本文選題：無條件選擇性沖突規(guī)范 + 連結點�。� 參考：《法律科學(西北政法大學學報)》2017年04期

【摘要】：我國《法律適用法》中共有9條無條件選擇性沖突規(guī)范,根據(jù)法官選擇方式的不同,可以分為法官被動選擇的沖突規(guī)范和法官主動選擇的沖突規(guī)范。前者的功能在于維護和促進某種法律關系的成立;后者的功能在于確保法律選擇的靈活性以實現(xiàn)個案公正。我國法院對此類沖突規(guī)范的適用存在著說理不清、選擇連結點的依據(jù)不明等問題。在司法實踐中,對于法官被動選擇的沖突規(guī)范,法官可以逐一、直接適用連結點指向的實體法對爭議問題的有效性進行判斷,只要有一個連結點指向的實體法認可其有效性,就應認定為有效;對于法官主動選擇的沖突規(guī)范,法官應當考量個案中的實體正義和公共政策來選擇應當適用的連結點,并在判決書中對選擇連結點的理由做出說明,不能完全無條件地自由裁量;對于主客觀連結點并列的沖突規(guī)范,法官應當根據(jù)該規(guī)則的立法目的,按照司法任務簡單化的要求,優(yōu)先根據(jù)客觀連結點選擇準據(jù)法。
[Abstract]:There are nine rules of unconditional selective conflict in our Law of Application of Law, which can be divided into the conflict norms of passive choice of judges and the conflict norms of active choice of judges according to the different ways of selecting judges.The function of the former is to maintain and promote the establishment of a certain legal relationship, while the latter is to ensure the flexibility of the choice of law in order to realize the justice of the case.There are some problems in the application of this kind of conflict norms in Chinese courts, such as unclear reasoning and unclear basis for selecting the connecting points.In judicial practice, the judge can judge the validity of the dispute directly by applying the substantive law pointing to the connecting point one by one, as long as there is a substantive law pointing at the connecting point to confirm the validity of the conflict norm of the passive choice of the judge.Should be considered valid; in the case of conflict norms of active choice of judges, the judge should consider substantive justice and public policy in the individual case to select the points of connection to which they should apply and, in the judgement, to explain the reasons for the choice of the link points,The judge should choose the applicable law according to the legislative purpose of the rule, according to the simple request of judicial task, according to the objective link point.
【作者單位】： 武漢大學國際法研究所;
【分類號】：D926.2
，

本文編號：1757472