本文選題：訴前委托調(diào)解 + 人民調(diào)解�。� 參考：《廣東財經(jīng)大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：隨著經(jīng)濟(jì)的發(fā)展，糾紛方式越來越多樣化，我國各地法院不斷出現(xiàn)“訴訟爆炸”，用訴前委托調(diào)解方式解決糾紛是把案件解決在法院立案之前，其一定程度上減少了進(jìn)入訴訟程序的案件，因此其紛紛被各地法院以各種形式實踐。但我國法律對此沒有明確的規(guī)定，，因此對其研究具有很大的理論意義和現(xiàn)實意義。本文主要分四章，各章的內(nèi)容分別如下： 第一章主要介紹訴前委托調(diào)解的基本理論。對訴前委托調(diào)解的概念、性質(zhì)、功能、特征進(jìn)行詳細(xì)的介紹。并將訴前委托調(diào)解與幾個容易混淆的概念進(jìn)行了比較，為下文我國訴前委托調(diào)解的構(gòu)建奠定基礎(chǔ)。 第二章是介紹國外及臺灣地區(qū)的在構(gòu)建我國訴前委托調(diào)解時值得借鑒的調(diào)解制度。主要介紹了美國、日本及我國臺灣地區(qū)的調(diào)解制度，通過比較分析，總結(jié)出值得我國構(gòu)建訴前委托調(diào)解制度的借鑒的做法。 第三章對我國委托調(diào)解制度的現(xiàn)狀包括立法方面和司法方面及存在的問題，本文重點介紹我國現(xiàn)階段主要的四種司法實踐類型：“人民調(diào)解窗口”型、“訴調(diào)聯(lián)合”型、“特邀調(diào)解員”型、“基層組織、專業(yè)機(jī)構(gòu)”型。并指出訴前委托調(diào)解存在主要的問題。 第四章是提出我國訴前委托調(diào)解制度的構(gòu)想，該方案的主要內(nèi)容包括訴前委托調(diào)解的原則、調(diào)解范圍、調(diào)解主體的確認(rèn)、調(diào)解的程序及調(diào)解保障等方面。
[Abstract]:With the development of economy, the dispute forms are becoming more and more diversified. Courts in various parts of our country constantly appear "lawsuit explosion". To solve the dispute by entrusting mediation before litigation is to settle the case before the court files the case. To a certain extent, it reduces the number of cases entered into the proceedings, so it has been practiced in various forms by various courts. However, there is no clear stipulation on this in our country's law, so it has great theoretical and practical significance to study it. This paper is divided into four chapters, the contents of each chapter are as follows: The first chapter mainly introduces the basic theory of entrustment mediation before litigation. This paper introduces the concept, nature, function and characteristics of pre-litigation commission mediation in detail. In addition, the author compares the prelitigation entrustment mediation with several confusing concepts, and lays a foundation for the construction of prelitigation entrustment mediation in our country. The second chapter introduces the mediation system in foreign countries and Taiwan, which can be used for reference when entrusting mediation before litigation in our country. This paper mainly introduces the mediation system of the United States, Japan and Taiwan area of our country. Through the comparative analysis, it sums up the practice that our country should use for reference to construct the mediation system of entrustment before litigation. The third chapter mainly introduces four types of judicial practice: "people's mediation window" type, "suit and adjust joint" type, the third chapter mainly introduces the current situation of China's entrusted mediation system, including legislative and judicial aspects and existing problems. "invited mediators" type, "grassroots organizations, professional institutions" type. It also points out that there are main problems in entrusting mediation before litigation. The fourth chapter is to put forward the concept of pre-litigation entrusted mediation system in our country. The main contents of this scheme include the principle of pre-litigation entrusted mediation, the scope of mediation, the confirmation of the mediation subject, the procedure of mediation and the mediation guarantee and so on.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：廣東財經(jīng)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D925.14

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 張曉茹;;構(gòu)建中國強(qiáng)制調(diào)解制度的必要性和可行性——評《民事訴訟法》修正案草案第122條[J];民間法;2012年00期

本文編號：1869461