刑事證人出庭制度的再完善
發(fā)布時間:2018-04-08 09:54
本文選題:刑事訴訟 切入點:證人 出處:《湖南師范大學》2014年碩士論文
【摘要】:建立證人出庭作證制度的根本目的是為了在實現(xiàn)實體公正的同時實現(xiàn)程序公正,讓正義能夠以看得見的方式實現(xiàn),因此該制度的設(shè)計與完善對于刑事司法審判公正的實現(xiàn)具有十分重要的意義。我國2012年修改《刑事訴訟法》時,對證據(jù)制度作了較大的補充和完善。其中,在證人出庭作證制度方面有了較大的突破,主要體現(xiàn)在證人出庭范圍、強制證人出庭和證人保護三個方面。并且,公安部、最高人民檢察院、最高人民法院分別出臺了《公安機關(guān)辦理刑事案件程序規(guī)定》、《人民檢察院刑事訴訟規(guī)則(試行)》、《最高人民法院關(guān)于適用中華人民共和國刑事訴訟法的解釋》,也對證人出庭作證的相關(guān)問題予以明確,以期該制度能在司法實際工作中得以順利實施。但是,新刑事訴訟法實施一年來,證人出庭率依然很低,較之以往基本上沒有明顯改觀,其中一個重要的原因就是證人出庭制度仍不完善,仍然存在諸多立法缺陷?梢哉f,與嚴謹、發(fā)達的域外立法相比,我國新刑事訴訟法所構(gòu)建的證人出庭制度仍處于初級階段,顯得較為簡陋。其制度設(shè)計上的局限性可能導致諸多消極后果,例如:司法機關(guān)可能規(guī)避和擱置證人出庭程序、證人仍舊不愿或不敢出庭作證、被告人的質(zhì)證權(quán)得不到有效保障等。因此,我國有必要在現(xiàn)有證人出庭作證規(guī)則體系的基礎(chǔ)上,以保障當事人的證明權(quán)為基點,以保障司法公正和司法公信力為目標,對新刑事訴訟法有關(guān)證人出庭作證制度進行審視,通過借鑒域外有關(guān)立法經(jīng)驗并結(jié)合中國實際,對該制度存在的問題著手加以解決,除完善證人出庭范圍、強制證人出庭和證人保護三個方面的制度規(guī)范外,還應(yīng)進一步完善相關(guān)配套措施。
[Abstract]:The fundamental purpose of establishing the system of witness testifying in court is to realize the procedural justice while realizing substantive justice, so that justice can be realized in a visible way.Therefore, the design and perfection of the system is of great significance to the realization of the justice of criminal justice.When the Criminal procedure Law was amended in 2012, the evidence system was greatly supplemented and perfected.Among them, there has been a great breakthrough in the system of witness appearing in court, mainly embodied in the scope of witness appearing in court, compulsory witness appearing in court and witness protection.And, the Ministry of Public Security, the Supreme people's Procuratorate,The Supreme people's Court separately promulgated the provisions on procedures for handling Criminal cases by Public Security organs, the rules of Criminal procedure of the people's Procuratorate (on trial), and the interpretation of the Supreme people's Court on the Application of the Criminal procedure Law of the people's Republic of China.The issues related to witnesses appearing in court to testify are clarified,This system can be carried out smoothly in the judicial practice.However, since the implementation of the new criminal procedure law one year ago, the rate of witnesses appearing in court is still very low, and there is no obvious improvement compared with the previous one. One of the important reasons is that the system of witnesses appearing in court is still not perfect, and there are still many legislative defects.It can be said that, compared with strict and developed extraterritorial legislation, the witness appearance system constructed by the new criminal procedure law is still in the primary stage, which is relatively simple.The limitations of its system design may lead to many negative consequences, such as: the judicial organ may evade and shelve the witness's appearance procedure, the witness is still unwilling or afraid to testify in court, the defendant's right of cross-examination cannot be effectively guaranteed, and so on.Therefore, it is necessary for our country to take the protection of the right of proof of the parties as the basic point on the basis of the existing rules system of witnesses appearing in court and to ensure the judicial justice and judicial credibility.This paper examines the system of witnesses appearing in court in the new criminal procedure law, and by drawing lessons from overseas relevant legislative experience and combining with the reality of China, proceeds to solve the problems existing in the system, in addition to perfecting the scope of witnesses appearing in court.Besides compulsory witness appearance and witness protection, relevant supporting measures should be further improved.
【學位授予單位】:湖南師范大學
【學位級別】:碩士
【學位授予年份】:2014
【分類號】:D925.2
【參考文獻】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前6條
1 袁艷平;李佳;賈檸寧;;兩大法系刑事訴訟證人出庭作證制度之考察[J];河北農(nóng)業(yè)大學學報(農(nóng)林教育版);2012年03期
2 王永興;;刑事證人出庭作證制度的理解與適用[J];江南論壇;2013年06期
3 朱建中;王宇;;論刑事訴訟平衡模式——以刑事證人出庭作證制度為視角[J];中國檢察官;2013年09期
4 史立梅;;我國刑事證人出庭作證制度的改革及其評價[J];山東社會科學;2013年04期
5 張澤濤;;證人出庭的現(xiàn)狀分析與對策探討[J];證據(jù)學論壇;2001年01期
6 萬毅;;《刑事訴訟法修正案(草案)》證據(jù)制度修正條文釋評[J];證據(jù)學論壇;2012年00期
,本文編號:1721100
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/susongfa/1721100.html