本文選題：憲法 + 權(quán)利　； 參考：《內(nèi)蒙古大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：律師在構(gòu)建和諧社會(huì)中起著舉足輕重的作用,也是依法治國(guó)、依憲治國(guó)的重要力量。而律師權(quán)利又是律師依法正確履行職責(zé)、保障司法公正、維護(hù)當(dāng)事人合法權(quán)益的必要條件。近年來,國(guó)家相繼出臺(tái)相關(guān)規(guī)定保障律師的執(zhí)業(yè)權(quán)利,然而效果并不明顯,實(shí)踐可操作性不佳,我國(guó)執(zhí)業(yè)律師的權(quán)利并沒有得到良好的保障,本文在此基礎(chǔ)上找出了我國(guó)律師權(quán)利保障不足的原因并對(duì)其進(jìn)行分析,提出改善之道。本論文主要研究的是律師的執(zhí)業(yè)權(quán)利,對(duì)于律師自身權(quán)益的保障實(shí)質(zhì)上是對(duì)其執(zhí)業(yè)權(quán)利保障的前提和結(jié)果,并非本文研究的核心和重點(diǎn)。本論文對(duì)我國(guó)律師權(quán)利保障制度的研究共分為四章:第一章:律師權(quán)利保障制度概述。通過對(duì)律師權(quán)利的介紹,系統(tǒng)的認(rèn)識(shí)到我們國(guó)家的律師在執(zhí)業(yè)過程中享有哪些權(quán)利;通過對(duì)律師權(quán)利與公民權(quán)利關(guān)系的闡述,了解保障律師執(zhí)業(yè)權(quán)利對(duì)于保障公民基本權(quán)利的意義;通過對(duì)律師權(quán)利與我國(guó)法治建設(shè)的關(guān)系概括,將律師權(quán)利保障上升到人權(quán)保障的高度上來,推進(jìn)中國(guó)特色社會(huì)主義民主法治的建設(shè)。介紹我國(guó)律師權(quán)利保障制度的發(fā)展變遷,了解我國(guó)律師制度的歷史背景,為下文分析原因提供依據(jù)。第二章:國(guó)外律師權(quán)利保障的分析、借鑒。分別闡述英美法系和大陸法系的幾個(gè)代表性國(guó)家的律師權(quán)利保障狀況,并且進(jìn)行對(duì)比分析,找出我國(guó)律師權(quán)利保障制度與國(guó)外律師權(quán)利保障制度存在的差距,進(jìn)而對(duì)我國(guó)律師權(quán)利保障制度的完善提供有益的借鑒和參考。第三章:我國(guó)律師權(quán)利保障制度的現(xiàn)狀及保障不足的原因分析。首先從理論和實(shí)踐兩個(gè)方面對(duì)《關(guān)于依法保障律師執(zhí)業(yè)權(quán)利的規(guī)定》進(jìn)行解讀,然后闡述我國(guó)律師權(quán)利保障的現(xiàn)狀,并指出現(xiàn)階段我國(guó)律師權(quán)利保障制度上的不足,最后分析了保障不足的原因,以便于解決。第四章:完善我國(guó)律師權(quán)利保障制度。從制度層面上對(duì)我國(guó)律師權(quán)利保障制度進(jìn)行完善。首先公民應(yīng)增強(qiáng)憲法意識(shí),構(gòu)建中國(guó)特色社會(huì)主義的法律文化;然后通過立法來支撐律師權(quán)利的保障:完善律師權(quán)利保障方面的規(guī)定,建立律師權(quán)利救濟(jì)機(jī)制;接著在司法層面上來對(duì)律師權(quán)利進(jìn)行保障:構(gòu)建法律職業(yè)共同體,提高法官、檢察官的綜合素質(zhì);最后通過改善律師執(zhí)業(yè)環(huán)境,提高律師自身素質(zhì)來對(duì)律師權(quán)利保障制度進(jìn)行完善。結(jié)論部分,進(jìn)一步強(qiáng)調(diào)律師權(quán)利保障的現(xiàn)實(shí)性和必要性,是構(gòu)建中國(guó)特色社會(huì)主義法治國(guó)家的重要內(nèi)容,并借鑒國(guó)外經(jīng)驗(yàn)完善我國(guó)的律師權(quán)利保障制度。
[Abstract]:Lawyers play an important role in the construction of a harmonious society and are also an important force in governing the country according to the law and governing the country according to the constitution. The lawyer's right is the necessary condition for the lawyer to perform his duties correctly, to guarantee the justice of justice and to safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of the litigants. In recent years, the state has issued related regulations to protect lawyers' right to practice. However, the effect is not obvious, the practice is not operable well, and the rights of practicing lawyers in our country have not been well protected. On this basis, this paper finds out the reasons for the inadequate protection of lawyers' rights in our country, analyzes it and puts forward some ways to improve it. This paper mainly studies the lawyer's right of practice, and the protection of the lawyer's own rights and interests is the premise and result of the protection of the lawyer's right of practice in essence, and is not the core and focus of this paper. The research of this thesis is divided into four chapters: chapter one: Overview of lawyer's right guarantee system. Through the introduction of lawyers' rights, we systematically recognize