本文選題：審判信息公開　切入點：司法公正　出處：《海南大學》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：全面推進司法信息公開是我國建設社會主義法治國家的必然要求,是實現司法獨立與公正、提升司法公信力、促進審判監(jiān)督以及保障公民知情權的重要舉措。審判信息公開是司法信息公開的重要內容,貫穿于訴訟活動的全過程,實現審判信息公開當然的也具有更好的保證司法獨立與公正,更好的保障公民權利等作用。自從司法改革被提出以來,審判信息公開也在我國各級人民法院中逐步推進,并且取得了一定的成績,如審判信息公開的范圍有所擴大、審判信息公開的途徑越加多樣化等,司法透明度得到了明顯的提高。但由于一些原因,以至于一些規(guī)定未能真正得到落實,審判信息公開實施的不夠徹底。審判信息公開作為司法信息公開的重要內容,具有重要的地位,研究審判信息公開在實踐中存在的具體問題,進而提出相關的完善建議,有利于盡快的建設出一套符合國家利益和人民利益,符合司法發(fā)展方向的審判信息公開制度,對全面建設社會主義法治社會有著必然的社會意義。本文將通過以下三個模塊來對我國審判信息公開問題進行闡述:第一部分主要介紹審判信息公開的概念以及價值。這部分一是解決何為審判信息的問題,對審判信息的范圍進行界定,為下文奠定理論基礎;二是闡述審判信息公開的價值,審判信息公開不僅有助于推動司法獨立與公正以及提高司法公信力,其還是保障公民知情權的一個重要方式,另外,審判信息公開就是把法院的審判活動完全公之于眾,使社會公眾能夠切實了解司法工作人員的工作,實現公民對司法工作人員司法活動的監(jiān)督。正因為審判信息公開具有其獨特的價值,他才值得我們費力研究并發(fā)現問題、提出解決方案。第二部分主要是對我國法院審判信息公開的現狀及其存在的問題進行分析。這部分內容首先要求對我國審判信息公開的現狀有相對準確的分析,只有對現狀分析準確了,找出的問題才會是目前切實存在的問題,提出的建議也才具有實際價值。目前我國各個地區(qū)、各個級別的法院審判信息的公開程度和方式都有所不同,筆者通過翻閱相關文獻,瀏覽各級人民法院官方網站以及各信息公開專門網站,調查了解我國法院審判信息的公開現狀,進而總結出目前我國審判信息公開存在的問題,主要包括缺少法律支撐、缺乏監(jiān)督和救濟機制、信息公開不全面不及時等普適性問題。第三部分主要是針對我國法院審判信息公開存在的問題提出相關的完善建議。針對我國當前審判信息公開中存在的問題,筆者提出從完善立法、建立監(jiān)督和救濟機制、培養(yǎng)審判機關對公開的正確認識、明確審判信息公開范圍以及構建審判信息公開的途徑五個方面對我國審判信息公開進行完善。
[Abstract]:It is necessary for our country to build a socialist country ruled by law to promote the publicity of judicial information in an all-round way. It is also an important measure to realize judicial independence and impartiality, to enhance judicial credibility, to promote judicial supervision and to protect citizens' right to know.Open trial information is an important content of judicial information disclosure, which runs through the whole process of litigation. Of course, the realization of open trial information also has a better guarantee of judicial independence and impartiality, better protection of civil rights and so on.Since the judicial reform was put forward, the publicity of trial information has been gradually promoted in the people's courts at all levels in our country, and has made certain achievements. For example, the scope of open trial information has been expanded, the channels of opening trial information have become more and more diversified, and so on.Judicial transparency has been significantly improved.However, for some reasons, some regulations have not been really implemented, and the public implementation of trial information is not thorough enough.As an important content of judicial information publicity, the open trial information has an important position. This paper studies the concrete problems existing in the practice of the trial information publicity, and then puts forward the relevant perfect suggestions.It is beneficial to the construction of an open system of trial information, which conforms to the interests of the country and the people and the direction of judicial development, which is of inevitable social significance to the construction of a socialist society ruled by law in an all-round way.In this paper, the following three modules will be used to explain the issue of open trial information in China: the first part mainly introduces the concept and value of trial information disclosure.The first part is to solve the problem of what is the trial information, to define the scope of the trial information, to lay the theoretical foundation for the following; the second is to elaborate the value of the trial information publicity.Open trial information is not only helpful to promote judicial independence and impartiality and enhance judicial credibility, but also an important way to protect citizens' right to know. In addition, open trial information is to make the trial activities of the court completely public.So that the public can understand the work of judicial staff and realize the supervision of judicial activities.It is because of the unique value of open trial information that it is worth our effort to study and discover problems and put forward solutions.The second part mainly analyzes the current situation and existing problems of court trial information disclosure in our country.First of all, this part requires a relatively accurate analysis of the current situation of the disclosure of trial information in China. Only when the analysis of the present situation is accurate, can the problem be identified as a practical problem and the suggestions put forward have practical value.At present, there are differences in the degree and manner of disclosure of court information in various regions and levels of our country. By reading the relevant documents, I browse the official websites of people's courts at all levels and the special websites for information disclosure.This paper investigates the current situation of the disclosure of judicial information in Chinese courts, and sums up the problems existing in the publicity of judicial information in our country, including the lack of legal support, the lack of supervision and relief mechanism, the lack of comprehensive and timely disclosure of information, and so on.The third part is to put forward some suggestions on the problems of open trial information in our country.In view of the problems existing in the publicity of trial information in our country, the author puts forward the following suggestions: perfecting legislation, establishing supervision and relief mechanism, and training the judicial organs' correct understanding of the publicity.This paper clarifies the scope of open trial information and the ways to construct open trial information.
【學位授予單位】：海南大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D926.2

