本文選題：刑事被害人　切入點(diǎn)：救助　出處：《中國(guó)社會(huì)科學(xué)院研究生院》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：隨著被害人學(xué)的不斷發(fā)展，被害人相關(guān)救助制度也在不斷完善。目前世界上許多國(guó)家已經(jīng)通過(guò)立法來(lái)確立了自己的刑事被害人相關(guān)救助制度，相應(yīng)的，我國(guó)也通過(guò)一系列的司法實(shí)踐推動(dòng)了該項(xiàng)制度的確立和不斷深化。本文從被害人學(xué)的發(fā)展歷史角度出發(fā)，闡釋了刑事被害人救助制度的理論基礎(chǔ)，將各國(guó)現(xiàn)行立法中的有關(guān)刑事被害人的損害賠償進(jìn)行了分類(lèi)，并對(duì)各國(guó)的刑事被害人救助制度做了梳理，以期達(dá)到對(duì)我國(guó)的刑事被害人制度建立后的實(shí)效問(wèn)題作出分析探討的目的，并在最后提出了對(duì)健全刑事被害人救助制度的構(gòu)想。 在刑事附帶民事訴訟中，由于被告人的賠償能力不足的問(wèn)題，刑事被害人在判決中所獲得的賠償在實(shí)際中的落實(shí)幾率往往只有20%，我國(guó)的刑事被害人救助制度也正是在此基礎(chǔ)上應(yīng)運(yùn)而生的。但自從2004年地方司法機(jī)關(guān)的試點(diǎn)嘗試，，直至2009年中央8部委聯(lián)合發(fā)布的《關(guān)于開(kāi)展刑事被害人救助工作的若干意見(jiàn)》頒行至今，這一制度的建立雖然解決了一部分刑事被害人及其家屬的生活困難，但同時(shí)也還存在各種問(wèn)題，從而導(dǎo)致大量被害人及其家屬并未受惠�；谝陨鲜聦�(shí)，筆者試圖通過(guò)案例對(duì)于這一制度進(jìn)行反思，探討其失效的原因，從而使被害人合法權(quán)益的長(zhǎng)效保護(hù)成為可能。
[Abstract]:With the continuous development of victim science, the victim related relief system is also constantly improved. At present, many countries in the world have established their own criminal victim related relief system through legislation. Through a series of judicial practices, China has also promoted the establishment and deepening of the system. From the perspective of the history of the development of victimology, this paper explains the theoretical basis of the criminal victim relief system. It classifies the damage compensation of the criminal victim in the current legislation of various countries, and combs the relief system of the criminal victim in various countries. In order to achieve the purpose of analyzing and discussing the actual effect after the establishment of criminal victim system in our country, and finally put forward the idea of perfecting the criminal victim relief system. In a civil suit incidental to a criminal case, due to the lack of compensation capacity of the defendant, The criminal victim's compensation in the judgment is usually only 20% in practice, and the criminal victim relief system in our country has emerged on this basis. However, since the trial of the local judicial organs in 2004, Until 2009, when the Central Committee of 8 ministries and commissions jointly issued several opinions on the implementation of the Criminal victim Relief work, the establishment of this system has solved the living difficulties of some criminal victims and their families, although the establishment of the system has solved the difficulties of some criminal victims and their families. But at the same time, there are also various problems, resulting in a large number of victims and their families did not benefit. Based on the above facts, the author tries to reflect on the system through cases, and explore the reasons for its failure. Thus, the long-term protection of the victim's legitimate rights and interests becomes possible.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中國(guó)社會(huì)科學(xué)院研究生院
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D925.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前3條

1 肖建華;刑事附帶民事訴訟制度的內(nèi)在沖突與協(xié)調(diào)[J];法學(xué)研究;2001年06期

2 陳瑞華;;刑事附帶民事訴訟的三種模式[J];法學(xué)研究;2009年01期

3 趙國(guó)玲;;犯罪被害人補(bǔ)償：國(guó)際最新動(dòng)態(tài)與國(guó)內(nèi)制度構(gòu)建[J];人民檢察;2006年17期

本文編號(hào)：1675849