本文選題：刑事訴訟　切入點(diǎn)：當(dāng)事人主義　出處：《暨南大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：大陸法系的職權(quán)主義訴訟模式和英美法系的當(dāng)事人主義訴訟模式是現(xiàn)今刑事訴訟制度中的兩大訴訟模式,其中當(dāng)事人主義訴訟模式是由早期的彈劾式訴訟發(fā)展而來,逐漸形成了控辯雙方主導(dǎo)、法官超然中立的訴訟格局。本文基于對(duì)當(dāng)事人主義訴訟模式的由來及特征分析,以當(dāng)事人主義對(duì)權(quán)利保障的理念為出發(fā)點(diǎn),分析這一訴訟模式對(duì)我國訴訟結(jié)構(gòu)產(chǎn)生的影響,從而發(fā)現(xiàn)其存在的弊端并找尋其在發(fā)展過程中的改革方向。本研究主要分為六部分。緒論部分介紹了選題的背景和意義、國內(nèi)外研究現(xiàn)狀、研究?jī)?nèi)容與研究方法。第二部分介紹當(dāng)事人主義訴訟模式的內(nèi)涵和由來。通過對(duì)當(dāng)事人主義訴訟模式的內(nèi)涵進(jìn)行梳理,為下文分析提供理論基礎(chǔ)。第三部分進(jìn)一步分析當(dāng)事人主義訴訟模式的制度特色。重點(diǎn)對(duì)當(dāng)事人主義訴訟模式的特色制度進(jìn)行深入分析,為分析當(dāng)事人主義訴訟模式的利弊打下基礎(chǔ)。第四部分是具體談?dòng)⒚绹倚淌略V訟制度的演變與發(fā)展。以英美國家典型的沉默權(quán)制度和非法證據(jù)排除制度的發(fā)展為例,梳理英美國家刑事訴訟模式的演變,為我國訴訟制度的發(fā)展提供經(jīng)驗(yàn)借鑒。第五部分是分析英美國家當(dāng)事人主義訴訟結(jié)構(gòu)對(duì)我國訴訟模式的影響。從我國訴訟模式的發(fā)展歷程以及2012年《刑事訴訟法》修改來分析英美國家當(dāng)事人主義模式對(duì)我國的影響。第六部分是展望當(dāng)事人主義訴訟模式的走向。通過對(duì)當(dāng)事人主義訴訟模式弊端的分析,對(duì)其改革走向做出判斷。首先,要強(qiáng)化審前程序中法官的裁定效力,其次,限制被告人的沉默權(quán),然后,增強(qiáng)法官在審判過程中的地位,最后,加強(qiáng)對(duì)被害人的人權(quán)保障。
[Abstract]:The functionalist litigation mode of civil law system and the litigant litigation mode of Anglo-American law system are two major litigation modes in the present criminal litigation system, among which the litigant litigation mode is developed from the early impeachment litigation. This article based on the analysis of the origin and characteristics of litigant litigation mode, taking the concept of party doctrine as the starting point of the right protection, has gradually formed the litigation pattern which is dominated by both the prosecution and the defense, and the judge is aloof and neutral. This study is divided into six parts: the introduction introduces the background and significance of the topic, and analyzes the influence of the litigation mode on the litigation structure of our country, so as to find out its drawbacks and the reform direction in the course of its development. The second part introduces the connotation and origin of litigant litigation mode. The third part further analyzes the system characteristics of litigant litigation mode. The emphasis is on the in-depth analysis of the characteristic system of litigant litigation mode. The fourth part is about the evolution and development of criminal procedure system in Anglo-American countries. Taking the development of typical silent right system and illegal evidence exclusion system in Anglo-American countries as an example, Combing the evolution of criminal procedure mode in Anglo-American countries, The fifth part is to analyze the influence of the litigation structure of Anglo-American state party doctrine on the litigation mode of our country. From the development course of litigation mode of our country and the criminal procedure law of 2012. The sixth part is to look forward to the trend of litigant litigation mode. Through the analysis of the malpractice of litigant litigation mode, First of all, it is necessary to strengthen the effectiveness of the judge's ruling in the pretrial procedure, secondly, to limit the defendant's right to silence, then to strengthen the position of the judge in the trial process, and finally, to strengthen the protection of human rights for the victims.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：暨南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D925.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 施鵬鵬;;為職權(quán)主義辯護(hù)[J];中國法學(xué);2014年02期

2 姜小川;;沉默權(quán)制度的發(fā)展、利弊與限制[J];政法論叢;2011年05期

3 丁啟明;;英國刑事訴訟中沉默權(quán)制度的發(fā)展與變遷[J];東南司法評(píng)論;2010年00期

4 顧彬;;刑事審判程序中調(diào)查證據(jù)方式之比較考察[J];四川教育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2010年07期

5 魏小偉;;當(dāng)事人主義刑事訴訟中的量刑程序評(píng)析[J];安徽警官職業(yè)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2010年03期

6 張曉華;;新當(dāng)事人主義論[J];河北法學(xué);2009年12期

7 羅祥遠(yuǎn);;論刑事庭審中的證據(jù)調(diào)查范圍[J];廣西政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2008年02期

8 饒艾,曾紅宇;當(dāng)事人主義訴訟模式與判例法[J];西南民族大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文社科版);2004年02期

9 孫長(zhǎng)永;當(dāng)事人主義刑事訴訟中的法庭調(diào)查程序評(píng)析[J];政治與法律;2003年03期

10 季金華,金成富;自治與權(quán)威:當(dāng)事人主義訴訟模式的價(jià)值機(jī)理[J];江蘇社會(huì)科學(xué);2002年02期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 肖波;刑事庭審調(diào)查制度的正當(dāng)性研究[D];復(fù)旦大學(xué);2009年

2 萬永海;刑事法庭調(diào)查論[D];中國政法大學(xué);2005年

，

本文編號(hào)：1649842