本文選題：刑事訴訟　切入點(diǎn)：過程證據(jù)　出處：《揚(yáng)州大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：過程證據(jù)是證明案件過程事實(shí)的材料,實(shí)質(zhì)上是一種司法過程的行為記錄,貫穿偵查、強(qiáng)制措施、審查起訴甚至法庭審理等司法行為的各個(gè)階段,其作用重點(diǎn)就在于防止超期羈押,刑訊逼供,保障司法正義;同時(shí)過程證據(jù)作為一種形式上的程序性監(jiān)督為程序性辯護(hù)提供了對(duì)應(yīng)依據(jù),特別是在現(xiàn)有條件下,通過過程證據(jù)的作用來彌補(bǔ)刑事訴訟中程序性裁判機(jī)制尚未有效形成、刑訴中的程序性保障不健全等理念與機(jī)制的欠缺具有一定的積極意義,但過程證據(jù)也具有其不足,為更好的發(fā)揮對(duì)程序性辯護(hù)的作用,需要予以完善。本文正文除緒論外共包括五個(gè)部分,分別是問題的提出和過程證據(jù)的界定、過程證據(jù)適用現(xiàn)狀分析、域外過程證據(jù)的適用、過程證據(jù)作用的完善、對(duì)問題的回應(yīng)以及總結(jié)。第一部分:問題的提出和過程證據(jù)的概說。這一部分首先通過介紹年度比較受關(guān)注的“雷洋案”來提出問題,然后通過問題引出過程證據(jù)的概說也就是其概念及其分類、特征,明確文章研究的對(duì)象為過程證據(jù)的適用;然后通過問題來引出過程證據(jù)在實(shí)踐中需要解決什么;最后從程序、理念等方向說明過程證據(jù)需要完善的方向。第二部分:過程證據(jù)適用現(xiàn)狀分析。這一部分首先介紹了過程證據(jù)的適用,也就是介紹了過程證據(jù)對(duì)刑事訴訟的作用;其次從過程證據(jù)適用不足以及問題來說明過程證據(jù)適用需要完善的必要性。第三部分:域外過程證據(jù)適用的程序性保障。這一部分從國外證據(jù)的相關(guān)法律制度入手,分別從英美法系和大陸法系兩個(gè)方面,對(duì)美國、英國、德國、法國等國家在“過程證據(jù)”方面所做的規(guī)定進(jìn)行梳理,并初步總結(jié),從中得出我國過程證據(jù)適用完善路勁的啟示。第四部分:過程證據(jù)適用用的完善。綜合我國過程證據(jù)在刑事訴訟中適用的現(xiàn)狀、存在的問題以及國外相關(guān)制度對(duì)我國的啟示,分別從理念、程序以及配套制度等對(duì)我國刑事訴訟中過程證據(jù)適用完善路徑提出建議。第五部分:對(duì)問題的回應(yīng)以及總結(jié)。這一部分主要是對(duì)前文的總結(jié),首先通過對(duì)開篇問題的回應(yīng)從而引出過程證據(jù)完善路徑具有的可行性建議進(jìn)行總結(jié),最后對(duì)制度進(jìn)行展望。
[Abstract]:Process evidence is the material to prove the facts of the case process. In essence, it is a kind of judicial process behavior record. It runs through various stages of judicial acts, such as investigation, coercive measures, examination of prosecution and even trial by the court. Its role is to prevent prolonged detention, extort confessions by torture and guarantee judicial justice. Meanwhile, process evidence, as a formal procedural supervision, provides a corresponding basis for procedural defense, especially under existing conditions. Through the role of process evidence to make up for the criminal proceedings in the procedural adjudication mechanism has not been effectively formed, procedural protection in criminal proceedings is not perfect and lack of ideas and mechanisms have a certain positive significance, but process evidence also has its shortcomings. In order to play a better role in procedural defense, it needs to be perfected. Besides the introduction, the text of this paper consists of five parts, namely, the raising of the question and the definition of the process evidence, the analysis of the current situation of the application of the process evidence, and the application of the extraterritorial process evidence. Improvement of the role of process evidence, response to and summary of problems. Part I: introduction of questions and process evidence. This part first raises questions by introducing the "Lei Yang case", which has attracted more attention in the year. Then, it introduces the concept and classification of the process evidence through the problem, and defines the object of the article as the application of the process evidence. Then, it leads to what the process evidence needs to be solved in practice by the question. Finally, from the procedure, The second part: analysis of the application of process evidence. This part first introduces the application of process evidence, that is, the role of process evidence in criminal proceedings; Secondly, it explains the necessity of perfecting the application of process evidence from the point of insufficient application of process evidence and the problem. The third part: procedural guarantee of the application of extraterritorial process evidence. This part starts with the relevant legal system of foreign evidence. Respectively from the Anglo-American law system and the civil law system, the United States, the United Kingdom, Germany, France and other countries in the "process evidence" aspects of the comb, and preliminary summary, Part 4th: the perfection of the application of process evidence. It synthesizes the current situation of the application of Chinese process evidence in criminal proceedings, the existing problems and the enlightenment of foreign related systems to our country. Respectively from the concept, procedure and supporting system to the criminal procedure in our country to apply the perfect path of the process evidence put forward suggestions. 5th part: response to the problem and summary. This part is the summary of the previous article, First, through the response to the opening question, the feasibility suggestions of the process evidence perfect path are summarized, and finally, the system is prospected.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：揚(yáng)州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D925.2

