本文選題：第三人撤銷之訴　切入點(diǎn)：實(shí)體權(quán)益　出處：《天津師范大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：新民事訴訟法中第五十六條第三款新增了“第三人撤銷之訴”。作為本次民事訴訟法修改中增設(shè)的一種新的訴訟程序和訴訟種類,引起了民事訴訟法學(xué)界的廣泛探討,因此深入剖析第三人撤銷之訴制度的法律內(nèi)涵,揭示該制度如何在法律實(shí)務(wù)中更好的具體運(yùn)用便成為一種必然。 本文從結(jié)構(gòu)上分為三大部分,具體包括引言、正文和結(jié)語(yǔ)。其中正文分為五章,第一章主要分析了第三人撤銷之訴的基礎(chǔ)理論,具體包括第三人撤銷之訴適用的前提條件、適格主體、訴訟標(biāo)的、提起的期限及管轄法院,旨在更好的理解第三人撤銷之訴制度的法律規(guī)定以及理論基礎(chǔ)。第二章是對(duì)我國(guó)第三人撤銷之訴制度的性質(zhì)界定,根據(jù)第三人撤銷之訴的內(nèi)涵分析和理論界的通說(shuō),學(xué)者們一般認(rèn)為我國(guó)的第三人撤銷之訴制度屬于形成之訴的范圍,而且是一種事后的程序保障制度和非常救濟(jì)制度。第三章是第三人撤銷之訴制度與我國(guó)相關(guān)制度的比較。通過(guò)研究我國(guó)新設(shè)立的第三人撤銷之訴制度與我國(guó)的案外人申請(qǐng)?jiān)賹徶贫�、�?zhí)行程序中的案外人異議之訴制度的異同點(diǎn),更好的理解第三人撤銷之訴作為一種事后保障程序的法律性質(zhì)以及價(jià)值追求。第四章是我國(guó)第三人撤銷之訴制度與域外國(guó)家和地區(qū)的第三人撤銷之訴制度的比較,主要是對(duì)法國(guó)案外人異議之訴、臺(tái)灣地區(qū)第三人撤銷之訴制度和澳門地區(qū)的第三人撤銷之訴制度的異同點(diǎn)分析,以此更加深入全面的理解第三人撤銷之訴制度的現(xiàn)實(shí)需求以及我國(guó)民事訴訟法設(shè)立此制度的必要性。第五章是第三人撤銷之訴制度在我國(guó)法律實(shí)務(wù)界的具體運(yùn)用,通過(guò)廣東省高級(jí)人民法院(2013)粵高法立民終字第401號(hào)案件為例,全面分析第三人撤銷之訴制度在我國(guó)司法實(shí)踐中的具體運(yùn)用,并針對(duì)第三人撤銷之訴在實(shí)務(wù)中出現(xiàn)的問(wèn)題提出筆者的看法。這一部分的內(nèi)容不僅僅是針對(duì)第三人撤銷之訴制度在本案例中出現(xiàn)的問(wèn)題進(jìn)行分析,也對(duì)以后的司法實(shí)踐中預(yù)期可能出現(xiàn)的一些問(wèn)題進(jìn)行研究,以期為我國(guó)在未來(lái)的法律實(shí)務(wù)運(yùn)作中提供參考和借鑒,從而更好的推動(dòng)我國(guó)的司法制度建設(shè)。
[Abstract]:Article 56, paragraph 3, of the new civil procedure law adds "the action of revocation of the third party". As a new procedure and kind of action added in the revision of the civil procedure law, it has caused extensive discussion in the field of civil procedural law. Therefore, it is inevitable to deeply analyze the legal connotation of the system of the third party's revocation, and to reveal how the system can be better applied in the practice of law. This article is divided into three parts from the structure, including the introduction, the text and the conclusion. The text is divided into five chapters. The first chapter mainly analyzes the basic theory of the third party revocation action, including the specific conditions of the application of the third party revocation action. In order to better understand the legal provisions and the theoretical basis of the system of the third party's revocation, the second chapter defines the nature of the system of the third party's revocation in our country, which is the subject of the suit, the object of the lawsuit, the time limit of filing, and the jurisdiction of the court, in order to better understand the legal provisions and the theoretical basis of the system. According to the analysis of the connotation of the third party's revocation action and the general theory of the theoretical circle, scholars generally think that the system of the third party's revocation action in our country belongs to the scope of the formed action. The third chapter is the comparison between the system of the third party's revocation and the related system of our country. By studying the newly established system of the third party's revocation in our country and the case of our country, it is a kind of procedural safeguard system and extraordinary relief system. The system of application for retrial by outsiders, The similarities and differences of the system of dissenting action by outsiders in the execution procedure, The fourth chapter is the comparison between the third party revocation action system in China and the third party revocation action system in foreign countries and regions, and a better understanding of the legal nature and value pursuit of the third party revocation action as a kind of ex post facto safeguard procedure, the fourth chapter is the comparison between the third party revocation action system in China and the third party revocation action system in foreign countries and regions. It mainly analyzes the similarities and differences between the dissenting action of the outsider in the French case, the system of the third party's revocation in Taiwan and the system of the third party's revocation in Macao. The fifth chapter is about the practical application of the third party revocation action system in the legal practice of our country, and the necessity of establishing this system in our country's civil procedure law, the fifth chapter is the concrete application of the third party revocation action system in our country's legal practice. Taking Guangdong Provincial higher people's Court as an example, the author analyzes the specific application of the third party's revocation system in the judicial practice of our country. In this part, the author not only analyzes the problems of the third party revocation system in this case, but also puts forward the author's opinion on the third party revocation action in practice. In order to provide reference and reference for our country in the future legal practice, we can promote the construction of our judicial system better by studying some problems that may appear in the judicial practice in the future.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：天津師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D925.1
，

本文編號(hào)：1678910