本文選題：法官庭前閱卷　切入點(diǎn)：案卷移送　出處：《西南石油大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：法官的庭前閱卷行為被認(rèn)為是預(yù)斷形成的源頭,閱卷預(yù)斷對(duì)刑事訴訟各環(huán)節(jié)特別是庭審程序的推進(jìn)和自由心證的形成都能造成較大的影響,是阻礙庭審實(shí)質(zhì)化實(shí)現(xiàn)的主要原因之一。完善法官庭前閱卷制度的主要目的,就是為了預(yù)防閱卷預(yù)斷影響到刑事案件的實(shí)體審理。在我國(guó)目前大力推進(jìn)以審判為中心的訴訟制度改革之大背景下,從法官的庭前閱卷規(guī)則入手,完善法官的庭前閱卷制度,以實(shí)現(xiàn)預(yù)斷阻卻,是訴訟制度改革的應(yīng)有之義。從廣義上來講,法官庭前閱卷分為"閱"與"卷"兩個(gè)部分,案卷的移送方式?jīng)Q定了法官庭前能閱之卷的內(nèi)容,作為閱卷行為的客體,對(duì)案卷移送制度的變化及其對(duì)法官庭前閱卷的影響是探討法官庭前閱卷制度的基礎(chǔ)。本文從我國(guó)先后三種案卷移送制度的變化入手,闡明了由案卷移送方式?jīng)Q定的案卷內(nèi)容之多寡對(duì)法官庭前閱卷的影響即對(duì)閱卷預(yù)斷形成的影響;再對(duì)域外采用不同案卷移送制度的國(guó)家在預(yù)斷阻卻方面的制度設(shè)計(jì)作了分析比較,總結(jié)出可借鑒之處;最后聯(lián)系我國(guó)目前法官庭前閱卷制度存在的問題,以閱卷預(yù)斷的阻卻為中心,借鑒外國(guó)優(yōu)秀制度設(shè)計(jì),除了對(duì)閱卷制度本身加以完善以實(shí)現(xiàn)預(yù)斷阻卻之外,還輔之以配套措施,從預(yù)斷與庭審實(shí)質(zhì)化之間對(duì)立統(tǒng)一的關(guān)系入手,以實(shí)現(xiàn)庭審的實(shí)質(zhì)化為導(dǎo)向,以消除庭前閱卷的負(fù)面效應(yīng)為目的,以切斷閱卷預(yù)斷對(duì)判決結(jié)果產(chǎn)生負(fù)面影響之路徑為手段,完善庭前閱卷制度。
[Abstract]:Judge's pre-court marking behavior is considered to be the source of the formation of prejudgment, which can have a great impact on all aspects of criminal proceedings, especially the advance of court proceedings and the formation of free psychological evidence. It is one of the main reasons that hinder the realization of the materialization of the trial. In order to prevent the prejudging of file marking from affecting the substantive trial of criminal cases. Under the background of vigorously promoting the reform of the trial centered litigation system in our country at present, starting with the judges' pre-court marking rules, we can improve the judges' pre-court marking system. It is the proper meaning of the reform of the litigation system to realize the prejudging obstruction. In a broad sense, the judge's pre-court examination is divided into two parts: "read" and "volume", and the transfer mode of the case file determines the content of the volume that the judge can read before the court. As the object of the marking behavior, the change of the case file transfer system and its influence on the judge's pre-court filing system are the basis of the discussion of the judge's pre-court filing system. This paper begins with the changes of the three kinds of case file transfer system in China. This paper expounds the influence of the content of the case file which is decided by the transfer mode of the case file on the judge's pre-court file reading, that is, the influence on the formation of the prejudgment of the case file. Then the paper analyzes and compares the system design of the countries that adopt different transfer systems of case files abroad in the aspect of prejudging obstruction, and summarizes the points that can be used for reference. Finally, the problems existing in the system of judges' pre-court marking in our country are analyzed and compared. Taking the obstruction of prejudgment as the center and drawing lessons from the design of foreign excellent systems, in addition to perfecting the marking system itself to realize the pre-judgment, it is supplemented by supporting measures, starting with the unity of opposites between the prejudgment and the materialization of the trial. In order to realize the essence of the trial as the direction, to eliminate the negative effect of the pre-court marking, to cut off the path of the pre-judgment to the result of judgment as a means, to improve the system of pre-court marking.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南石油大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D925.2

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前7條

1 劉，

本文編號(hào)：1644645