such as interrogation, search, seizure, investigation, inspection and so on. It is a natural situation for the police to testify in the common law system. The police are not excluded by the court for their hard-earned evidence, and they usually appear in court as prosecution witnesses. In civil law countries, although the system of police appearing in court usually does not have the explicit stipulation of law and does not agree to divide the police into witnesses in theory, but in the judicial practice, there are still many countries where the police appear in court to testify. In our country, the theorists have long disapproved that the police can testify in court as a witness. After the introduction of the 2010 judicial interpretation on the exclusion of some illegal evidence in criminal cases, it is preliminarily clear that the police can testify in court as a witness. This is a great progress in the field of theory, but in judicial practice, because the judicial system supporting the system of police appearing in court is not perfect, it is still a common situation for the police not to testify in court. It is of great significance for the police to testify in court for the fair trial of criminal cases. Whether the police testify in court or not may affect whether the evidence obtained in the investigation stage can be used, which is closely related to the personal rights of the defendants in criminal cases. Therefore, it is an urgent problem in judicial practice to perfect the system of police testifying in court in our country.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：青島大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D925.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前6條

1 龐國權(quán);;警察作證:刑事證據(jù)制度改革的突破點(diǎn)?[J];中國社會(huì)導(dǎo)刊;2006年04期

2 自正法;;證人出庭作證制度完善之初探[J];全國商情(經(jīng)濟(jì)理論研究);2013年13期

3 汪建成,楊雄;警察作證制度的理論推演與實(shí)證分析[J];政法論壇;2003年04期

4 喬漢榮,鄧明仁,朱春莉;構(gòu)建偵查人員出庭作證制度相關(guān)問題研究[J];國家檢察官學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2004年02期

5 馬嘉;李海偉;;論我國警察出庭作證制度的構(gòu)建[J];中國-東盟博覽;2012年07期

6 胡煒;;論新刑事訴訟法下警察出庭作證制度[J];現(xiàn)代物業(yè)(中旬刊);2013年07期

，

本文編號(hào)：1870061