人權(quán)保護(hù)視角下的取保候?qū)徶贫妊芯?/H1>
發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-04-01 21:38
本文選題：取保候?qū)?/strong> 切入點(diǎn)：保釋 出處：《吉首大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文
【摘要】：取保候?qū)徥俏覈淌略V訟五種強(qiáng)制措施中的一種，對我國刑事訴訟過程起著非常重要的作用。在刑事訴訟過程中，確立取保候?qū)彽哪康牟粌H是為了訴訟的順利進(jìn)行，更重要的是為了實(shí)現(xiàn)公民的人身自由權(quán)。但是目前刑事訴訟法中關(guān)于取保候?qū)彽闹贫纫?guī)定不完整，法律界定不明晰，給予司法機(jī)關(guān)很大的自由裁量權(quán)，導(dǎo)致我國取保候?qū)徃吡b押率、低取保率的適用現(xiàn)狀。在此過程中我國犯罪嫌疑人、被告人的人權(quán)往往受到侵害。在2012年新修訂的刑事訴訟法當(dāng)中對取保候?qū)徱参醋鬏^大的改革，我國被追訴人的人權(quán)仍舊未能得到很好的保護(hù)。隨著國際人權(quán)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)和法治發(fā)達(dá)國家對人權(quán)保護(hù)的呼聲日益高漲，在發(fā)揮人權(quán)保障作用方面，我國取保候?qū)徶贫仍桨l(fā)顯得舉足輕重。相比之下，英美法系國家的保釋制度在限制國家公權(quán)力的同時(shí)保障了公民個(gè)人人權(quán)，實(shí)現(xiàn)了程序正義，節(jié)約了司法資源。 為了更好的完善我國的取保候?qū)徶贫龋瑸榱烁辛Φ乇Ｕ衔覈缸锵右扇�、被告人的人�?quán)，本文主要是從立法理念和司法實(shí)踐兩方面著手，從宏觀和微觀兩個(gè)維度出發(fā)，在剖析取保候?qū)徟c人權(quán)保障關(guān)系的基礎(chǔ)上，挖掘現(xiàn)行取保候?qū)徶贫仍谠O(shè)立本制度的立法理念層面與具體制度本身層面存有的一些痼疾，論述設(shè)立我國取保候?qū)徶贫鹊姆晒δ芘c法律價(jià)值，，結(jié)合國際人權(quán)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的有關(guān)規(guī)定，借鑒西方法治發(fā)達(dá)國家保釋制度的優(yōu)點(diǎn)，提出進(jìn)一步完善我國取保候?qū)彽膶Σ撸赃M(jìn)一步解決我國取保候?qū)徶贫热匀淮嬖诘膯栴}。 本文首先闡述我國取保候?qū)徶贫茸罨靖拍畹慕缍ǎㄈ”：驅(qū)彽母拍�、取保候�(qū)彽倪m用條件、取保候?qū)彽膶傩砸约叭”：驅(qū)彽墓δ�，還有取保候?qū)徶贫扰c人權(quán)保障二者之間的關(guān)系等等基本理論，使人們對取保候?qū)忂@一制度有個(gè)全面了解。其次，論述當(dāng)前我國取保候?qū)徶贫仍谌藱?quán)保障方面仍然存在的不足，并相應(yīng)地分析存在這些不足的原因。再次，通過制度對比考察，討論了國際人權(quán)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)中對刑事司法領(lǐng)域的取保候?qū)徶贫鹊囊?guī)定以及西方法治發(fā)達(dá)國家對保釋制度的相關(guān)規(guī)定狀況。最后，從價(jià)值理念層面、立法理論層面上論述在奉行人權(quán)理念的同時(shí)，如何重新認(rèn)識和完善取保候?qū)徶贫�，使之更好地貫徹人�?quán)理念。
[Abstract]:Bail awaiting trial is one of the five compulsory measures in criminal procedure in China, which plays a very important role in the process of criminal procedure in our country.In the process of criminal proceedings, the purpose of establishing bail pending trial is not only for the smooth progress of the proceedings, but also for the realization of citizens' right to personal liberty.However, the system of obtaining bail pending trial in the current criminal procedure law is incomplete, the definition of the law is not clear, and the judicial organs are given great discretion, which leads to the application of high detention rate and low bail rate in our country.In this process, the human rights of suspects and defendants are often violated.In the newly revised Criminal procedure Law of 2012, there is no great reform on the bail pending trial, and the human rights of the persons prosecuted in our country are still not well protected.With the international human rights standards and the rule of law in developed countries for the protection of human rights voice is growing, in the role of human rights protection, the system of bail waiting for trial has become more and more important.In contrast, the bail system in common law countries not only limits the public power of the state, but also protects the individual human rights of citizens, realizes procedural justice and saves judicial resources.In order to better improve the system of obtaining bail pending trial in our country, in order to protect the