本文選題：電子數(shù)據(jù)　切入點(diǎn)：取證規(guī)范化　出處：《遼寧大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：社會的快速發(fā)展使得計算機(jī)技術(shù)、通訊技術(shù)日新月異,作為電子化、數(shù)字化電子數(shù)據(jù)信息,也愈發(fā)影響著人們的日常生活,2012年新《刑事訴訟法》也將電子數(shù)據(jù)列為一項新的法定證據(jù)類型。電子數(shù)據(jù)是信息化的數(shù)據(jù),具有無形性、信息脆弱性、易受破壞性等特點(diǎn),這特殊性對電子數(shù)據(jù)取證、認(rèn)證提出了特殊要求。但是目前我國電子數(shù)據(jù)的相關(guān)的證據(jù)規(guī)則仍不夠完善,取證規(guī)則、認(rèn)證規(guī)則依然存在許多不足。就取證方面而言,作為高科技性的電子數(shù)據(jù),取證主體、取證人員資格未作限定;電子數(shù)據(jù)的固定和保存必須依照嚴(yán)格的程序為進(jìn)行,以保證其完整性和連貫性,但是我國沒有構(gòu)建電子數(shù)據(jù)的證據(jù)保管鏈制度,故對偵查人員、偵查行為的約束程度不夠,容易導(dǎo)致電子數(shù)據(jù)客觀性、合法性、關(guān)聯(lián)性的缺失;電子數(shù)據(jù)電子數(shù)據(jù)的鑒定通常是為了偵查的繼續(xù)而進(jìn)行,鑒定存在嚴(yán)重的偵查依附性,需要相應(yīng)的措施去除偵查的依附性。就認(rèn)證方面而言,首先我國沒有單獨(dú)的電子數(shù)據(jù)法,缺乏體系化的規(guī)范指引,需要構(gòu)建相應(yīng)的證據(jù)法律體系;其次,電子數(shù)據(jù)的認(rèn)證、審查判斷規(guī)則不盡完善,對最佳證據(jù)規(guī)則、可采性規(guī)則、補(bǔ)強(qiáng)規(guī)則的細(xì)化不夠,不利于法庭對電子數(shù)據(jù)的質(zhì)證和審查判斷,進(jìn)而影響訴訟程序的進(jìn)行。再之,新刑訴法雖然新規(guī)定了專家輔助人制度,但是電子數(shù)據(jù)有其特殊性,故對電子數(shù)據(jù)的專家輔助人制度應(yīng)特殊對待。但我國對這方面的法律法規(guī)較少,且多為原則性的規(guī)定,缺乏可操作性,有必要健全和完善電子數(shù)據(jù)方面的專家輔助人制度。本文的邏輯結(jié)構(gòu)如下:首先介紹了電子數(shù)據(jù)的概念和特征,對電子數(shù)據(jù)的特殊性進(jìn)行詳解。其次第二部分介紹了域外電子數(shù)據(jù)的取證、認(rèn)證制度,對國外電子數(shù)據(jù)制度進(jìn)行了分析。接著筆者討論了我國電子數(shù)據(jù)取證規(guī)則的不足以及取證規(guī)范化面臨的問題,并重點(diǎn)論及了解決途徑和筆者的建議。最后論述了我國電子數(shù)據(jù)認(rèn)證規(guī)范化面臨的問題,且重點(diǎn)論述了筆者完善意見和建議。
[Abstract]:With the rapid development of society, computer technology and communication technology are changing with each passing day. As electronic and digital electronic data information, In 2012, the new Criminal procedure Law also listed electronic data as a new type of statutory evidence. Electronic data is information based data, with the characteristics of invisibility, information vulnerability, vulnerability, and so on. This particularity puts forward special requirements for electronic data forensics and authentication. However, at present, the relevant evidence rules of electronic data in our country are still not perfect, and there are still many deficiencies in the rules of evidence collection and authentication. As high-tech electronic data, the subject of evidence collection, the qualification of forensics personnel is not limited; the fixation and preservation of electronic data must be carried out in accordance with strict procedures in order to ensure its integrity and consistency, But our country does not construct the evidence chain system of electronic data, so to investigators, the degree of restriction of investigation behavior is not enough, which can easily lead to the lack of objectivity, legitimacy and relevance of electronic data. The identification of electronic data is usually carried out for the purpose of the continuation of investigation. There is serious investigative dependence in the identification, and corresponding measures are needed to remove the dependence of investigation. As far as authentication is concerned, first of all, there is no separate electronic data method in our country. Lack of systematic normative guidance, need to build a corresponding legal system of evidence; secondly, the authentication of electronic data, review and judgment rules are not perfect, for the best rules of evidence, admissibility rules, reinforcement rules of refinement is not enough, It is unfavorable for the court to cross-examine and examine the electronic data, thus affecting the proceeding of the lawsuit. Secondly, although the new Criminal procedure Law provides for the expert assistant system, the electronic data has its particularity. Therefore, the expert assistant system of electronic data should be treated specially. However, there are few laws and regulations in this field in our country, and most of them are rules of principle, so they are lack of maneuverability. It is necessary to perfect the expert assistant system in electronic data. The logical structure of this paper is as follows: firstly, the concept and characteristics of electronic data are introduced. The particularity of electronic data is explained in detail. Secondly, the second part introduces the evidence collection and authentication system of electronic data outside the country. This paper analyzes the electronic data system in foreign countries. Then the author discusses the shortcomings of the rules of electronic data collection in China and the problems faced by the standardization of evidence collection. Finally, the paper discusses the problems faced by the standardization of electronic data authentication in China, and puts emphasis on the author's opinions and suggestions on how to improve the authentication of electronic data.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：遼寧大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D925.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 王朋;;刑事訴訟中電子數(shù)據(jù)及其相關(guān)概念辨析[J];山西警官高等專科學(xué)校學(xué)報;2015年01期