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 崔巍嵐,王有才;追查證據(jù)“保管鏈”質(zhì)疑證據(jù)之效力[J];河北法學(xué);2000年05期

2 馬德鴻;略論法官庭外證據(jù)調(diào)查權(quán)[J];甘肅政法成人教育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2001年03期

3 裴國智;試析法學(xué)證據(jù)[J];武漢公安干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2005年03期

4 王晶,張弘;從功能視角看證據(jù)的屬性[J];人民檢察;2005年21期

5 孫曉紅;;對(duì)證據(jù)調(diào)查變革的認(rèn)識(shí)[J];河南公安高等專科學(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);2007年04期

6 李長城;;論刑事二審的證據(jù)調(diào)查[J];法學(xué)論壇;2011年04期

7 黃園;;對(duì)證據(jù)概念及特征的再認(rèn)識(shí)[J];商業(yè)文化(下半月);2011年12期

8 何家弘;;關(guān)于創(chuàng)建“證據(jù)調(diào)查學(xué)”的構(gòu)想[J];法學(xué)家;1996年06期

9 何家弘;證據(jù)調(diào)查方法探源(續(xù))[J];中央檢察官管理學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);1997年02期

10 王若陽;析證據(jù)調(diào)查中常見的錯(cuò)誤[J];北京警院學(xué)報(bào);1997年01期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前10條

1 姚勇;建立證據(jù)調(diào)查令制度初探[N];江蘇經(jīng)濟(jì)報(bào);2003年

2 程雷;用制度保障采納無罪與罪輕證據(jù)[N];法制日?qǐng)?bào);2005年

3 山東省聊城市中級(jí)人民法院 鄭萬宏　李玉萍 關(guān)淼;專門調(diào)查體現(xiàn)審判職責(zé)[N];人民法院報(bào);2009年

4 中國青年政治學(xué)院法律系副主任 孫遠(yuǎn);從薄熙來案看證據(jù)問題[N];檢察日?qǐng)?bào);2013年

5 張吉喜;德國刑事訴訟中的證據(jù)禁止[N];人民法院報(bào);2005年

6 陳建平;安寧人依靠證據(jù)“打官司”[N];云南日?qǐng)?bào);2003年

7 齊樹潔;證據(jù)制度的改革任重而道遠(yuǎn)[N];人民法院報(bào);2003年

8 鄭萬宏　李玉萍 關(guān)淼;從司法鑒定到證據(jù)調(diào)查[N];人民法院報(bào);2009年

9 武漢大學(xué)法學(xué)院教授、博士生導(dǎo)師 江國華;通過證據(jù)法則的司法人權(quán)保障[N];人民法院報(bào);2011年

10 崔欣;我國民事訴訟中建立調(diào)查令制度之設(shè)想[N];江蘇法制報(bào);2006年

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前4條

1 康丹;南海島礁主權(quán)歸屬證據(jù)研究初論[D];武漢大學(xué);2013年

2 陳驚天;法官證據(jù)評(píng)判研究[D];中國政法大學(xué);2009年

3 孫義剛;證據(jù)契約研究[D];重慶大學(xué);2008年

4 金玄默;論證據(jù)裁判主義[D];中國政法大學(xué);2008年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 黃穎婷;論刑事訴訟中的“情況說明”[D];西南大學(xué);2015年

2 王巖;論啟動(dòng)刑事再審之新證據(jù)[D];中國青年政治學(xué)院;2014年

3 陳i吪，

本文編號(hào)：1566847