本文關(guān)鍵詞：刑事和解適用之實體條件　出處：《湖南大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 刑事和解 實體條件 社會危害性 人身危險性

【摘要】：刑訴法在特別程序中規(guī)定了刑事和解適用的一般法定條件,而在司法實踐中被簡化為兩大條件即屬于符合法定范圍的刑事案件、賠償損失簽訂刑事和解協(xié)議,只要符合這兩大條件的案件,就適用刑事和解予以從寬處理,這導(dǎo)致犯罪嫌疑人、被告人是“真”和解還是“假”和解難以判斷,這自然使該制度難脫人民群眾“以錢贖刑”之質(zhì)疑。這不僅使該制度設(shè)計之初的期待值大幅降低,同時也削弱了刑罰的預(yù)防功能。刑事和解實體條件是隱藏在法定條件之中的,法定條件包括屬于特定案件范圍,犯罪嫌疑人、被告人真誠悔罪,取得被害人諒解,五年內(nèi)沒有故意犯罪,這些無不在昭示著適用刑事和解要求具備兩個實體條件即行為社會危害性較小、行為人人身危險性低。從理論上分析社會危害性小、人身危險性低在刑事和解中的功能,也為適用刑事和解可以從寬處罰提供了刑法理論上的支撐。如何在實踐中把握實體條件,如何將刑事和解實體條件適用于具體案件中,首先在把握法定條件,因為法定條件即為實體條件的具體化,同時也要注意實體條件對刑事和解適用的制約作用,如無悔改之意的單純賠償是不能成為證明行為人身危險性較小的事實。其次對于社會危害性小、人身危險性低的犯罪嫌疑人、被告人不能一刀切的全部適用免除、從輕或減輕處罰,需要結(jié)合刑法對犯罪情節(jié)不同相對應(yīng)不同處理結(jié)果的規(guī)定來確定刑事和解案件犯罪嫌疑人是法定不起訴、酌定不起訴還是免除處罰、從輕或減輕處罰。
[Abstract]:The Criminal procedure Law stipulates the general legal conditions for the application of criminal reconciliation in the special procedure, but in judicial practice, it is simplified into two major conditions, that is, the criminal case that conforms to the legal scope, and the criminal settlement agreement is signed to compensate for the loss. As long as these two conditions meet the case, the application of criminal reconciliation should be lenient, which leads to the criminal suspects, the accused is "true" reconciliation or "false" reconciliation difficult to judge. This naturally makes the system difficult to get rid of the people's question of "penalization with money", which not only makes the initial expectations of the system greatly reduced. At the same time, it also weakens the preventive function of the penalty. The substantive conditions of criminal reconciliation are hidden in the legal conditions. The legal conditions include the specific case scope, the criminal suspects and the accused sincere repentance. To obtain understanding of victims, no intentional crime within five years, these all show that the application of criminal reconciliation requires that there are two substantive conditions, that is, the conduct of social harm is relatively small. In theory, the author analyzes the function of low social harmfulness and low personal danger in the process of criminal reconciliation. Also for the application of criminal reconciliation can be lenient punishment to provide the theoretical support of criminal law. How to grasp the substantive conditions in practice, how to apply the substantive conditions of criminal reconciliation in specific cases, first of all in the grasp of legal conditions. Because the legal conditions are the materialization of the substantive conditions, at the same time, we should pay attention to the substantive conditions of the criminal reconciliation of the application of constraints. If the simple compensation without repentance can not become the fact that the behavior is less dangerous. Secondly, it is a criminal suspect with small social harm and low personal risk. The defendant can not be all applicable to the exemption, lenient or mitigated punishment, need to combine the criminal law with different circumstances corresponding to different treatment results to determine the criminal reconciliation case suspects are legal not to prosecute. Discretion not to prosecute or exempt from punishment, lighter or mitigated punishment.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：湖南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：D925.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前3條

1 陳光中;葛琳;;刑事和解初探[J];中國法學(xué);2006年05期

2 劉凌梅;西方國家刑事和解理論與實踐介評[J];現(xiàn)代法學(xué);2001年01期

3 陳興良;;論人身危險性及其刑法意義[J];法學(xué)研究;1993年02期

，

本文編號：1376692