本文選題：變更判決 + 司法公正��； 參考：《廣西民族大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：變更判決是我國行政訴訟重要的判決形式之一,是司法機(jī)關(guān)監(jiān)督行政機(jī)關(guān)依法行政的重要手段。改革開放以來,我國《行政訴訟法》立法取得舉世矚目的成績,但也必須承認(rèn),我國《行政訴訟法》在具體制度設(shè)計上仍有不盡人意之處。行政訴訟變更判決在我國立法和制度方面都有相應(yīng)規(guī)定,但不夠完善,司法實踐中也存在變更判決的適用范圍窄,適用率低,司法審判受行政權(quán)影響等問題,不能發(fā)揮出其應(yīng)有價值�！缎姓V訟法》修改之后,進(jìn)一步完善了相關(guān)立法,擴(kuò)展了行政訴訟變更判決的適用范圍,增加了禁止不利變更的原則,在一定程度上解決了存在的問題,對于保障行政相對人的合法權(quán)益,提高訴訟效益方面均具有極大的進(jìn)步意義。在肯定修改后的《行政訴訟法》進(jìn)步的同時,結(jié)合我國的司法實踐,客觀分析把握新法規(guī)定,分析其還存在的問題和問題產(chǎn)生的原因,并有針對性的提出解決問題的對策,對進(jìn)一步完善我國的行政訴訟變更判決制度也是十分必要的。文章提出完善行政訴訟變更判決立法,同時完善相關(guān)配套制度,變更判決的受案范圍不應(yīng)束縛于實體權(quán)利領(lǐng)域,可向程序性領(lǐng)域發(fā)展的建議和構(gòu)想。希望能對我國行政訴訟變更判決制度的完善和相關(guān)理論創(chuàng)新有所幫助。文章結(jié)構(gòu)分為緒論、正文和結(jié)語三個部分。其中正文分為四章,第一章為變更判決的基礎(chǔ)理論,概述了變更判決的概念和特征、變更判決的發(fā)展和變遷;第二章對變更判決在我國行政訴訟體系中的地位和評價進(jìn)行分析,突出變更判決的立法現(xiàn)狀及其在司法實踐中的適用標(biāo)準(zhǔn);第三章對變更判決的適用基本情況,存在的問題和問題產(chǎn)生的原因進(jìn)行分析;第四章是文章的重點,主要總結(jié)了修法后法官在司法實踐中適用變更判決應(yīng)當(dāng)把握的一些問題,并針對上述問題,提出完善我國行政訴訟變更判決的一些建議和制度構(gòu)想。
[Abstract]:Changing judgment is one of the important forms of administrative litigation in our country, and it is also an important means for judicial organs to supervise the administration of administrative organs according to law. Since the reform and opening up, the legislation of the Administrative Litigation Law in our country has made remarkable achievements, but it must also be acknowledged that the concrete system design of the Administrative procedure Law of our country is still unsatisfactory. There are corresponding provisions in our legislation and system, but they are not perfect. In judicial practice, there are some problems such as narrow scope of application, low rate of application, judicial trial influenced by administrative power, etc. After the revision of the "Administrative Litigation Law", the relevant legislation has been further improved, the scope of application of the administrative procedural change judgment has been expanded, and the principle of prohibiting adverse changes has been added. To a certain extent, the existing problems are solved, which is of great significance in protecting the legitimate rights and interests of the administrative counterpart and improving the benefit of litigation. While affirming the progress of the revised Administrative Litigation Law, combining the judicial practice of our country, this paper objectively analyzes and grasps the provisions of the new law, analyzes its existing problems and the causes of the problems, and puts forward targeted countermeasures to solve the problems. It is also necessary to improve the system of administrative litigation change judgment in our country. This paper puts forward some suggestions and ideas that the legislation of administrative litigation should be improved, and the relevant supporting system should be perfected. The scope of accepting cases of changing judgment should not be bound to the field of substantive rights, but can be developed into procedural field. It is hoped that it will be helpful to the improvement of the system of changing judgment in administrative litigation and the innovation of relevant theories. The structure of the article is divided into three parts: introduction, text and conclusion. The text is divided into four chapters. The first chapter is the basic theory of the modified judgment, which summarizes the concept and characteristics of the modified judgment, the development and changes of the modified judgment, and the second chapter analyzes the status and evaluation of the modified judgment in the administrative litigation system of our country. Highlight the legislative situation of changing judgment and its applicable standards in judicial practice; the third chapter analyzes the basic situation of the application of the modified judgment, the existing problems and the causes of the problems; the fourth chapter is the focus of the article, This paper summarizes some problems that judges should grasp in applying the modified judgment in the judicial practice, and puts forward some suggestions and system ideas to perfect the modified judgment of administrative litigation in our country.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：廣西民族大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D925.3

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 程丹丹;;行政訴訟司法變更權(quán)的新發(fā)展——兼評《行政訴訟法》第77條之規(guī)定[J];安徽行政學(xué)院學(xué)報;2015年05期

2 滕亞為;康勇;;論行政訴訟變更判決的適用范圍——兼評新《行政訴訟法》第70條[J];重慶理工大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué));2015年10期

3 張靜;;論行政訴訟變更判決[J];行政法學(xué)研究;2015年02期

4 董琪;林哲;;我國行政判決種類的透視、反思與前瞻[J];成都行政學(xué)院學(xué)報;2015年01期

5 尹洪陽;;司法審查之“變更權(quán)”制度探討[J];法律適用;2014年08期

6 劉涵;;行政訴訟重作判決必要性再探討[J];泰山學(xué)院學(xué)報;2014年04期

7 陳國富;;馬克思主義視域下的中國特色社會主義公平正義實踐[J];理論導(dǎo)刊;2013年08期

8 李鵬;;論房屋拆遷行政裁決訴訟案件中司法變更權(quán)的引入[J];行政與法;2013年06期

9 鄧剛宏;;我國行政訴訟訴判關(guān)系的新認(rèn)識[J];中國法學(xué);2012年05期

10 張書豪;;論司法過程的不確定[J];理論與現(xiàn)代化;2012年02期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 吳殊;行政權(quán)干預(yù)司法權(quán)研究[D];內(nèi)蒙古大學(xué);2011年

2 孫元明;論我國行政訴訟制度的不足及完善[D];安徽大學(xué);2005年

，

本文編號：1834420