本文選題：政府信息　切入點：信息公開行為　出處：《蘭州大學》2014年碩士論文　論文類型：學位論文

【摘要】：政府信息公開訴訟對于建設透明政府、防止權(quán)利腐敗以及保障公民的知情權(quán)具有重要意義。政府信息公開訴訟作為一種新型訴訟,其在案件受理、證據(jù)規(guī)則、案件審理、司法認定等方面均與傳統(tǒng)的行政訴訟不同,具有一定的特殊性。然而,我國目前的政府信息公開訴訟制度還處于起步階段,相關(guān)的法律法規(guī)也不夠完善,進而使得政府信息公開訴訟并沒有起到對政府信息公開所應有的“倒逼”作用。為此,本文從對政府信息公開訴訟的相關(guān)理論出發(fā),對我國政府信息公開訴訟的基礎理論和現(xiàn)狀進行了梳理和分析,并結(jié)合相關(guān)典型案例,對我國政府信息公開訴訟的司法實踐進行了剖析,從政府信息公開訴訟的微觀角度提出了自己的建議。具體而言,本文分為以下幾個部分： 第一部分,為本文的第一章,從宏觀層面著手,詳細論述了“政府信息公開訴訟的一般原理”。首先,厘清了政府信息的內(nèi)涵,探討了政府信息公開的范圍及方式,分析了政府信息公開的意義。其次,研究了政府信息公開行為的可訴性,并探究了政府信息公開訴訟對于保障民眾知情權(quán)以及促進行政訴訟制度的現(xiàn)代化的基本功能。最后,討論了政府信息公開訴訟與行政復議兩種救濟模式的配置。 第二部分,為本文的第二章到第五章,從微觀角度出發(fā),分別針對政府信息公開訴訟審理過程中的受案范圍、當事人和舉證責任這三個重要方面展開了相關(guān)研究,同時對司法認定這一重要內(nèi)容進行了探討。首先,分析了我國政府信息公開訴訟中受案范圍過于狹窄的原因,并就擴大受案范圍的難點進行了深入研究并提出了相應的完善措施。其次,針對政府信息公開訴訟中當事人資格認定難的問題,剖析了我國在原告和被告資格認定方面存在的瑕疵,并在此基礎上對“擴大原告范圍”以及“被告資格認定中的難點”提出了相關(guān)建議。再次,研究了雙方當事人舉證責任分配的特殊規(guī)則,并對被告舉證責任和原告舉證責任分別進行了優(yōu)化。最后,針對我國目前缺乏對例外信息的具體認定方法的現(xiàn)狀,詳細論述了例外信息的認定方法,并從微觀層面上討論了例外信息的具體認定。
[Abstract]:The public litigation of government information is of great significance to the construction of transparent government, the prevention of corruption of rights and the protection of citizens' right to know. As a new type of litigation, the public litigation of government information is accepted in cases, rules of evidence, and cases are tried. Judicial determination is different from the traditional administrative litigation, and has some particularity. However, the current litigation system of government information disclosure in our country is still in its infancy, and the relevant laws and regulations are not perfect enough. Thus, the government information disclosure litigation does not play the role of "overturning" the government information disclosure. Therefore, this paper proceeds from the relevant theory of the government information disclosure litigation. This paper analyzes the basic theory and present situation of the public litigation of government information in China, and analyzes the judicial practice of the public litigation of government information in our country in the light of the relevant typical cases. From the micro point of view of government information disclosure litigation, this paper puts forward its own suggestions. Specifically, this paper is divided into the following parts:. The first part, as the first chapter of this paper, discusses in detail the "general principle of government information disclosure litigation" from the macro level. Firstly, it clarifies the connotation of government information, and probes into the scope and method of government information disclosure. This paper analyzes the significance of government information disclosure. Secondly, it studies the actionable nature of government information disclosure, and probes into the basic function of government information disclosure litigation to protect the public's right to know and to promote the modernization of administrative litigation system. This paper discusses the allocation of two relief modes: government information publicity litigation and administrative reconsideration. The second part, from the second chapter to the 5th chapter, from the microscopic point of view, from the perspective of the public government information litigation process in the case of the scope of the case, the parties and the burden of proof of these three important aspects of the relevant research. At the same time, it discusses the important content of judicial cognizance. Firstly, it analyzes the reasons for the narrow scope of the cases in the public information litigation of our government. It also makes a thorough study on the difficulties of expanding the scope of accepting cases and puts forward the corresponding improvement measures. Secondly, aiming at the difficulty of determining the qualification of the parties in the public government information litigation, This paper analyzes the defects in the qualification of the plaintiff and the defendant in China, and on this basis puts forward some relevant suggestions on "enlarging the scope of the plaintiff" and "the difficulty in the determination of the defendant's qualification". This paper studies the special rules of the distribution of the burden of proof of both parties, and optimizes the burden of proof of the defendant and the plaintiff respectively. The identification method of exception information is discussed in detail, and the concrete identification of exception information is discussed from micro level.
【學位授予單位】：蘭州大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D925.3

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 林鴻潮;許蓮麗;;論政府信息公開訴訟中的證明責任[J];證據(jù)科學;2009年01期

2 趙正群;宮雁;;美國的信息公開訴訟制度及其對我國的啟示[J];法學評論;2009年01期

3 黃學賢;梁s，

本文編號：1574667