2 王志剛;;論電子數(shù)據(jù)提取筆錄的屬性與適用[J];證據(jù)科學(xué);2014年06期

3 陳永生;;電子數(shù)據(jù)搜查、扣押的法律規(guī)制[J];現(xiàn)代法學(xué);2014年05期

4 高波;;大數(shù)據(jù):電子數(shù)據(jù)證據(jù)的挑戰(zhàn)與機(jī)遇[J];重慶大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2014年03期

5 鐘華;;新刑訴法下電子數(shù)據(jù)相關(guān)問題的探討[J];法制與社會;2014年07期

6 王敏遠(yuǎn);祁建建;;電子數(shù)據(jù)的收集、固定和運(yùn)用的程序規(guī)范問題研究[J];法律適用;2014年03期

7 龍宗智;孫末非;;非鑒定專家制度在我國刑事訴訟中的完善[J];吉林大學(xué)社會科學(xué)學(xué)報;2014年01期

8 謝勇;;論電子數(shù)據(jù)的審查和判斷[J];法律適用;2014年01期

9 熊志海;孔言;;電子數(shù)據(jù)證據(jù)及相關(guān)概念之比較研究[J];湖北社會科學(xué);2013年12期

10 汪振林;吳思穎;;刑事證據(jù)證實(shí)方法體系研究[J];河北法學(xué);2013年09期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 趙長江;刑事電子數(shù)據(jù)證據(jù)規(guī)則研究[D];西南政法大學(xué);2014年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前5條

1 朱文睿;電子數(shù)據(jù)認(rèn)證規(guī)則研究[D];華東政法大學(xué);2015年

2 高鴿;論電子數(shù)據(jù)運(yùn)用中的問題與對策[D];華東政法大學(xué);2014年

3 宋書琦;視聽資料和電子數(shù)據(jù)比較研究[D];燕山大學(xué);2013年

4 滕友娟;電子數(shù)據(jù)的證據(jù)效力問題研究[D];南京師范大學(xué);2011年

5 趙利杰;電子證據(jù)的若干法律問題研究[D];中國政法大學(xué);2004年

，

本文編號：1649689