本文選題：取證模型　切入點(diǎn)：電子證據(jù)　出處：《重慶郵電大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：電子證據(jù)取證模型是一個交叉學(xué)科的研究領(lǐng)域，它是電子取證的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)化過程。在國外，電子證據(jù)取證模型的研究已經(jīng)較為成熟，且一些國家在制定和完善本國電子證據(jù)立法時也吸收了電子證據(jù)取證模型中的合理成分，對電子證據(jù)取證程序起到了很好的規(guī)制效果。而截止目前，國內(nèi)還鮮有學(xué)者對電子證據(jù)取證模型進(jìn)行研究，特別是對電子證據(jù)取證模型下的法律制度研究幾乎還是一片空白。基于此，本文在對大量資料進(jìn)行分析和整理后，提出了適用于我國的電子證據(jù)綜合取證模型及模型下法律規(guī)則的構(gòu)想。 論文共四章，第一章明確了電子證據(jù)取證模型的概念、特征以及與相關(guān)概念的辨析；第二章介紹了國外的幾種主要的電子證據(jù)取證模型，并進(jìn)行了比較和評價，為我國電子證據(jù)取證模型的構(gòu)建提供了參考；第三、四章為本文的重點(diǎn)，不僅確立了適用于我國的電子證據(jù)綜合取證模型，還明確了模型下法律規(guī)則的內(nèi)容。具體如下。 第一章介紹了電子證據(jù)取證模型的界定。電子證據(jù)取證模型是指為了保護(hù)、收集、確認(rèn)、識別、分析、解釋以及呈現(xiàn)電子證據(jù)，能夠促進(jìn)與推動重構(gòu)犯罪事實(shí)，或是幫助預(yù)見未經(jīng)授權(quán)的破壞性違法行為，獨(dú)立于任何特定技術(shù)和組織環(huán)境的、被類型化概括和抽象的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)化取證過程。電子證據(jù)取證模型的特征體現(xiàn)在獨(dú)立性、標(biāo)準(zhǔn)化以及導(dǎo)向性。電子證據(jù)取證模型與電子證據(jù)取證程序、電子證據(jù)取證調(diào)查存在區(qū)別。 第二章介紹了電子證據(jù)取證模型的國外考察�？偟膩碚f，電子證據(jù)取證模型研究經(jīng)歷了從理論奠基期到理論成熟期的發(fā)展歷程。國外主要的電子證據(jù)取證模型有：基本過程模型、事件響應(yīng)過程模型、法律執(zhí)行過程模型、過程抽象模型、集成的數(shù)字取證模型、擴(kuò)展的網(wǎng)絡(luò)犯罪調(diào)查模型、調(diào)和的取證調(diào)查過程模型。它們的適用范圍和具體內(nèi)容都有差異，這些差異也體現(xiàn)出了模型的優(yōu)劣。 第三章介紹了我國電子證據(jù)取證模型的確立。本文通過分析我國電子證據(jù)取證模型理論研究的現(xiàn)狀與不足，參考國外的幾種主要電子證據(jù)取證模型，并結(jié)合我國法律理念、立法、司法等因素，，提出了電子證據(jù)綜合取證模型。這個模型具備三個前后相繼的階段：準(zhǔn)備階段、調(diào)查階段以及后續(xù)階段。其中，準(zhǔn)備階段主要是人員和設(shè)備的準(zhǔn)備，此外，從準(zhǔn)備階段開始應(yīng)構(gòu)建證據(jù)監(jiān)督鏈，并貫穿取證始終。調(diào)查階段根據(jù)調(diào)查重點(diǎn)不同進(jìn)一步分為兩個子階段：事件調(diào)查階段和取證調(diào)查階段。事件調(diào)查階段只有偵測一個環(huán)節(jié)；取證調(diào)查階段包含保護(hù)、收集與保全、檢驗與分析、提交四個環(huán)節(jié)。后續(xù)階段是取證工作的一些善后事宜，包含后處理（保管、移交、返還證據(jù)）與信息反饋兩個環(huán)節(jié)。 第四章介紹了電子證據(jù)綜合取證模型下的法律規(guī)則內(nèi)容，對涉及到的一些法律問題進(jìn)行了闡述。
[Abstract]:Electronic evidence forensics model is a cross-disciplinary research field, it is the standardization process of electronic forensics.In foreign countries, the research of electronic evidence collection model has been more mature, and some countries have absorbed the reasonable elements of electronic evidence collection model when making and perfecting their national electronic evidence legislation.It has a good effect on the procedure of electronic evidence collection.Up to now, there are few scholars studying the evidence model of electronic evidence, especially the research of legal system under the model of evidence collection of electronic evidence is almost a blank.Based on this, this paper analyzes and arranges a large amount of data, and puts forward a comprehensive evidence collection model suitable for our country and the conception of legal rules under the model.There are four chapters in this paper. The first chapter defines the concept, characteristics and related concepts of electronic evidence collection model, the second chapter introduces several main electronic evidence collection models abroad, and compares and evaluates them.It provides a reference for the construction of the evidence collection model of electronic evidence in our country. The third and fourth chapters are the emphases of this paper. It not only establishes the comprehensive forensics model for electronic evidence in our country, but also clarifies the content of the legal rules under the model.The details are as follows.The first chapter introduces the definition of electronic evidence collection model.The electronic evidence collection model means that to protect, collect, confirm, identify, analyze, interpret and present electronic evidence, it can promote and promote the reconstruction of criminal facts, or help foresee unauthorized destructive violations.A standardized forensics process that is typified, generalized and abstracted, independent of any particular technical and organizational environment.The characteristics of electronic evidence collection model are independence, standardization and orientation.There are differences between electronic evidence collection model and electronic evidence collection procedure.The second chapter introduces the foreign investigation of electronic evidence collection model.In general, the research of electronic evidence collection model has experienced the development from the theoretical foundation period to the theoretical maturity period.Reconciliation of the process of forensic investigation model.Their scope of application and specific content are different, these differences also reflect the advantages and disadvantages of the model.Based on the analysis of the current situation and deficiency of the research on the evidence collection model of electronic evidence in our country, this paper refers to several main models of evidence collection of electronic evidence in foreign countries, and combines the legal concept, legislation, judicature and other factors of our country.A comprehensive evidence collection model for electronic evidence is proposed.The model has three successive stages: preparation, investigation and follow-up.The preparation stage is mainly the preparation of personnel and equipment, in addition, the chain of evidence supervision should be constructed from the stage of preparation, and always through the evidence collection.The investigation stage is further divided into two sub-stages according to the different focus of investigation: the incident investigation stage and the evidential investigation stage.There is only one link in the investigation stage of the incident, and four links are included in the investigation stage: protection, collection and preservation, inspection and analysis, and submission.The following stage is the post-processing (custody, transfer, return of evidence) and information feedback.The fourth chapter introduces the content of legal rules under the model of comprehensive evidence collection of electronic evidence, and expounds some legal problems involved.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：重慶郵電大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D915.13

