本文選題：仲裁　切入點(diǎn)：財(cái)產(chǎn)保全　出處：《中國政法大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：仲裁財(cái)產(chǎn)保全程序是仲裁制度中一項(xiàng)十分重要的程序,其設(shè)計(jì)的科學(xué)合理將有效保障未來生效仲裁裁決的執(zhí)行,收到良好的糾紛解決效果。而我國當(dāng)前立法對該程序并未予以充分重視,立法中的相關(guān)規(guī)定過于原則,不夠明確詳細(xì),與國際商事仲裁的理論發(fā)展和實(shí)踐需要嚴(yán)重脫節(jié)。本文就試圖將我國的仲裁財(cái)產(chǎn)保全程序做一系統(tǒng)梳理,通過與國際商事仲裁領(lǐng)域的立法例和實(shí)踐中做法進(jìn)行橫向比較,來找出我國的立法滯后和欠缺之處,同時(shí)通過與訴訟保全程序的對比研究,探索我國仲裁財(cái)產(chǎn)保全程序的立法完善之道。全文共分四章,第一章探討了仲裁財(cái)產(chǎn)保全的概念、程序性質(zhì)、程序設(shè)置、與相關(guān)制度的界限界定及其價(jià)值追求；第二章探析了財(cái)產(chǎn)保全的申請程序；第三章研究了財(cái)產(chǎn)保全的決定權(quán)和執(zhí)行權(quán)；第四章分析了我國財(cái)產(chǎn)保全的救濟(jì)程序。通過第一章理論鋪墊以期對仲裁財(cái)產(chǎn)保全程序有一個宏觀把握,筆者在后面四章中運(yùn)用大量對比研究的方法,分析了國際商事仲裁領(lǐng)域的通行做法和有效經(jīng)驗(yàn),探討我國相關(guān)立法的缺陷和未來需改進(jìn)完善之處：如申請程序中的擔(dān)保問題；仲裁財(cái)產(chǎn)保全的決定權(quán)歸屬問題；域外執(zhí)行規(guī)定的欠缺；救濟(jì)程序中的細(xì)化復(fù)議程序、增加財(cái)產(chǎn)保全解除的情形、增加第三人異議程序、細(xì)化申請錯誤賠償問題等。 筆者本欲進(jìn)行更深入細(xì)化的探討,以期提出更科學(xué)細(xì)化的立法完善建議,但由于該論題可供參考的資料有限,筆者囿于有限的理論水平和實(shí)踐經(jīng)驗(yàn),僅能作出此番探討,至少能拋磚引玉點(diǎn)出一些問題,在此懇請專家指導(dǎo)斧正。
[Abstract]:The procedure of preservation of arbitration property is a very important procedure in the arbitration system. The scientific and reasonable design of the procedure will effectively guarantee the execution of the arbitration award that will come into effect in the future. The current legislation of our country has not paid enough attention to this procedure, and the relevant provisions in the legislation are too principled and not clear and detailed. This paper tries to sort out the arbitration property preservation procedure of our country systematically, and makes a horizontal comparison with the legislation and practice in the field of international commercial arbitration. In order to find out the legislative lag and deficiency of our country, at the same time, through the comparative study with the litigation preservation procedure, it explores the way to perfect the legislation of our country's arbitration property preservation procedure. The paper is divided into four chapters, the first chapter discusses the concept of the arbitration property preservation. The nature of the procedure, the establishment of the procedure, the definition of the boundary with the relevant system and its value pursuit; the second chapter analyzes the application procedure of property preservation; the third chapter studies the right to decide and execute the property preservation; The fourth chapter analyzes the relief procedure of property preservation in our country. Through the theory of chapter 1, the author tries to have a macroscopic grasp of the procedure of arbitration property preservation. The author uses a large number of comparative research methods in the following four chapters. This paper analyzes the current practice and effective experience in the field of international commercial arbitration, and probes into the defects of the relevant legislation in our country and the improvement and perfection in the future, such as the guarantee in the application procedure, the ownership of the right to decide on the preservation of arbitration property; The deficiency of the extra-territorial enforcement; the detailed reconsideration procedure in the relief procedure, the increase of the situation of property preservation and release, the increase of the third party's dissent procedure, the refinement of the application for error compensation and so on. The author would like to make a more thorough and detailed discussion in order to put forward more scientific and detailed suggestions for legislative perfection. However, due to the limited information available for reference on this topic, the author can only make this discussion because of his limited theoretical level and practical experience. At least can point out some problems, in this request for expert guidance ax straight.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中國政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D925.7

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 蔣篤恒;;論財(cái)產(chǎn)保全的幾個問題[J];研究生法學(xué);1994年03期

2 喬欣;;論仲裁獨(dú)立性原則下的司法支持與監(jiān)督[J];中國司法;2009年06期

3 沈楊,朱業(yè)明;財(cái)產(chǎn)保全的法律性質(zhì)辨析[J];法律適用(國家法官學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào));2001年04期

4 呂欣;;關(guān)于完善我國商事仲裁司法監(jiān)督制度的思考[J];法律適用;2006年03期

5 李漢昌，，吳德橋;適用財(cái)產(chǎn)保全制度應(yīng)注意的幾個問題[J];法學(xué)評論;1996年04期

6 張春良;;論國際商事仲裁價(jià)值[J];河北法學(xué);2006年06期

7 張瀟劍;;論商事仲裁的司法監(jiān)督[J];清華法學(xué);2002年00期

8 于喜富;;論仲裁臨時(shí)救濟(jì)措施的決定與執(zhí)行[J];山東審判(山東法官培訓(xùn)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào));2006年01期

9 王艷陽;國際商事仲裁中的臨時(shí)保護(hù)措施制度——兼議我國相關(guān)制度的不足[J];西南政法大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2004年04期

10 喬欣,段莉;仲裁財(cái)產(chǎn)保全決定機(jī)構(gòu)之辯證與重構(gòu)[J];仲裁研究;2004年01期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 范毅強(qiáng);民事保全程序要論[D];西南政法大學(xué);2008年

2 金泳奎;中韓商事仲裁制度比較研究[D];中國政法大學(xué);2009年

本文編號：1658516