本文選題：行為保全 + 財產(chǎn)保全　； 參考：《華東政法大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：行為保全制度作為2012年《中華人民共和國民事訴訟法》修改增加的內(nèi)容，滿足了司法實踐過程中的現(xiàn)實需求。同時，行為保全內(nèi)容的增加也完善了我國的保全制度體系。但民訴法并未就行為保全制度的適用做出具體且有針對性的規(guī)定。法條仍然將財產(chǎn)保全制度和行為保全制度規(guī)定在同一個法條當(dāng)中，由此許多適用規(guī)定仍然是參照財產(chǎn)保全制度中的內(nèi)容�？紤]到原有財產(chǎn)保全制度在擔(dān)保、審理、救濟(jì)等方面仍存在諸多亟待明確完善之處的現(xiàn)實背景，同時又缺少針對行為保全執(zhí)行措施等的相關(guān)規(guī)定。鑒于上述情形，制度的推廣實施勢必將面臨著較大的阻礙。因此，筆者希望通過分析現(xiàn)有行為保全制度，得出針對行為保全制度運行的有關(guān)建議。 就文章整體而言，結(jié)構(gòu)上包括了導(dǎo)言、正文和結(jié)語三個部分。開篇導(dǎo)言闡述了選題的背景和意義，同時通過文獻(xiàn)綜述總結(jié)當(dāng)前行為保全制度運行的得失，進(jìn)而確定了正文的結(jié)構(gòu)。 文章的正文部分，分為三個章節(jié)，分別為我國行為保全制度體系化研究的提出背景；體系化研究中對國內(nèi)外行為保全制度的比較借鑒；行為保全制度體系構(gòu)建的具體設(shè)想。其中第一章中涉及的制度現(xiàn)存不足總結(jié)自最高人民法院出版的針對2012年民事訴訟法修改的條文解讀、法院的研討論壇以及學(xué)術(shù)文獻(xiàn)�，F(xiàn)存不足分為兩大部分，首先總述行為保全制度在法律規(guī)定上的缺失，其次圍繞著行為保全制度適用的流程將問題分為三部分:行為保全制度適用的整體規(guī)定、適用時的具體規(guī)定及適用后的有關(guān)規(guī)定。第二章圍繞英美法系的中間禁令制度、大陸法系的假處分制度、臨時裁定制度、知識產(chǎn)權(quán)領(lǐng)域的訴前禁令制度及海事領(lǐng)域的海事強制令進(jìn)行國內(nèi)外行為保全制度的橫縱向比較研究，總結(jié)經(jīng)驗，為第三章的制度構(gòu)想奠定基礎(chǔ)。在第三章的制度構(gòu)想中，筆者重申了行為保全制度在適用過程中應(yīng)兼顧準(zhǔn)確性和時效性兩個特點，保證行為保全裁定正確高效的實施。并設(shè)想了行為保全制度的具體原則，最后圍繞行為保全制度的目的，遵循行為保全制度的原則，對應(yīng)第一章提出行為保全制度運行過程中存在著的問題展開進(jìn)一步的分析，并提出相應(yīng)的對策。 結(jié)語部分，對全文的研究進(jìn)行概括性的描述，表達(dá)了筆者希望通過本文一方面對目前行為保全制度運行過程中存在的問題做總體的歸納剖析；另一方面，通過比較國內(nèi)外的行為保全制度，參考借鑒其中的制度經(jīng)驗，提出解決現(xiàn)存問題的答案，，為行為保全制度在司法實踐過程中的順利運行提出相關(guān)的建議。同時，也提出了應(yīng)當(dāng)結(jié)合實踐來對行為保全制度的程序化規(guī)定進(jìn)行不斷的修正，完善，從而實現(xiàn)行為保全制度的立法初衷。
[Abstract]:The act preservation system, as an increase in the revision of the Civil procedure Law of the people's Republic of China in 2012, meets the practical needs in the course of judicial practice.At the same time, the increase of the content of behavior preservation also improved the preservation system of our country.However, the civil action law has not made specific and targeted provisions on the application of the act preservation system.The articles of law still stipulate the property preservation system and the behavior preservation system in the same article, so many applicable provisions still refer to the contents of the property preservation system.In view of the original property preservation system in the guarantee, trial, relief and other aspects of the existence of a number of urgent need to clear and perfect the reality of the background, but also the lack of enforcement measures for acts of preservation and other relevant provisions.In view of the above situation, the promotion and implementation of the system will inevitably face greater obstacles.Therefore, the author hopes that through the analysis of the existing act preservation system, we can draw some suggestions for the action preservation system.As far as the whole article is concerned, the structure includes three parts: introduction, text and conclusion.The introduction explains the background and significance of the topic, summarizes the gains and losses of the current action preservation system through literature review, and then determines the structure of the text.The text of the article is divided into three chapters, respectively for the background of the research on the systematization of behavior preservation system in China; the comparative reference to the domestic and foreign behavior preservation system in the study of systematization; the specific ideas of the construction of the system of behavior preservation system.In the first chapter, the existing deficiencies of the system are summarized from the interpretation of the articles published by the Supreme people's Court on the revision of the Civil procedure Law in 2012, the forum of the courts and the academic literature.The existing deficiencies are divided into two parts: first, the deficiency of the act preservation system in the legal provisions; secondly, the problem is divided into three parts around the process of the application of the act preservation system: the overall provisions of the act preservation system.Specific provisions when applicable and relevant provisions after application.The second chapter revolves around the system of interdictive prohibition in common law system, the system of false disposition in civil law system, and the system of temporary adjudication.The pre-litigation injunction system in the field of intellectual property rights and maritime injunction in maritime field are compared with each other in domestic and foreign systems of preservation of conduct, and the experience is summarized, which lays a foundation for the institutional conception in Chapter three.In the third chapter, the author reiterates that the behavior preservation system should take into account the characteristics of accuracy and timeliness in the process of application to ensure the correct and efficient implementation of the act preservation ruling.Finally, around the purpose of the act preservation system, following the principle of the act preservation system, the author puts forward the problems existing in the course of the behavior preservation system in the first chapter.And put forward the corresponding countermeasures.In the conclusion part, the author gives a general description of the whole research, and expresses the author's hope that, on the one hand, the problems existing in the operation of the act preservation system can be summarized and analyzed; on the other hand,By comparing the domestic and foreign behavior preservation system, referring to the system experience, the author puts forward the solution to the existing problems, and puts forward some relevant suggestions for the smooth operation of the act preservation system in the judicial practice.At the same time, the author also puts forward that the procedural regulations of the act preservation system should be revised and perfected in combination with practice, so as to realize the original legislative intention of the act preservation system.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D925.18

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前6條

1 郭小冬;;論保全裁定的執(zhí)行[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2010年04期

2 董曉敏;;論知識產(chǎn)權(quán)訴訟中的臨時禁令[J];法律適用;2008年07期

3 范躍如;;試論我國行為保全制度及其構(gòu)建與完善[J];法學(xué)家;2004年05期

4 黃文藝;;比較法視域下我國民事保全制度的修改與完善[J];比較法研究;2012年05期

5 呂輝;;論日本行為保全制度及其啟示[J];湖北社會科學(xué);2013年02期

6 李仕春;;民事保全程序基本問題研究[J];中外法學(xué);2005年01期

本文編號：1757145