human rights of suspects and defendants in our country, this paper mainly starts from two aspects of legislative idea and judicial practice, starting from the macro and micro dimensions.Based on the analysis of the relationship between bail pending trial and human rights protection, this paper explores some chronic problems existing in the current bail pending trial system at the level of the legislative concept of establishing this system and the level of the concrete system itself.This paper discusses the legal function and legal value of establishing the bail pending trial system in our country, combines with the relevant provisions of international human rights standards, draws lessons from the advantages of bail system in developed countries ruled by law in the west, and puts forward some countermeasures to further perfect the bail pending trial system in our country.In order to further solve the system of bail pending trial in China still exist problems.This paper first describes the definition of the most basic concepts of the system of obtaining bail pending trial in our country, including the concept of obtaining bail pending trial, the applicable conditions of obtaining bail pending trial, the attribute of obtaining bail pending trial and the function of obtaining bail pending trial.There is also the basic theory of the relationship between the system of bail pending trial and the guarantee of human rights, which makes people have a comprehensive understanding of the system.Secondly, it discusses the shortcomings of the current bail pending trial system in human rights protection, and analyzes the reasons for these deficiencies.Thirdly, through the comparative investigation of the system, this paper discusses the provisions of the international human rights standards on the system of bail in the field of criminal justice and the relevant provisions of the bail system in the developed countries with the rule of law in the west.Finally, from the value concept level, the legislative theory level discusses how to re-understand and perfect the bail pending trial system while pursuing the concept of human rights, so as to make it better carry out the human rights concept.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：吉首大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D925.2
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 陳青華;陳揚(yáng)揚(yáng);;構(gòu)建取保候?qū)彊z察監(jiān)督制之探析[J];法治論壇;2010年03期
2 蔡兆偉;;論我國取保候?qū)徶贫却嬖诘娜毕菁跋嚓P(guān)對策[J];廣州市公安管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2008年01期
3 冀祥德;;論新《刑事訴訟法》人權(quán)保障的價(jià)值取向[J];中國司法;2012年07期
4 胡謙;;論未成年人取保候?qū)彽娘L(fēng)險(xiǎn)評估機(jī)制[J];淮海工學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2011年12期
5 史宏民;柳向紅;;取保候?qū)徳谒痉▽?shí)踐中存在的問題及對策[J];中國檢察官;2010年13期
6 孫長永;比較法視野中的刑事強(qiáng)制措施[J];法學(xué)研究;2005年01期
7 李忠誠;;取保候?qū)彽倪m用條件與執(zhí)行方式[J];人民檢察;2010年21期
8 唐磊;論我國取保候?qū)徶贫鹊耐晟芠J];社會(huì)科學(xué)研究;2005年01期
9 劉曉琳;;淺談新刑事訴訟法中被害人的人權(quán)保障問題[J];中國市場;2012年14期
10 曹普卿;;細(xì)化適用取保候?qū)徱?guī)定的幾點(diǎn)建議[J];人大建設(shè);2010年10期
相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條
1 尹曉紅;我國憲法中被追訴人獲得辯護(hù)權(quán)之保障[D];華東政法大學(xué);2011年
本文編號：1697400
