本文選題：民事訴訟　切入點(diǎn)：非訟案件　出處：《海南大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：在大陸法系民事訴訟程序制度中,根據(jù)案件本質(zhì)、特點(diǎn)的不同,把案件分為訴訟案件和非訟案件,以訴訟案件和非訟案件為對(duì)象就有了相應(yīng)的不同的審理程序。在我國(guó)現(xiàn)行《民事訴訟法》中沒(méi)有區(qū)分訴訟案件與非訟案件,也沒(méi)有以非訟案件為對(duì)象的民事非訟程序概念。但是,我國(guó)《民事訴訟法》中規(guī)定的特別程序的審理對(duì)象實(shí)質(zhì)上已經(jīng)具備了非訟案件的本質(zhì),特別程序也就是實(shí)質(zhì)意義上的民事非訟程序。目前已有一些學(xué)者對(duì)民事非訟程序有一定的研究,但是對(duì)民事非訟程序在民事司法領(lǐng)域中的角色和地位以及對(duì)民事非訟程序相關(guān)程序規(guī)則的立法的完善還是有所欠缺。文章從民事非訟程序的審理對(duì)象非訟案件切入,概述了民事非訟程序的基本理論。在深入探討了非訟案件的本質(zhì)和特征的基礎(chǔ)上,闡述了民事非訟程序與訴訟程序、特別程序及非訴訟程序的區(qū)別。為了對(duì)民事非訟程序有更全面、客觀的理解,考察了德國(guó)、日本、法國(guó)和俄國(guó)四國(guó)的民事非訟程序,通過(guò)考察得到了應(yīng)當(dāng)要完善我國(guó)民事非訟程序的程序規(guī)則、擴(kuò)展我國(guó)民事非訟程序的調(diào)整范圍、運(yùn)用多元程序體現(xiàn)不同的程序價(jià)值以及保持我國(guó)民事非訟程序的開(kāi)放性這幾點(diǎn)啟示。在通過(guò)對(duì)我國(guó)民事非訟程序現(xiàn)狀的分析中總結(jié)出我國(guó)民事非訟程序存在著價(jià)值定位不明確、立法規(guī)定不科學(xué)、適用范圍較狹窄、救濟(jì)途徑不完善等問(wèn)題。依據(jù)對(duì)我國(guó)民事非訟程序存在問(wèn)題的原因的分析,建議要明確我國(guó)民事非訟程序的地位和價(jià)值,完善我國(guó)民事非訟程序的立法規(guī)定,強(qiáng)化我國(guó)民事非訟程序的功能,健全我國(guó)民事非訟程序向訴訟程序轉(zhuǎn)換的機(jī)制,完善我國(guó)民事非訟程序的救濟(jì)途徑。
[Abstract]:In the civil procedure system of civil law system, cases are divided into litigation cases and non-litigation cases according to the nature and characteristics of the cases. Taking litigation cases and non-litigation cases as the objects, there are corresponding different trial procedures. There is no distinction between litigation cases and non-litigation cases in the current Civil procedure Law of China. There is also no concept of civil non-litigation procedure for non-contentious cases. However, the object of special procedures stipulated in our country's Civil procedure Law has in essence possessed the essence of non-contentious cases. The special procedure is also the civil non-litigation procedure in the essence. At present, some scholars have studied the civil non-litigation procedure to a certain extent. However, the role and status of civil non-litigation proceedings in the field of civil justice and the perfection of the relevant procedural rules of civil non-litigation proceedings are still lacking. This paper summarizes the basic theory of civil non-contentious procedure, and on the basis of deeply discussing the essence and characteristics of non-contentious case, expounds the civil non-contentious procedure and litigation procedure. In order to have a more comprehensive and objective understanding of civil non-litigation proceedings, we examined civil non-litigation proceedings in Germany, Japan, France and Russia. Through investigation, we have obtained that we should perfect the procedural rules of civil non-litigation proceedings in our country, and expand the adjustment scope of civil non-litigation proceedings in our country. By using multiple procedures to reflect different procedural values and to maintain the openness of civil non-litigation proceedings in China, the author concludes that the value orientation of civil non-litigation proceedings in China is not clear through the analysis of the present situation of civil non-litigation proceedings in China. The legislative provisions are not scientific, the scope of application is relatively narrow, the remedy channel is not perfect and so on. Based on the analysis of the causes of the problems existing in the civil non-litigation procedure in China, it is suggested that the status and value of the civil non-litigation procedure in our country should be clarified. The legislative provisions of civil non-litigation procedure in China should be perfected, the function of civil non-litigation procedure should be strengthened, the mechanism of transforming civil non-litigation procedure into litigation procedure should be perfected, and the relief ways of civil non-litigation procedure in China should be perfected.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：海南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D925.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 姜巧靈;;非訟程序的缺陷及其完善[J];白城師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2012年02期

2 章武生,楊嚴(yán)炎;德國(guó)民事訴訟制度改革之評(píng)析[J];比較法研究;2003年01期

3 王祥遠(yuǎn);;非訟程序芻議[J];長(zhǎng)沙大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2008年01期

4 鄒軍;;論我國(guó)民事非訟程序的調(diào)整范圍[J];東南大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2009年S1期

5 章武生;;論我國(guó)大調(diào)解機(jī)制的構(gòu)建——兼析大調(diào)解與ADR的關(guān)系[J];法商研究;2007年06期

6 郝振江;;論非訟程序在我國(guó)的重構(gòu)[J];法學(xué)家;2011年04期

7 湯維建;王鴻雁;;我國(guó)非訟程序的立法問(wèn)題及解決建議[J];廣東行政學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2008年01期

8 孫永軍;;訴訟事件非訟化:含義、法理基礎(chǔ)與界限[J];甘肅政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2009年03期

9 趙蕾;;訴訟與非訟的再區(qū)分——以訴訟與非訟基本模式的差異為研究進(jìn)路[J];比較法研究;2012年04期

10 陳桂明;趙蕾;;比較與分析:我國(guó)非訟程序構(gòu)架過(guò)程中的基本問(wèn)題[J];河北法學(xué);2010年07期

，

本文編號(hào)：1574559