what rights lawyers in our country enjoy in the course of their practice; through the elaboration of the relationship between lawyers' rights and civil rights, To understand the significance of safeguarding lawyers' right to practice for the protection of citizens' fundamental rights; to raise the protection of lawyers' rights to the height of human rights protection by summarizing the relationship between lawyers' rights and the construction of the rule of law in China. We will promote the construction of socialist democracy and the rule of law with Chinese characteristics. This paper introduces the development and vicissitude of the lawyer's right guarantee system in our country, understands the historical background of the lawyer's system in our country, and provides the basis for the analysis of the reasons below. The second chapter: the analysis of the foreign lawyer's right safeguard, draw lessons from. In this paper, the author expatiates on the protection of lawyers' rights in several representative countries of Anglo-American law system and civil law system, and makes a comparative analysis to find out the gap between China's lawyer's right guarantee system and foreign lawyer's right guarantee system. Then it provides useful reference and reference for the perfection of our lawyer's right guarantee system. Chapter three: the analysis of the current situation and the reasons of the lack of the guarantee system of lawyers' rights in our country. First of all, it interprets the regulations on protecting lawyers' right to practise according to law from two aspects of theory and practice, then expounds the current situation of the protection of lawyers' rights in our country, and points out the deficiencies in the system of safeguarding the rights of lawyers in our country at the present stage. At last, the paper analyzes the reasons of insufficient protection, so as to solve the problem easily. The fourth chapter: perfect our country lawyer right safeguard system. From the system level, we perfect our lawyer's right guarantee system. Firstly, citizens should strengthen their constitutional consciousness and construct the legal culture of socialism with Chinese characteristics, and then support the protection of lawyers' rights through legislation: perfecting the provisions of lawyers' rights protection and establishing the relief mechanism of lawyers' rights; Then in the judicial level to protect the rights of lawyers: to build a legal professional community, improve the comprehensive quality of judges and prosecutors; finally, through improving the lawyer practice environment, Improve the quality of lawyers to improve the protection system of lawyers' rights. In conclusion, it is an important content to construct a socialist country ruled by law with Chinese characteristics to further emphasize the reality and necessity of the protection of lawyers' rights, and to perfect the protection system of lawyers' rights in our country by using foreign experience for reference.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：內(nèi)蒙古大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D926.5

