本文選題：合并仲裁 + 合并開庭　； 參考：《大連海事大學(xué)》2015年博士論文

【摘要】：本文第一章主要介紹了合并仲裁與合并開庭的概念,并對相似概念進(jìn)行了評析,分析了二者之間的關(guān)系,梳理了合并仲裁與合并開庭的發(fā)展歷程。第二章分析了合并仲裁與合并開庭的優(yōu)勢與困境。優(yōu)勢主要包括避免出現(xiàn)不一致的仲裁裁決,保障公平,節(jié)約仲裁資源,提高仲裁效率等。困境主要是違反了當(dāng)事人的意思自治,破壞了仲裁的秘密性原則,受《紐約公約》的阻礙等。第三章探討了合并仲裁與合并開庭的仲裁規(guī)則及其立法現(xiàn)狀,從世界上主要國家的法律規(guī)定和國際主要仲裁機(jī)構(gòu)的仲裁規(guī)則出發(fā),研究合并仲裁與合并開庭制度,且在此基礎(chǔ)上比較分析我國法律和仲裁規(guī)則對合并仲裁與合并開庭的規(guī)定,發(fā)現(xiàn)我國現(xiàn)行法律對合并仲裁與合并開庭制度的規(guī)定處于立法空白階段,且我國主要仲裁規(guī)則對合并仲裁與合并開庭的規(guī)定也不成體系,亟待完善。第四章研究了合并仲裁與合并開庭的仲裁規(guī)則設(shè)計(jì),分別從合并仲裁與合并開庭的適用條件,決定權(quán)歸屬,仲裁員指定,仲裁裁決的作出以及與其他制度的互動(dòng)等角度構(gòu)建其機(jī)制。第五章研究了合并仲裁與合并開庭制度與我國仲裁立法修改的協(xié)調(diào),先分析了合并仲裁與合并開庭在我國現(xiàn)有仲裁立法下的發(fā)展難點(diǎn),這包括合并仲裁與合并開庭制度在我國仲裁立法下缺失法理基礎(chǔ),合并仲裁與合并開庭的范圍無法確定,仲裁員指定較難以及仲裁裁決不易被承認(rèn)與執(zhí)行等。然后通過總結(jié)、借鑒英美法律協(xié)調(diào)合并仲裁、合并開庭的經(jīng)驗(yàn),探討了我國仲裁立法協(xié)調(diào)解決上述難點(diǎn)的對應(yīng)措施。
[Abstract]:The first chapter mainly introduces the concept of merger arbitration and joint court session, analyzes the similar concepts, analyzes the relationship between them, and combs the development course of merger arbitration and combined court session.The second chapter analyzes the advantages and difficulties of combined arbitration and joint court.The advantages include avoiding inconsistent arbitration awards, safeguarding fairness, saving arbitration resources and improving arbitration efficiency.The dilemma mainly violates the autonomy of the parties, undermines the secret principle of arbitration, and is obstructed by the New York Convention.The third chapter discusses the arbitration rules and the current legislative situation of the combined arbitration and the joint session. From the legal provisions of the major countries in the world and the arbitration rules of the major international arbitration institutions, the paper studies the system of the combined arbitration and the combined court session.On the basis of the comparison and analysis of the provisions of our country's laws and arbitration rules on the merger arbitration and the combined court session, it is found that the provisions of the current law of our country on the system of the combined arbitration and the combined court session are in the legislative blank stage.Moreover, the main rules of arbitration in our country are not systematic in terms of merger arbitration and combined court session, which need to be improved urgently.Chapter four studies the design of arbitration rules for combined arbitration and joint session, respectively, from the applicable conditions of combined arbitration and joint session, the ownership of the decision, the appointment of arbitrators,The mechanism of arbitration award is constructed from the angle of making arbitration award and interacting with other systems.Chapter five studies the coordination between the system of merger arbitration and the system of combined court session and the revision of arbitration legislation in our country, and analyzes the difficulties in the development of merger arbitration and combined court session under the existing arbitration legislation of our country.This includes that the system of combined arbitration and combined session lacks the legal basis under our country's arbitration legislation, the scope of combined arbitration and joint session cannot be determined, the appointment of arbitrators is difficult, and the arbitral award is not easy to be recognized and enforced.Then, by summing up, drawing lessons from the experience of coordinated and combined arbitration in Anglo-American law, this paper probes into the corresponding measures to solve the above difficulties in our country's arbitration legislation harmoniously.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：大連海事大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號(hào)】：D925.7

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 艾薩克·I·多爾;白仁杰;;國際貿(mào)易糾紛的和平解決(下)——對于聯(lián)合國國際貿(mào)易法委員會(huì)調(diào)解規(guī)則適用范圍的分析[J];國際貿(mào)易;1985年04期

2 吳卡;顏杰雄;;吉隆坡區(qū)域仲裁中心仲裁規(guī)則(2010年修訂)[J];仲裁研究;2011年02期

3 [k然;Kong Lingzhong;;為當(dāng)事人提供更優(yōu)質(zhì)的仲裁服務(wù)——中國國際經(jīng)濟(jì)貿(mào)易仲裁委員會(huì)副主任李勇就仲裁規(guī)則的修定與施行答本刊記者問[J];中國法律;2000年05期

4 趙秀文;;論仲裁規(guī)則的性質(zhì)及其與仲裁法之間的關(guān)系[J];河北法學(xué);2008年06期

5 楊安山;余正;;簡評《2010年新加坡國際仲裁中心仲裁規(guī)則》[J];中國海商法年刊;2011年02期

6 薛俊林;;從完善基金仲裁規(guī)則的角度談基民權(quán)益的保障[J];河南工程學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2011年02期

7 張彥軍;;仲裁規(guī)則的法律地位與制定權(quán)探討[J];商業(yè)時(shí)代;2011年27期

8 曾建國;國際經(jīng)貿(mào)活動(dòng)仲裁規(guī)則中若干操作問題研究[J];政治與法律;1993年03期

9 張玲;新國際經(jīng)濟(jì)貿(mào)易仲裁規(guī)則的特點(diǎn)[J];環(huán)渤海經(jīng)濟(jì)w，

本文編號(hào)：1759312