本文選題：專家輔助人 + 訴訟地位　； 參考：《法律適用》2017年01期

【摘要】：由于單一的司法鑒定模式存在一些固有的缺陷,近年來我國在以司法鑒定制度為主的基礎(chǔ)上,逐步建立了專家輔助人制度。由于法律和司法解釋關(guān)于專家輔助人的規(guī)定還比較粗疏,專家輔助人制度在實踐運行中存在一系列的問題。本文擬從專家輔助人的基本理論出發(fā),結(jié)合我國專家輔助人制度的現(xiàn)狀及在實踐中的不足,對專家輔助人的地位及專家輔助人意見效力進行論證,并從專家輔助人的資格審查、中立性要求、啟動程序、出庭與質(zhì)證規(guī)則等方面提出了完善專家輔助人制度的初步建議。
[Abstract]:The judicial identification of the single model has some inherent defects, in recent years in our country on the basis of the judicial identification system based on the gradual establishment of the auxiliary expert system. Because the provisions about the expert assistant is careless to explain the law and justice, the expert assistant system in the practice of a series of problems. This paper starts from the basic theory of expert assistant, with the current situation of China's expert auxiliary system and problems in practice, and the status of auxiliary expert opinion of the expert assistant effect are discussed, and the auxiliary qualification to help people from experts, neutrality, procedure, and evidence rules of court and put forward preliminary proposals for perfecting the expert assistant system.

【作者單位】： 江蘇省高級人民法院;江蘇省高級人民法院研究室;
【分類號】：D925.1

【相似文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 劉寧;商輔助人探析[J];呂梁高等�？茖W(xué)校學(xué)報;2004年03期

2 莫于川;;從專家輔助人制度看司法潮流[J];人民檢察;2006年21期

3 張善q，

本文編號：1759138