本文選題：附條件不起訴　切入點(diǎn)：程序　出處：《華南理工大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文　論文類(lèi)型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：附條件不起訴制度于90年代初引入我國(guó)，最初運(yùn)用于基層檢察院的司法實(shí)驗(yàn)，經(jīng)過(guò)二十余年的發(fā)展，在新刑訴法中得以確立。該制度的建立，旨在以非刑罰化的方式，教育、感化失足未成年人順利重歸社會(huì)。然而，制度價(jià)值能否在運(yùn)行中得以實(shí)現(xiàn)，很大程度上取決于程序的設(shè)計(jì)：程序規(guī)定越詳盡、合理，，運(yùn)行阻力越小。障于我國(guó)法律規(guī)定仍比較粗疏，附條件不起訴程序規(guī)定不夠周密，在實(shí)踐中呈現(xiàn)出各級(jí)基層檢察院操作不規(guī)范，不統(tǒng)一等問(wèn)題，亟待進(jìn)一步完善。 本文從程序角度入手，將附條件不起訴分為啟動(dòng)和決定程序、考察和決定程序及監(jiān)督和救濟(jì)程序三個(gè)部分。啟動(dòng)和決定程序中，筆者提出增加啟動(dòng)的申請(qǐng)方式、在審查中引入社會(huì)調(diào)查方式、附條件不起訴決定前確立聽(tīng)證程序并對(duì)審查內(nèi)容、決定的作出過(guò)程作出詳細(xì)的程序設(shè)計(jì)。在考察和決定程序中，改進(jìn)了聯(lián)合考察委員會(huì)考察模式、并針對(duì)考驗(yàn)期限及考察內(nèi)容作出詳細(xì)規(guī)定。在監(jiān)督和救濟(jì)程序中：一方面，通過(guò)提出完善人民監(jiān)督員監(jiān)督程序及建立人民代表委員會(huì)監(jiān)督程序來(lái)補(bǔ)充附條件不起訴程序的外部監(jiān)督；另一方面，對(duì)被害人及犯罪嫌疑人救濟(jì)程序存在的問(wèn)題提出建議。
[Abstract]:The conditional non prosecution system in China at the beginning of 90s, initially used in judicial experiment of grass-roots procuratorates, after twenty years of development, has been established in the new criminal procedure law. The establishment of the system, aimed at the non penalty, probation education, juvenile delinquents successfully return to the society. However, whether the system value can be achieved in the operation, the design for the procedure depends largely on the procedures: more detailed, reasonable, running resistance is small. The barrier in the laws and regulations of our country is still relatively crude, the provisions of conditional non prosecution procedure is not thorough, in practice, showing the operation of grass-roots procuratorates at all levels are not standardized, the problem is not uniform. Needs to be further improved.
This article from the perspective of the program, the conditional non prosecution is divided up and decision procedures, three part of the investigation and decision procedures and supervision and relief procedures. And decided to start the program, the author proposes to increase the start mode of application, the introduction of social survey methods in the review of a decision not to prosecute, before the establishment of the hearing procedures and to review the content, make the decision making process of program design in detail. In the investigation and decision procedures, improved joint investigation committee inspection mode, and make detailed provisions for the probation period and investigation contents. In the supervision and relief program: on the one hand, through the external supervision and improve the people's supervisor supervision procedures and the establishment of the people's representative the Committee supervision procedures to supplement the conditional non prosecution procedure; on the other hand, put forward suggestions on the process problems of criminal suspects and the victim relief.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：華南理工大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D925.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 何挺;謝芳胤;;臺(tái)灣緩起訴制度介評(píng)[J];研究生法學(xué);2005年03期

2 汪建成;;論未成年人犯罪訴訟程序的建立和完善[J];法學(xué);2012年01期

3 刁飛騰;;未成年人附條件不起訴適用條件與程序分析[J];法制與社會(huì);2013年35期

4 劉浪;景孝杰;;附條件不起訴制度的構(gòu)建[J];華東政法大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2010年05期

5 王崇蓉;蘇恩濤;;我國(guó)未成年人附條件不起訴制度探究[J];湖北成人教育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2012年05期

6 韓成軍;;新《刑事訴訟法》對(duì)附條件不起訴制度的完善[J];河南社會(huì)科學(xué);2012年10期

7 高維儉;;少年司法之社會(huì)人格調(diào)查報(bào)告制度論要[J];環(huán)球法律評(píng)論;2010年03期

8 曾友祥;;建立我國(guó)犯罪被害補(bǔ)償制度[J];現(xiàn)代法學(xué);1990年06期

9 劉學(xué)敏;;論緩起訴的法理基礎(chǔ)及制度建構(gòu)——從刑事追訴理念的轉(zhuǎn)變談起[J];廈門(mén)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2007年01期

10 宋英輝,吳宏耀;不起訴裁量權(quán)研究[J];政法論壇;2000年05期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 馬健;附條件不起訴制度研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2013年

本文編號(hào)：1566296