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/susongfa/1697400.html
本文選題：取保候?qū)?/strong> 切入點(diǎn)：保釋 出處：《吉首大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文
【摘要】：取保候?qū)徥俏覈淌略V訟五種強(qiáng)制措施中的一種，對我國刑事訴訟過程起著非常重要的作用。在刑事訴訟過程中，確立取保候?qū)彽哪康牟粌H是為了訴訟的順利進(jìn)行，更重要的是為了實(shí)現(xiàn)公民的人身自由權(quán)。但是目前刑事訴訟法中關(guān)于取保候?qū)彽闹贫纫?guī)定不完整，法律界定不明晰，給予司法機(jī)關(guān)很大的自由裁量權(quán)，導(dǎo)致我國取保候?qū)徃吡b押率、低取保率的適用現(xiàn)狀。在此過程中我國犯罪嫌疑人、被告人的人權(quán)往往受到侵害。在2012年新修訂的刑事訴訟法當(dāng)中對取保候?qū)徱参醋鬏^大的改革，我國被追訴人的人權(quán)仍舊未能得到很好的保護(hù)。隨著國際人權(quán)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)和法治發(fā)達(dá)國家對人權(quán)保護(hù)的呼聲日益高漲，在發(fā)揮人權(quán)保障作用方面，我國取保候?qū)徶贫仍桨l(fā)顯得舉足輕重。相比之下，英美法系國家的保釋制度在限制國家公權(quán)力的同時(shí)保障了公民個(gè)人人權(quán)，實(shí)現(xiàn)了程序正義，節(jié)約了司法資源。 為了更好的完善我國的取保候?qū)徶贫龋瑸榱烁辛Φ乇Ｕ衔覈缸锵右扇�、被告人的人�?quán)，本文主要是從立法理念和司法實(shí)踐兩方面著手，從宏觀和微觀兩個(gè)維度出發(fā)，在剖析取保候?qū)徟c人權(quán)保障關(guān)系的基礎(chǔ)上，挖掘現(xiàn)行取保候?qū)徶贫仍谠O(shè)立本制度的立法理念層面與具體制度本身層面存有的一些痼疾，論述設(shè)立我國取保候?qū)徶贫鹊姆晒δ芘c法律價(jià)值，，結(jié)合國際人權(quán)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的有關(guān)規(guī)定，借鑒西方法治發(fā)達(dá)國家保釋制度的優(yōu)點(diǎn)，提出進(jìn)一步完善我國取保候?qū)彽膶Σ撸赃M(jìn)一步解決我國取保候?qū)徶贫热匀淮嬖诘膯栴}。 本文首先闡述我國取保候?qū)徶贫茸罨靖拍畹慕缍ǎㄈ”：驅(qū)彽母拍�、取保候�(qū)彽倪m用條件、取保候?qū)彽膶傩砸约叭”：驅(qū)彽墓δ�，還有取保候?qū)徶贫扰c人權(quán)保障二者之間的關(guān)系等等基本理論，使人們對取保候?qū)忂@一制度有個(gè)全面了解。其次，論述當(dāng)前我國取保候?qū)徶贫仍谌藱?quán)保障方面仍然存在的不足，并相應(yīng)地分析存在這些不足的原因。再次，通過制度對比考察，討論了國際人權(quán)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)中對刑事司法領(lǐng)域的取保候?qū)徶贫鹊囊?guī)定以及西方法治發(fā)達(dá)國家對保釋制度的相關(guān)規(guī)定狀況。最后，從價(jià)值理念層面、立法理論層面上論述在奉行人權(quán)理念的同時(shí)，如何重新認(rèn)識和完善取保候?qū)徶贫�，使之更好地貫徹人�?quán)理念。
[Abstract]:Bail awaiting trial is one of the five compulsory measures in criminal procedure in China, which plays a very important role in the process of criminal procedure in our country.In the process of criminal proceedings, the purpose of establishing bail pending trial is not only for the smooth progress of the proceedings, but also for the realization of citizens' right to personal liberty.However, the system of obtaining bail pending trial in the current criminal procedure law is incomplete, the definition of the law is not clear, and the judicial organs are given great discretion, which leads to the application of high detention rate and low bail rate in our country.In this process, the human rights of suspects and defendants are often violated.In the newly revised Criminal procedure Law of 2012, there is no great reform on the bail pending trial, and the human rights of the persons prosecuted in our country are still not well protected.With the international human rights standards and the rule of law in developed countries for the protection of human rights voice is growing, in the role of human rights protection, the system of bail waiting for trial has become more and more important.In contrast, the bail system in common law countries not only limits the public power of the state, but also protects the individual human rights of citizens, realizes procedural justice and saves judicial resources.In order to better improve the system of obtaining bail pending trial in our country, in order to protect the human rights of suspects and defendants in our country, this