本文關(guān)鍵詞： 證人出庭作證 直接言詞原則 以審判為中心訴訟制度　出處：《煙臺大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：以審判為中心的訴訟制度改革要求必須“確保偵查、起訴的案件事實(shí)證據(jù)經(jīng)得起法律的檢驗(yàn)。全面貫徹證據(jù)裁判規(guī)則,嚴(yán)格依法收集、固定、保存、審查、運(yùn)用證據(jù),完善證人、鑒定人出庭制度,保證庭審在查明事實(shí)、認(rèn)定證據(jù)、保護(hù)訴權(quán)、公正裁判中發(fā)揮決定性作用”�，F(xiàn)代刑事訴訟法要求法官必須直接面對證據(jù)、接觸證據(jù),親自調(diào)查和采納證據(jù)。按照這一要求,證人必須出庭作證。然而在我國司法實(shí)踐的過程中,證人出庭作證問題一直是制約庭審實(shí)質(zhì)化的頑疾�；诖�,本文選意義了我國刑事證人出庭制度為研究對象。其中,證人出庭作證的現(xiàn)實(shí)意義和我國當(dāng)前出庭作證制度存在的缺陷即是選題初衷,也是是研究要點(diǎn);在此基礎(chǔ)上從制度、觀念、執(zhí)法三個層面論述了該缺陷存在的成因,并引用了五個真實(shí)典型的案例予以進(jìn)一步闡述,此為論文的論述重點(diǎn);在客觀分析成因、借鑒國外先進(jìn)經(jīng)驗(yàn)做法的基礎(chǔ)上,嘗試創(chuàng)造性的提出了該制度的完善措施:即完善證人出庭保障機(jī)制、排除特殊情況及加大懲戒力度,從而力圖轉(zhuǎn)變目前我國刑事證人不愿作證的現(xiàn)實(shí)窘境,進(jìn)一步推動刑事證人作證制度的完善與發(fā)展。
[Abstract]:The reform of litigation system with trial as the center must "ensure that the factual evidence of investigation and prosecution cases can withstand the examination of law, fully implement the rules of evidence adjudication, collect, fix, preserve and examine strictly according to law." Using evidence to perfect the system of witnesses and experts in court, to ensure that the trial is to find out the facts, identify the evidence, and protect the right of action. A decisive role in impartial adjudication "... modern criminal procedure law requires judges to face evidence directly, to come into contact with evidence, to investigate and accept evidence in person... in accordance with this requirement." Witnesses must testify in court. However, in the process of judicial practice in our country, the problem of witnesses appearing in court to testify has always been a stubborn disease that restricts the materialization of the trial. This article chooses the criminal witness appearing in court system of our country as the research object. Among them, the realistic significance of the witness appearing in court and the defect of the present system of appearing in court in our country are not only the original intention of selecting the topic, but also the main point of the research; On this basis, from the system, concept, law enforcement three levels discussed the causes of the defect, and cited five real and typical cases to be further elaborated, this is the focus of the paper; On the basis of objective analysis of the cause of formation and drawing lessons from foreign advanced experiences and practices, this paper tries to creatively put forward the perfect measures of this system: perfecting the witness appearance guarantee mechanism, excluding the special circumstances and increasing the disciplinary force. In order to change the current situation of our criminal witnesses unwilling to testify, and further promote the perfection and development of criminal witness testifying system.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：煙臺大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D925.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 史立梅;;我國刑事證人出庭作證制度的改革及其評價[J];山東社會科學(xué);2013年04期

，

本文編號：1485806