【相似文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 李峰;入世后我國法院執(zhí)行工作面臨的新問題及對策[J];山東審判;2001年02期

2 張衛(wèi)平;論我國法院體制的非行政化——法院體制改革的一種基本思路[J];法商研究(中南政法學院學報);2000年03期

3 賀小勇;論世貿組織協定在我國法院的適用問題[J];國際貿易問題;2001年03期

4 朱庚;;我國法院信息化建設探討[J];科技成果縱橫;2006年04期

5 王莉;;論我國法院體制改革的目標選擇[J];中共鄭州市委黨校學報;2006年05期

6 李旺;謝晴川;;我國法院對日勞工索賠訴訟的管轄權問題研究[J];清華法學;2009年06期

7 宋建立;;不便管轄原則在我國法院的適用[J];人民司法;2012年21期

8 辛琪;如何使我國法院的判決在外國執(zhí)行[J];中國商貿;1996年20期

9 譚世貴;;我國法院司法信息公開的實踐、問題與對策[J];法治研究;2014年04期

10 黃鳴鶴;;當前我國法院人事制度和機構改革走勢微探[J];福建法學;2000年01期

相關會議論文 前4條

1 田孟華;;創(chuàng)建學習型法院與提高法院審判質效——基于我國法院黨建工作的思考[A];當代法學論壇（二０一一年第三輯）[C];2011年

2 田孟華;;創(chuàng)建學習型法院與提高法院審判質效——基于我國法院黨建工作的思考[A];當代法學論壇（2011年第2輯）[C];2011年

3 黃韜;;考察我國法院處理不良金融債權爭議案件的政治維度[A];2009年度（第七屆）中國法經濟學論壇論文集[C];2009年

4 宮澎;;對法院改革背景下法官教育培訓的幾點思考[A];法學教育：比較與省思——現代法學教育論壇文集[C];2001年

相關重要報紙文章 前10條

1 何秋婷;論世貿協議在我國法院的適用[N];人民法院報;2000年

2 本報記者 胡Z凇⊥ㄑ對，

本文編號：1721061