本文選題：少年　切入點(diǎn)：少年司法　出處：《南京師范大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：自1899年美國(guó)伊利諾斯州建立第一個(gè)少年法院以來(lái),少年司法制度已歷經(jīng)一百多年的發(fā)展。少年司法制度已經(jīng)成為一個(gè)國(guó)家法治化進(jìn)程的重要標(biāo)志。保護(hù)處分制度是少年司法制度的重要組成部分,并成為目前世界各國(guó)對(duì)違法犯罪少年的處遇模式。但是我國(guó)少年司法制度中,并沒(méi)規(guī)定少年保護(hù)處分制度。我國(guó)目前的少年司法制度仍是少年刑事司法制度,對(duì)犯罪少年的主要處理措施,仍是以刑罰為支配地位的。于此同時(shí),一些實(shí)施嚴(yán)重不良行為的少年被我國(guó)少年司法制度邊緣化處理。簡(jiǎn)而言之,我國(guó)少年司法制度刑事色彩過(guò)濃,缺乏福利性色彩。我國(guó)少年司法制度要擺脫目前發(fā)展中面臨的困境,保護(hù)處分制度提供了一個(gè)良性的選擇。本文擬通過(guò)對(duì)少年保護(hù)處分制度的源起、內(nèi)涵等方面的研究,在分析我國(guó)目前少年司法制度所面臨的困境的基礎(chǔ)上,構(gòu)建符合我國(guó)國(guó)情的少年保護(hù)處分制度。 本文主要分為四章,第一章主要論述了少年保護(hù)處分制度基礎(chǔ)理論,包括少年保護(hù)處分制度的源起、理論基礎(chǔ)、概念、種類,并從對(duì)象、審判組織、處遇、程序等四個(gè)方面對(duì)少年保護(hù)處分制度的內(nèi)涵進(jìn)行闡釋。少年保護(hù)處分制度是一個(gè)完整的制度,其福利性措施能夠有效地實(shí)現(xiàn)對(duì)“特殊”少年的教育與矯治。 第二章對(duì)我國(guó)少年司法理念以及我國(guó)目前少年司法制度發(fā)展的現(xiàn)狀,進(jìn)行分析,說(shuō)明我國(guó)構(gòu)建少年保護(hù)處分制度的必要性。 第三章主要論證了我國(guó)構(gòu)建少年保護(hù)處分制度的可行性。從我國(guó)是否具備構(gòu)建少年保護(hù)處分制度的理論基礎(chǔ)、條件,以及少年司法實(shí)踐是否提供有利借鑒等方面進(jìn)行分析。 第四章在對(duì)國(guó)外相關(guān)制度進(jìn)行分析的基礎(chǔ)上,對(duì)比研究,構(gòu)建符合我國(guó)國(guó)情的少年保護(hù)處分制度。首先構(gòu)建我國(guó)少年保護(hù)處分體系。其次是對(duì)保護(hù)處分制度具體的設(shè)計(jì),包括保護(hù)程序的啟動(dòng),審理原則、審理程序等。
[Abstract]:Since the establishment of the first juvenile court in Illinois in 1899, juvenile justice system has been developed for more than one hundred years.Juvenile justice system has become an important symbol of the process of rule of law in a country.The system of protection and punishment is an important part of juvenile justice system, and it has become the mode of dealing with juvenile delinquents all over the world.However, in our juvenile justice system, there is no provision for juvenile protection and punishment system.China's current juvenile justice system is still the juvenile criminal justice system, and the main measures to deal with juvenile delinquency are still dominated by punishment.At the same time, some juvenile who carry out serious bad behavior are marginalized by our juvenile justice system.In short, our juvenile justice system is too strong in criminal color, lack of welfare color.In order to get rid of the predicament in the development of juvenile justice system in our country, the system of protection and punishment provides a benign choice.Based on the study of the origin and connotation of juvenile protection and punishment system, and on the basis of analyzing the difficulties faced by our country's juvenile justice system at present, this paper intends to construct a juvenile protection and punishment system in accordance with the national conditions of our country.This paper is divided into four chapters. The first chapter mainly discusses the basic theory of juvenile protection and punishment system, including the origin, theoretical basis, concept, types, and from the object, trial organization, treatment.Procedure and other four aspects to explain the connotation of juvenile protection and punishment system.Juvenile protection and punishment system is a complete system, and its welfare measures can effectively realize the education and correction of "special" juveniles.The second chapter analyzes the concept of juvenile justice and the current situation of the development of juvenile justice system in China, and explains the necessity of constructing juvenile protection and punishment system in China.The third chapter mainly demonstrates the feasibility of constructing juvenile protection punishment system in China.This paper analyzes whether China has the theoretical basis and conditions for constructing juvenile protection and punishment system, and whether the practice of juvenile justice provides beneficial reference.Chapter four, based on the analysis of foreign related systems, constructs the juvenile protection and punishment system in accordance with the situation of our country.First of all, the construction of juvenile protection punishment system.The second is the specific design of protective punishment system, including the initiation of protective procedures, trial principles, trial procedures, and so on.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：南京師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D922.1;D925.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 陳建明;未成年被告人暫緩判決的實(shí)踐與思考[J];青少年犯罪問(wèn)題;2002年02期

2 樊榮慶;;德國(guó)少年司法制度研究[J];青少年犯罪問(wèn)題;2007年03期

3 蘇明月;;從中日少年案件處理流程與矯正之比較看少年司法模式[J];青少年犯罪問(wèn)題;2010年01期

4 武良軍;童偉華;;臺(tái)灣地區(qū)少年犯處遇的考察及啟示[J];青少年犯罪問(wèn)題;2013年01期

5 狄小華;;“優(yōu)先保護(hù)”理念下的我國(guó)少年刑事司法模式選擇[J];南京大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué).人文科學(xué).社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2009年05期

6 狄小華;谷平;;論中國(guó)特色少年司法之功能定位[J];南京人口管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2012年04期

7 福建省石獅市人民檢察院課題組;;未成年人犯罪問(wèn)題實(shí)證研究——以福建省近五年未成年人犯罪數(shù)據(jù)為藍(lán)本[J];中國(guó)檢察官;2013年11期

8 張旭;;未成年人犯罪的處遇措施:比較與借鑒[J];人民檢察;2006年05期

9 張鴻巍;;刑事訴訟法修訂后的未成年人刑事政策[J];預(yù)防青少年犯罪研究;2012年05期

10 于國(guó)旦;;保護(hù)處分及其在我國(guó)的適用[J];國(guó)家檢察官學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2009年03期

，

本文編號(hào)：1727561