本文關鍵詞： 審前羈押 程序正義 權利保障　出處：《華中師范大學》2016年碩士論文　論文類型：學位論文

【摘要】：羈押是對犯罪嫌疑人、被告人人身自由的剝奪,是一項最為嚴厲的刑事強制措施。為了防止羈押錯誤,保障公民的人身自由,現(xiàn)代法治國家普遍建立了嚴格的審前羈押審查程序,由中立的法官在控辯雙方的參加下,采用訴訟的形式,對是否予以羈押進行審查并作出決定。我國2012年修訂的刑事訴訟法完善了人民檢察院審查批準逮捕的程序,理論上賦予了犯罪嫌疑人及其辯護律師對逮捕的異議權。但是,這種審查程序不是偵查機關與犯罪嫌疑人同時在場的情況下進行的,仍然是一種“行政審批式”審查程序,缺乏訴訟式審查程序的對抗性,很難從根本上防止錯誤逮捕導致的非法羈押,最終侵害公民的人身自由。為適應依法治國,建設社會主義法治國家的需要,實現(xiàn)刑事司法法治化,防止錯誤羈押,實現(xiàn)刑事司法公正,保障公民的基本權利,必須從立法上完善我國的審前羈押審查程序。本文在闡釋審前羈押審查程序的理論基礎,借鑒西方國家審前羈押審查程序的立法經驗,剖析我國審前羈押審查程序存在的主要問題,在此基礎上,提出完善我國審前羈押審查程序的立法建議。本文共有四個部分：第一部分：闡釋羈押、審前羈押、審前羈押審查程序的含義及性質,從權力制約,權利保障和程序正義三個向度闡釋審前羈押審查程序的理論基礎。第二部分：主要介紹英國、美國、法國、德國等兩大法系主要國家的審前羈押審查程序,從審前羈押審查程序的審查主體、審查實質條件、審查方式以及審前羈押的救濟途徑等方面分析其異同,指出域外經驗對于完善我國審前羈押審查程序的借鑒意義。第三部分：介紹我國審前羈押審查程序的立法現(xiàn)狀,指出審前羈押審查程序存在的主要問題。第四部分：從構建審前羈押司法審查程序,確立審前羈押聽證式審查方式,完善審前羈押的審查內容,明確審前羈押中的證明標準,建立審前羈押救濟機制五個方面,提出完善我國審前羈押審查程序的立法建議。
[Abstract]:The detention of criminal suspects, deprived of the freedom of the accused, is one of the most severe criminal coercive measures. In order to prevent wrong detention, guarantee the personal freedom of citizens, modern countries have established a strict pre-trial detention review procedures, by the neutral judge in both sides, the lawsuit the form, to examine whether custody and make a decision. The criminal procedure law revised in 2012 to improve the people's Procuratorate for examination and approval of arrest procedures, the theory gives the criminal suspect and the lawyer the right to dissent the arrest. However, such a review procedure is not the investigation organ and the criminal suspect and the presence of the is a kind of administrative examination and approval "review procedures, the lack of litigation type examination procedures, illegal detention is difficult to fundamentally prevent false arrest to the end Infringe the personal freedom of citizens. In order to adapt to the rule of law and building a socialist country ruled by law, the criminal judicial rule of law, to prevent errors in custody to realize judicial justice, protect the basic rights of citizens, we must perfect the legislation of the pretrial detention review process. In this paper the basic theory in the interpretation of the pretrial detention review process the legislative experience from the western countries detention review procedures before trial, analyzes major problems of China's pretrial detention review procedures exist, on this basis, put forward legislative proposals to improve detention review process of China's pretrial. This paper consists of four parts: the first part: the interpretation of custody, pretrial detention, meaning and nature pretrial detention review process, from the power restriction, the protection of the rights and procedural justice three aspects of interpretation of the pretrial detention review procedures of the theoretical basis. The second part: mainly introduces the British, American, law In countries such as Germany, mainly of the two legal systems of pretrial detention review procedures, detention review process from pre-trial review subject, review of the substantive conditions, analyze the similarities and review of pretrial detention on relief way, pointed out that the extraterritorial experience for perfecting the pretrial detention review procedures for reference. The third part: the pretrial detention review procedures of the legislative situation, points out the main problems of pretrial detention review procedures exist. The fourth part: from the construction of judicial review procedure of custody before trial, establish pre-trial detention hearing type examination way, improve the review content of pretrial detention, clear proof standard of detention, the establishment of pretrial the custody relief mechanism in five aspects, put forward legislative proposals to improve China's detention review process before the trial.

【學位授予單位】：華中師范大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2016
【分類號】：D925.2

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前1條

1 陳衛(wèi)東,陸而啟;羈押啟動權與決定權配置的比較分析[J];法學;2004年11期

相關博士學位論文 前2條

1 于平;羈押審查程序要素論[D];吉林大學;2010年

2 江涌;未決羈押制度研究[D];復旦大學;2009年

，

本文編號：1473269