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 梁仁偉;律師權(quán)利的問題與保護(hù)對(duì)策[J];學(xué)術(shù)論壇;2003年05期

2 林鴻;律師權(quán)利保障若干問題思考[J];福建政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2004年04期

3 曲濤;;英國(guó)律師權(quán)利保障制度初探[J];法制與社會(huì);2009年16期

4 陳鉞鋒;;中國(guó)的律師權(quán)利保護(hù)[J];價(jià)值工程;2010年07期

5 屈凱;;簡(jiǎn)析當(dāng)代對(duì)律師權(quán)利的保護(hù)[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)研究導(dǎo)刊;2010年27期

6 陳為國(guó);;淺議中國(guó)律師權(quán)利的現(xiàn)狀及律師權(quán)利制度的構(gòu)建[J];全國(guó)商情(理論研究);2012年11期

7 朱洪超;提前辯護(hù)后的律師權(quán)利與義務(wù)[J];政治與法律;1996年02期

8 賈寶平;;傳統(tǒng)文化與我國(guó)律師權(quán)利[J];考試周刊;2007年13期

9 孟穗;汪洋;;影響我國(guó)律師權(quán)利的若干因素分析[J];中國(guó)市場(chǎng);2008年13期

10 曲濤;;我國(guó)香港特別行政區(qū)律師權(quán)利保障制度初探[J];法制與社會(huì);2009年23期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前1條

1 李仁廳;林志清;;律師權(quán)利的界定和保障[A];第四屆中國(guó)律師論壇百篇優(yōu)秀論文集[C];2004年

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前10條

1 嚴(yán)怡娜 本報(bào)記者 孔愛群;法官律師權(quán)利義務(wù)有了明確界定[N];遼寧日?qǐng)?bào);2014年

2 楊濤;尊重人權(quán)從保障律師權(quán)利開始[N];法制日?qǐng)?bào);2013年

3 記者 李軒甫 通訊員 邢姑;海南：切實(shí)保障律師權(quán)利[N];檢察日?qǐng)?bào);2013年

4 張鵬 徐鵬;律師權(quán)利修改對(duì)自偵工作的影響[N];江蘇法制報(bào);2014年

5 王比學(xué);呼吁加強(qiáng)律師權(quán)利保護(hù)[N];人民日?qǐng)?bào);2007年

6 中央民族大學(xué)法學(xué)院　安紹偉（德恒杯有獎(jiǎng)?wù)魑娜泉?jiǎng)獲得者）;中國(guó)法治發(fā)展與律師權(quán)利保障[N];法制日?qǐng)?bào);2003年

7 王春霞 執(zhí)業(yè)律師;律師權(quán)利應(yīng)當(dāng)實(shí)現(xiàn)法律救濟(jì)[N];東莞日?qǐng)?bào);2014年

8 朱磊;應(yīng)設(shè)立律師權(quán)利救濟(jì)程序[N];法制日?qǐng)?bào);2007年

9 通訊員 艾永強(qiáng);重慶沙坪壩：多措并舉保障律師權(quán)利[N];檢察日?qǐng)?bào);2009年

10 劉波;保障律師權(quán)利是普遍保障人權(quán)的重要基礎(chǔ)[N];經(jīng)濟(jì)觀察報(bào);2008年

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 龍?jiān)戚x;律師權(quán)利研究[D];重慶大學(xué);2008年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前8條

1 荊亞斌;我國(guó)律師權(quán)利保障制度完善研究[D];山西大學(xué);2016年

2 宋倩;我國(guó)律師權(quán)利保障制度研究[D];內(nèi)蒙古大學(xué);2017年

3 巴曉寧;能動(dòng)型國(guó)家司法程序視野下的我國(guó)律師權(quán)利研究[D];遼寧師范大學(xué);2011年

4 呂蕾;新律師法律師權(quán)利制度研究[D];西南政法大學(xué);2009年

5 宋敏慧;刑事律師權(quán)利現(xiàn)狀的分析[D];蘭州大學(xué);2012年

6 尚西國(guó);憲政視野下的律師權(quán)利研究[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2006年

7 常超;刑事訴訟中律師權(quán)利保障制度研究[D];山西大學(xué);2009年

8 邱飛;論偵查程序中律師權(quán)利的完善[D];青島大學(xué);2009年

，

本文編號(hào)：1834314