本文選題：未成年人　切入點：指定管轄　出處：《湘潭大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：未成年人刑事案件審判指定管轄作為指定管轄制度中的一種，既具有一般案件指定管轄的特點，即都是通過上級法院的指定確定某一案件的管轄法院；但又具有其特殊之處，它的適用既不是為了解決案件管轄不明的情況，也不是因為出現(xiàn)了需要回避等特殊事由，而是為了突出未成年人犯罪審判的特點，最大限度地保證未成年人犯罪量刑公平統(tǒng)一，同時也解決當(dāng)前我國各地區(qū)法院在未成年人犯罪審判投入不足，專業(yè)性不強的問題。作為一種特殊的程序，它的意義主要體現(xiàn)在推廣未成年人犯罪研究和維護(hù)未成年人權(quán)益上。然而，盡管這項制度在我國的適用已有十幾年的歷史，但無論是在立法上還是實踐中，專家學(xué)者對于這項制度的研究討論并不多，這也是制約其在我國普遍推廣的主要原因。由于缺乏立法、理論上的充分支持，不同地區(qū)的法院在具體運行這項制度時也都是按照自己的模式操作，在指定管轄法院的確定、案件適用范圍以及法院和公安檢察機(jī)關(guān)的銜接模式上都沒形成統(tǒng)一的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)，這些都成為了制度運行中面臨的困境。因此，我們有必要對這一制度進(jìn)行全面、深入的分析與了解并幫助其擺脫發(fā)展中的困境。 本文在結(jié)構(gòu)上分為四個部分，首先從未成年人刑事案件審判指定管轄的基礎(chǔ)性問題入手，通過對它的概念、發(fā)展模式、司法理念及學(xué)界爭議的闡述，明晰制度的基本內(nèi)涵；第二部分探討了制度的合理性與必要性，闡述了研究的目的及實行未成年人刑事案件審判指定管轄的意義；第三部分以我國立法與司法實踐為視角，分析我國未成年人刑事案件審判指定管轄面臨的現(xiàn)實困境與需要解決的問題；第四部分針對前文總結(jié)出的制度運行中遇到的問題，，一一提出切實可行的解決思路與方法。
[Abstract]:As one of the designated jurisdiction systems, the designated jurisdiction in juvenile criminal cases has the characteristics of general case designation, that is, the jurisdiction of a case is determined by the appointment of a higher court, but it has its special features. Its application is not to solve the situation of unclear jurisdiction of the case, nor because of special reasons such as the need to avoid it, but to highlight the characteristics of juvenile delinquency trial and to maximize the fairness and unity of sentencing for juvenile delinquency. At the same time, it also solves the problem of insufficient investment and lack of professionalism in juvenile delinquency trials in various district courts of our country. As a special procedure, Its significance is mainly reflected in promoting the research of juvenile delinquency and safeguarding the rights and interests of minors. However, although this system has been applied in our country for more than ten years, it is not only in legislation but also in practice. There is not much research and discussion among experts and scholars on this system, which is also the main reason that restricts its popularization in our country. Due to the lack of legislation, there is sufficient theoretical support. When the courts in different regions operate this system concretely, they also operate according to their own mode. There is no unified standard in the determination of designated jurisdiction courts, the scope of application of cases, and the mode of convergence between the courts and public security procuratorial organs. Therefore, it is necessary for us to make a comprehensive and in-depth analysis and understanding of the system and to help it get rid of the predicament in the course of development. This article is divided into four parts in structure. Firstly, it starts with the basic problems of assigned jurisdiction in juvenile criminal cases, and clarifies the basic connotation of the system through the elaboration of its concept, development model, judicial concept and academic controversy. The second part discusses the rationality and necessity of the system, expounds the purpose of the study and the significance of implementing the designated jurisdiction in juvenile criminal cases. The third part takes the legislation and judicial practice of our country as the angle of view. This paper analyzes the practical difficulties and problems to be solved in the assigned jurisdiction of juvenile criminal cases in our country. The fourth part puts forward practical ideas and methods to solve the problems encountered in the operation of the system summarized above.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：湘潭大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D925.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前7條

1 王磊;;我國未成年人刑事審判機(jī)構(gòu)設(shè)置之構(gòu)想[J];法制與社會;2009年28期

2 萬秀華;未成年人刑事案件指定管轄后新情況的思考[J];青少年犯罪問題;2000年05期

3 呂敏,朱國明,王宗光;成立我國少年法院的若干困惑解析[J];青少年犯罪問題;2001年05期

4 曾康;;少年刑事審判組織研究[J];青少年犯罪問題;2009年05期

5 應(yīng)培禮;;我國未成年人刑事案件“集中審理、指定管轄”原則的爭議與出路[J];南都學(xué)壇;2009年03期

6 呂敏,羅宏,王宗光;當(dāng)前少年刑事審判指定管轄的模式選擇[J];人民司法;2000年09期

7 胡云騰;;立足審判實踐 修改完善未成年人刑事訴訟司法解釋——未成年人刑事案件訴訟程序司法解釋介紹[J];預(yù)防青少年犯罪研究;2013年01期

本文編號：1652243