paper mainly starts from two aspects of legislative idea and judicial practice, starting from the macro and micro dimensions.Based on the analysis of the relationship between bail pending trial and human rights protection, this paper explores some chronic problems existing in the current bail pending trial system at the level of the legislative concept of establishing this system and the level of the concrete system itself.This paper discusses the legal function and legal value of establishing the bail pending trial system in our country, combines with the relevant provisions of international human rights standards, draws lessons from the advantages of bail system in developed countries ruled by law in the west, and puts forward some countermeasures to further perfect the bail pending trial system in our country.In order to further solve the system of bail pending trial in China still exist problems.This paper first describes the definition of the most basic concepts of the system of obtaining bail pending trial in our country, including the concept of obtaining bail pending trial, the applicable conditions of obtaining bail pending trial, the attribute of obtaining bail pending trial and the function of obtaining bail pending trial.There is also the basic theory of the relationship between the system of bail pending trial and the guarantee of human rights, which makes people have a comprehensive understanding of the system.Secondly, it discusses the shortcomings of the current bail pending trial system in human rights protection, and analyzes the reasons for these deficiencies.Thirdly, through the comparative investigation of the system, this paper discusses the provisions of the international human rights standards on the system of bail in the field of criminal justice and the relevant provisions of the bail system in the developed countries with the rule of law in the west.Finally, from the value concept level, the legislative theory level discusses how to re-understand and perfect the bail pending trial system while pursuing the concept of human rights, so as to make it better carry out the human rights concept.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：吉首大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D925.2
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 陳青華;陳揚(yáng)揚(yáng);;構(gòu)建取保候?qū)彊z察監(jiān)督制之探析[J];法治論壇;2010年03期
2 蔡兆偉;;論我國取保候?qū)徶贫却嬖诘娜毕菁跋嚓P(guān)對策[J];廣州市公安管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2008年01期
3 冀祥德;;論新《刑事訴訟法》人權(quán)保障的價(jià)值取向[J];中國司法;2012年07期
4 胡謙;;論未成年人取保候?qū)彽娘L(fēng)險(xiǎn)評估機(jī)制[J];淮海工學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2011年12期
5 史宏民;柳向紅;;取保候?qū)徳谒痉▽?shí)踐中存在的問題及對策[J];中國檢察官;2010年13期
6 孫長永;比較法視野中的刑事強(qiáng)制措施[J];法學(xué)研究;2005年01期
7 李忠誠;;取保候?qū)彽倪m用條件與執(zhí)行方式[J];人民檢察;2010年21期
8 唐磊;論我國取保候?qū)徶贫鹊耐晟芠J];社會(huì)科學(xué)研究;2005年01期
9 劉曉琳;;淺談新刑事訴訟法中被害人的人權(quán)保障問題[J];中國市場;2012年14期
10 曹普卿;;細(xì)化適用取保候?qū)徱?guī)定的幾點(diǎn)建議[J];人大建設(shè);2010年10期
相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條
1 尹曉紅;我國憲法中被追訴人獲得辯護(hù)權(quán)之保障[D];華東政法大學(xué);2011年
本文編號：1697400
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/susongfa/1697400.html
最近更新
教材專著
