本文選題：違法所得 + 沒收程序�。� 參考：《外交學院》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：作為世界上第一部指導國際反腐敗斗爭的法律文件，《聯(lián)合國反腐敗公約》的通過對各國加強國內(nèi)的反腐行動、提高反腐成效、促進反腐敗國際合作具有重要的意義。尤其是該《公約》第五章“資產(chǎn)的追回機制”中明確規(guī)定了沒收腐敗犯罪所得制度。該程序的設置不僅解決了在犯罪人嫌疑人、被告人在死亡、潛逃或者缺席而無法對其起訴的情形下，能夠不經(jīng)刑事定罪而沒收腐敗犯罪所得，最大限度的追回腐敗犯罪所得的問題，而且該制度的設置還順應了當前國際社會反腐、反恐的形勢，為各國追回腐敗犯罪所得提供了依據(jù)。 中國作為《公約》的締約國，基于《公約》的規(guī)定，在2012年新修訂的《刑事訴訟法》中增設了“違法所得特別沒收程序”。該程序的設置順應了當前國際、國內(nèi)反腐、反恐的形勢，是完善中國刑事訴訟法律體系，履行《公約》基本義務的要求。同時，該程序的設置兼顧了嚴懲和預防的雙重價值取向，體現(xiàn)了尊重和保障人權、對司法公正和效率的價值追求。此外，該程序就其程序的核心內(nèi)容而言，程序適用的范圍、特別的訴訟性質(zhì)、特別的訴訟程序等方面都體現(xiàn)了《公約》的基本精神和相關規(guī)定。當然，中國違法所得沒收程序在一些制度方面還和《公約》存在差距。因此，有必要參照《公約》的規(guī)定，，明確沒收對象的范圍、明確程序的證明標準和舉證責任，明確司法協(xié)助的問題等制度方面的規(guī)定，以便更好的履行《公約》的義務，早日實現(xiàn)與《公約》的全面對接。
[Abstract]:As the world's first legal document to guide the international fight against corruption, the adoption of the United Nations Convention against Corruption is of great significance to all countries in strengthening domestic anti-corruption actions, improving the effectiveness of anti-corruption, and promoting international cooperation against corruption.In particular, Chapter V of the Convention, "Asset recovery mechanisms", explicitly provides for the confiscation of proceeds of corruption offences.The procedure not only solves the problem of confiscating the proceeds of corruption without criminal conviction, but also in the case of a criminal suspect, an accused person who dies, absconds or is unable to prosecute him in absentia.The maximum recovery of the proceeds of corruption crime, and the establishment of the system also conforms to the current international anti-corruption, anti-terrorism situation, for countries to recover the proceeds of corruption crime provides a basis.As a State party to the Convention, China, in accordance with the provisions of the Convention, has added the "Special confiscation procedure for illegal proceeds" in the newly amended Criminal procedure Law in 2012.The establishment of this procedure conforms to the current international and domestic situation of anti-corruption and anti-terrorism. It is the requirement of perfecting China's criminal procedure legal system and fulfilling the basic obligations of the Convention.At the same time, the establishment of the procedure takes into account the dual value orientation of severe punishment and prevention, and embodies the value pursuit of respecting and protecting human rights and of judicial justice and efficiency.In addition, as far as the core content of the procedure is concerned, the scope of application of the procedure, the nature of the proceedings in particular, and the special procedure all embody the basic spirit and relevant provisions of the Convention.Of course, the procedure of confiscation of illegal income in China is still different from the Convention in some systems.Therefore, it is necessary to clarify the scope of the object of confiscation, the standard of proof and the burden of proof of the procedure, and the provisions of the system, such as the question of mutual legal assistance, in order to better fulfil the obligations of the Convention, taking into account the provisions of the Convention,To realize the comprehensive docking with the Convention at an early date.
【學位授予單位】：外交學院
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D997.9;D925.2

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前1條

1 袁益波;刑法中沒收物之分類研究[J];華東政法學院學報;2004年01期

本文編號：1763124