本文關(guān)鍵詞： 彭宇案 法院 司法公開制度 交互性司法公開模式 信息發(fā)布機(jī)制 輿論回應(yīng)機(jī)制　出處：《哈爾濱工業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版)》2017年01期 　論文類型：期刊論文

【摘要】：法院司法公開制度建設(shè)所取得的成績(jī)令人鼓舞,但在實(shí)踐中仍然有值得深入研究的問題,其中突出的是司法公開制度建設(shè)上仍然存在的封閉性、單向性等現(xiàn)象,使得在現(xiàn)實(shí)司法實(shí)踐過程中,所謂司法公開制度卻不能有效構(gòu)建起對(duì)外部信息或輿論的回應(yīng),這直接影響了民眾對(duì)司法公信力的期盼。運(yùn)用法律社會(huì)學(xué)方法,以具有典型意義的彭宇案為切入點(diǎn)進(jìn)行分析研究,展現(xiàn)了彭宇案中當(dāng)事人、媒體和公眾以及法院的行動(dòng)特征。法院判決沒有錯(cuò)誤,但在媒體的持續(xù)發(fā)酵中卻不作回應(yīng),這與法院司法公開制度不完善密切相關(guān)。應(yīng)建立法院與媒體合理對(duì)話的司法公開機(jī)制,加強(qiáng)司法公開機(jī)制的法治保障,構(gòu)建包含信息發(fā)布機(jī)制和輿論回應(yīng)機(jī)制等內(nèi)容的交互性模式的制度系統(tǒng),以完善法院司法公開制度。
[Abstract]:The achievements in the construction of the judicial disclosure system of the court are encouraging, but in practice there are still problems worthy of further study, among which, there are still closed and unidirectional phenomena in the construction of the judicial disclosure system. In the process of judicial practice, the so-called judicial disclosure system can not effectively construct the response to the external information or public opinion, which directly affects the public's expectation of judicial credibility. With the typical meaning of Peng Yu case as the breakthrough point of analysis and research, it shows the action characteristics of the parties, the media and the public, as well as the court. The court judgment is not wrong. However, there is no response in the continuous fermentation of the media, which is closely related to the imperfection of the judicial disclosure system of the court. We should establish the judicial openness mechanism of reasonable dialogue between the court and the media, and strengthen the rule of law protection of the judicial disclosure mechanism. In order to perfect the system of judicial openness of the court, an interactive system including the mechanism of information release and the mechanism of public opinion response is constructed.
【作者單位】： 華東理工大學(xué)法學(xué)院;
【基金】：中國(guó)法學(xué)會(huì)(部級(jí))2013年重大研究項(xiàng)目“法律實(shí)施的保障機(jī)制研究”(CLS2013A04) 2016年中央高校基本科研業(yè)務(wù)費(fèi)專項(xiàng)資金資助項(xiàng)目“法律制度實(shí)施效果評(píng)估體系研究”(WT1621001)
【分類號(hào)】：D926.1
【正文快照】： 一、彭宇案與司法公開制度建設(shè)法院司法公開制度建設(shè)所取得的成績(jī)令人鼓舞,但在實(shí)踐中仍然有值得深入研究的問題。就學(xué)術(shù)界、實(shí)務(wù)界而言,在法院司法公開制度研究上,關(guān)注較多的如司法公開的價(jià)值、意義和功能的問題,中國(guó)司法公開制度的歷史演進(jìn)問題,域外司法公開制度建設(shè)的借鑒

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前8條

1 曾令健;;法院如何面對(duì)傳媒:一個(gè)文本的分析[J];前沿;2010年15期

2 林愛s，

本文編號(hào)：1490175