發(fā)布時間：2018-05-06 14:52

  本文選題：給付訴訟 + 受案范圍��； 參考：《法律適用》2017年19期

【摘要】：我國現(xiàn)行《行政訴訟法》對于給付訴訟受案范圍的列舉式規(guī)定過于狹窄,概括式規(guī)定又過于抽象,難以全面涵蓋日益多元化的行政給付爭議,司法實踐中超越給付訴訟受案范圍列舉式規(guī)定的情況又過于雜亂、難成體系,而在理論層面對給付訴訟類型化研究亦未能深入和成形。因此,必須從理論和實踐上完善我國給付訴訟受案范圍。本文認為,厘清給付訴訟的受案范圍,首先需要明確給付訴訟的基本概念及其在訴訟類型中的地位和作用、與其他類型訴訟的界限。文章從財產(chǎn)給付之訴和非財產(chǎn)給付之訴受案范圍的完善以及給付請求權基礎的審查規(guī)則三個方面闡述了我國給付訴訟受案范圍在具體制度層面的改進方向。
[Abstract]:The current Administrative Litigation Law of our country is too narrow in enumeration and abstract in the scope of accepting cases, and it is difficult to fully cover the disputes of increasingly diversified administrative payment. In judicial practice, it is too messy and difficult to form a systematic situation which transcends the enumerative provisions of the scope of accepting cases of payment litigation, and the research on the type of litigation of payment in the theoretical level has not been deepened and formed. Therefore, we must improve the scope of litigation cases in theory and practice. This paper holds that to clarify the scope of cases of payment litigation, we should first clarify the basic concept of payment litigation, its status and role in the type of litigation, and the boundary between the litigation and other types of litigation. This paper expounds the direction of improvement of the scope of litigation for payment of property in China from three aspects: the perfection of the scope of litigation and the examination rules of the basis of the right of claim for payment of property and non-property.
【作者單位】： 北京市第二中級人民法院行政審判庭;中國政法大學;
【分類號】：D925.3

【相似文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 凌鴻;論少年法庭的受案范圍[J];青少年犯罪問題;2002年02期

2 高曉樓;;淺談公益訴訟的受案范圍[J];山西煤炭管理干部學院學報;2006年02期

3 祝儒偉;;論擴大仲裁受案范圍的積極作用[J];法制與社會;2008年03期

4 王國存;;網(wǎng)絡法庭受案范圍初探[J];電腦知識與技術;2008年26期

5 劉云峰;袁功輝;;司法審查介入高校學生管理的受案范圍研究[J];科技信息;2009年22期

6 劉光華;馬潔娜;;論仲裁受案范圍的適時、適度擴展[J];仲裁研究;2009年02期

7 黃學賢;梁s，

本文編號：1852745