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 夏斌;李婭莉;肖鵬;葉晶;;服務(wù)器系統(tǒng)日志的證據(jù)法規(guī)制芻議[J];重慶郵電學(xué)院學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2006年01期

2 汪振林;;電子文書的原本性確保及其證明問題[J];重慶郵電大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2011年05期

3 吳同;楊永川;;云計算環(huán)境下的取證研究[J];電信科學(xué);2010年12期

4 丁麗萍 ,王永吉;多維計算機(jī)取證模型研究[J];計算機(jī)安全;2005年11期

5 周婷;宋如順;張媛;;基于安全態(tài)勢評估的數(shù)字取證模型研究[J];計算機(jī)安全;2011年04期

6 張楚;張樊;;網(wǎng)絡(luò)取證中的若干問題研究[J];證據(jù)科學(xué);2007年Z1期

7 劉品新;;電子取證的法律規(guī)制[J];法學(xué)家;2010年03期

8 丁麗萍;論計算機(jī)取證的原則和步驟[J];中國人民公安大學(xué)學(xué)報(自然科學(xué)版);2005年01期

9 張琳;試論我國法治進(jìn)程中法的正義價值取向[J];廣西民族學(xué)院學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2003年03期

10 鄭澤善;;網(wǎng)絡(luò)虛擬財產(chǎn)的刑法保護(hù)[J];甘肅政法學(xué)院學(xué)報;2012年05期

本文編號：1697545