本文選題：特別沒收 + 檢察權(quán)力�。� 參考：《華東政法大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：2012年3月份我國進(jìn)行了《刑事訴訟法》的修正，在特別程序中新增了“違法所得沒收程序”。該程序的設(shè)立是在多樣化和新穎化犯罪伎倆不斷涌現(xiàn)，同時司法機(jī)關(guān)追繳涉腐、涉恐等重大案件中違法所得越來越難的大背景下產(chǎn)生的，對此，該程序的設(shè)立毫無疑問是我國法制發(fā)展史上又一個重要的里程碑。 然而，該新增程序目前來講只有簡單的幾個法律條文，幾百余字，對于該項程序中檢察機(jī)關(guān)權(quán)力的規(guī)定更是直接涵蓋到那幾個條文之中�；诋�(dāng)前缺乏系統(tǒng)完備、內(nèi)容健全的檢察權(quán)力運行機(jī)制，導(dǎo)致了我國不少學(xué)界和實務(wù)界的工作者都不由自主地開始擔(dān)憂該項程序中檢察權(quán)力能否保持平穩(wěn)、健康運行。對此，，為了正面回應(yīng)這些顧慮，本文在吸收前人研究成果的基礎(chǔ)上，嘗試對我國違法所得沒收程序中的檢察權(quán)力進(jìn)行系統(tǒng)的分析、整理和研究,并試圖探索一條完善我國該程序中檢察權(quán)力運行的具體路徑，以期實現(xiàn)本文之寫作目的。 具體來看，除去導(dǎo)言和結(jié)語，本論文的結(jié)構(gòu)主要分為三大部分： 第一部分違法所得沒收程序的概述 該部分首先從法律規(guī)范之間關(guān)聯(lián)性的角度出發(fā)，分析我國違法所得沒收程序設(shè)立的歷史演進(jìn)和該程序在整個沒收體系中的定位；其次，立足我國當(dāng)前對該程序的法律規(guī)定，并在此基礎(chǔ)上力圖概括該程序的法律含義。最后，結(jié)合我國司法實踐發(fā)展的客觀需求，并從四個維度出發(fā)探究該程序設(shè)立的重大意義。 第二部分違法所得沒收程序中檢察權(quán)力運行的現(xiàn)狀研究 該部分通過從宏觀層面概述我國檢察權(quán)力的運行以及從微觀層面介紹我國違法所得沒收程序中檢察權(quán)力的運行特點，并在此基礎(chǔ)上指出我國目前該程序中檢察權(quán)力運行存在的問題和弊端。 第三部分違法所得沒收程序中檢察權(quán)力運行的完善 該部分通過從比較法的視角來研究域外德國和美國的特別沒收模式的特點，分析其模式對于規(guī)范我國該程序中檢察權(quán)力運行的啟示，并結(jié)合我國的國情，最終試圖探索一條完善我國違法所得沒收程序中檢察權(quán)力運行的具體路徑。
[Abstract]:In March 2012, China amended the Criminal procedure Law and added "illegal income confiscation procedure" to the special procedure. The establishment of this procedure is taking place against the background of the increasing variety and novelty of criminal tactics and the increasing difficulty of the judicial authorities in recovering illegal proceeds in major cases, such as corruption and terrorism. The establishment of this procedure is undoubtedly another important milestone in the history of the legal development of our country. However, at present, the new procedure has only a few simple legal provisions, hundreds of words, and the provisions on the powers of procuratorial organs in this procedure are directly covered in those articles. Due to the lack of a complete system and sound operating mechanism of procuratorial power, many scholars and practitioners in our country begin to worry about whether the procuratorial power in this procedure can be maintained smoothly and healthily. In order to respond positively to these concerns, this paper attempts to systematically analyze, collate and study the procuratorial power in the procedure of confiscation of illegal income on the basis of absorbing the previous research results. It also tries to explore a specific path to improve the operation of procuratorial power in this procedure in order to achieve the purpose of writing this paper. Specifically, apart from the introduction and conclusion, the structure of this paper is divided into three parts: Part I Summary of confiscation procedure of illegal income This part first analyzes the historical evolution of the establishment of the illegal income confiscation procedure and its orientation in the whole confiscation system from the angle of the correlation between the legal norms, and secondly, based on the current legal provisions of the procedure in our country, it analyzes the historical evolution of the establishment of the illegal income confiscation procedure and the orientation of the procedure in the whole confiscation system. And on this basis try to generalize the legal meaning of the procedure. Finally, according to the objective needs of the development of judicial practice in China, and from the four dimensions to explore the significance of the establishment of the procedure. The second part: the Research on the current situation of Procuratorial Power in the procedure of confiscation of illegal income This part introduces the operation characteristics of procuratorial power in the procedure of confiscation of illegal income from the macro level and the micro level. On this basis, the author points out the problems and drawbacks of the procuratorial power operation in our country. The third part the improvement of the operation of procuratorial power in the procedure of confiscation of illegal income This part studies the characteristics of the special confiscation mode in Germany and the United States from the perspective of comparative law, analyzes the enlightenment of the mode to regulate the operation of procuratorial power in this procedure in our country, and combines the national conditions of our country. Finally, it attempts to explore a specific path to improve the operation of procuratorial power in the procedure of confiscation of illegal income in China.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D925.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前6條

1 萬毅;;獨立沒收程序的證據(jù)法難題及其破解[J];法學(xué);2012年04期

2 何正華;;沒收潛逃、死亡涉案人員違法所得幾個程序問題探討[J];法治論壇;2011年04期

3 吳志華;;淺論貪官引渡問題[J];法制與社會;2008年25期

4 姚嘉偉;;違法所得沒收程序的檢察思考[J];福建警察學(xué)院學(xué)報;2013年03期

5 熊秋紅;;從特別沒收程序的性質(zhì)看制度完善[J];法學(xué);2013年09期

6 亢晶晶;;美國民事沒收制度的啟示——兼評新《刑事訴訟法》中違法所得的沒收程序[J];上海公安高等�？茖W(xué)校學(xué)報;2012年06期

本文編號：1869911