本文關(guān)鍵詞： 律師 會見權(quán) 偵查階段 刑事訴訟　出處：《西南政法大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：在刑事訴訟中，由于多方面的原因，犯罪嫌疑人的合法權(quán)益往往得不到很好的保障，尤其是在偵查階段，因此，這就需要各方采取措施給予有效保障。律師在偵查階段行使會見權(quán)對于犯罪嫌疑人來說就是一項非常有效的權(quán)益保障措施，它可以為犯罪嫌疑人提供多方面的幫助。律師在此階段介入，可以了解犯罪嫌疑人涉嫌的罪名和案件有關(guān)情況，聽取犯罪嫌疑人對指控罪名的意見和辯解理由等等，從而可以更好地為其提供法律幫助。另外，辯護(hù)律師在此階段介入行使會見權(quán)，對制約偵查權(quán)，保障犯罪嫌疑人的合法權(quán)益，，保障律師辯護(hù)職能的正常行使，實現(xiàn)刑事訴訟的目的起著非常重要的作用。 2012年3月通過了新修訂的《刑事訴訟法》，就律師在偵查階段行使辯護(hù)權(quán)的相關(guān)事項做了修改規(guī)定，尤其是對律師會見權(quán)的強(qiáng)化，成為這次修改的突出亮點之一。但是我們發(fā)現(xiàn)在這次新修改的刑事訴訟法中仍然存在著一些不足之處，且實踐與理論出現(xiàn)脫節(jié)現(xiàn)象。在司法實踐中，律師在偵查階段及時、順利地行使會見權(quán)仍然比較困難。 本文以J市的情況為例，對律師在偵查階段行使會見權(quán)進(jìn)行論述，正文共分三個部分。 第一部分主要介紹了新刑訴法頒布實施以來，J市律師在偵查階段行使會見權(quán)的總體狀況，了解實踐當(dāng)中律師行使訴訟權(quán)利的具體情況，有哪些特點。 第二部分主要是論述在實踐當(dāng)中，律師在偵查階段行使會見權(quán)時存在的一些問題，主要包括不能及時會見到犯罪嫌疑人、會見的時間和次數(shù)受限、與偵查人員溝通不順暢等等，進(jìn)而分析出現(xiàn)這些問題的原因，包括主觀和客觀兩個方面，為下一步完善相關(guān)法規(guī)制度做準(zhǔn)備。 第三部分主要是提出對偵查階段律師行使會見權(quán)的進(jìn)一步完善。主要包括立法上的完善和制度上的完善，立法上的完善包括明確犯罪嫌疑人的會見權(quán)、確立律師在場權(quán)、完善律師會見權(quán)救濟(jì)制度；制度上的完善包括改革羈押監(jiān)管體制、建立司法審查制度，完善獎懲、考核制度。另外，還要轉(zhuǎn)變辦案人員觀念，提升辦案人員和律師素質(zhì)。
[Abstract]:In criminal proceedings, due to various reasons, the legitimate rights and interests of criminal suspects are often not well protected, especially in the investigation stage, so. This requires all parties to take measures to give effective protection. Lawyers in the investigation phase of the exercise of the right to meet with the suspect is a very effective protection of rights and interests. It can provide a variety of help for suspects. Lawyers in this stage of intervention, can understand the suspects suspected of the charges and cases related to the situation. Listen to the suspect's opinions and justifications of the charges, and so on, so as to better provide them with legal assistance. In addition, the defense lawyer in this stage to exercise the right to meet, to restrict the power of investigation. It plays an important role to protect the legal rights and interests of criminal suspects, to ensure the normal exercise of lawyers' defense function and to achieve the purpose of criminal proceedings. In March 2012, the newly revised Code of Criminal procedure was adopted, and the relevant provisions on the exercise of the right of defense by lawyers in the investigation stage were amended, especially the strengthening of the right of lawyers to meet with each other. Become one of the outstanding highlights of this revision. But we find that there are still some deficiencies in the new revised Criminal procedure Law, and the practice and theory appear disjointed phenomenon. In judicial practice. Lawyers in the investigation stage timely, the smooth exercise of the right to meet is still relatively difficult. Taking the case of J city as an example, this paper discusses the lawyer's right to interview in the investigation stage. The text is divided into three parts. The first part mainly introduces the general situation of lawyers' right of meeting in the investigation stage since the promulgation and implementation of the new Criminal procedure Law, and understands the specific situation and characteristics of lawyers' exercising their litigation rights in practice. The second part mainly discusses in practice, lawyers in the investigation stage of the exercise of the right to meet with some of the problems, mainly including the failure to see the suspects in time, meeting time and times of limited. Communication with investigators and so on, and then analyzes the causes of these problems, including subjective and objective aspects, for the next step to improve the relevant laws and regulations. The third part is mainly about the further improvement of the lawyer's right of meeting in the investigation stage, mainly including the perfection of legislation and system, and the perfection of legislation, including the clarification of the right of meeting of criminal suspects. Establishing lawyer's right to be present and perfecting the relief system of lawyer's right of meeting; The perfection of the system includes reforming the system of custody supervision, establishing the system of judicial review, perfecting the system of reward and punishment and examination, in addition, changing the concept of the personnel handling the case and improving the quality of the case handlers and lawyers.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D925.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前6條

1 田文昌,李貴方;偵查階段律師會見的比較[J];中國司法;2005年07期

2 孫長永;;偵查階段律師辯護(hù)制度立法的三大疑難問題管見[J];法學(xué);2008年07期

3 田文昌;;新《律師法》與《刑事訴訟法》的沖突、互動與銜接[J];法學(xué);2008年07期

4 黃卓婭;梁霞;;律師會見權(quán)難以實現(xiàn)的原因及對策[J];黑龍江省政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報;2010年04期

5 鄭金玉;;律師會見權(quán)實現(xiàn)的現(xiàn)實難題[J];前沿;2009年08期

6 李忠誠;;律師會見權(quán)和閱卷權(quán)問題[J];人民檢察;2008年07期

本文編號：1458166