本文關(guān)鍵詞：論我國死刑犯的會(huì)見權(quán)　出處：《廣西大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 死刑犯 死刑執(zhí)行程序 會(huì)見權(quán) 親屬

【摘要】：隨著人權(quán)思想的傳播,人道主義深入人心,死刑犯權(quán)利的保護(hù)成為人們關(guān)注的焦點(diǎn)。在呼吁人性回歸的今天,死刑犯的會(huì)見權(quán)成為備受社會(huì)爭議的話題,由于思想觀念的桎梏,會(huì)見制度的缺失以及執(zhí)法人員的不規(guī)范執(zhí)法,客觀條件的制約,導(dǎo)致死刑犯及其親屬在死刑執(zhí)行前不能如愿相見。 本文采用案例分析法、比較分析法、語義分析法等方法,通過法條和案例的分析,梳理死刑犯的會(huì)見權(quán)的概念、特點(diǎn)、功能等基本理論,在分析國內(nèi)外發(fā)展現(xiàn)狀的基礎(chǔ)上,發(fā)現(xiàn)實(shí)踐中存在問題以及原因,提出相應(yīng)的完善措施保障死刑犯會(huì)見權(quán)的實(shí)現(xiàn)。 本文從以下幾個(gè)部分對(duì)該問題論述： 引言,通過曾成杰死刑執(zhí)行案引出文章的話題,對(duì)該案進(jìn)行簡單的分析,找出問題的關(guān)鍵所在,即本文的論點(diǎn)。 第一部分,結(jié)合司法解釋第423條對(duì)會(huì)見權(quán)的主體和內(nèi)容,概括概念,通過對(duì)權(quán)利特點(diǎn)、功能的分析,準(zhǔn)確把握死刑犯的會(huì)見權(quán)的重要性, 第二部分,對(duì)美國、日本的死刑犯會(huì)見權(quán)的簡單介紹,了解國外該權(quán)利保護(hù)狀況,通過對(duì)我國建國以來在立法和司法實(shí)踐中發(fā)展的闡述,分析我國死刑犯會(huì)見權(quán)的現(xiàn)狀。 第三部分,在第三部分的基礎(chǔ)上,找出我國死刑犯會(huì)見權(quán)存在問題的表現(xiàn),并從思想觀念、制度設(shè)計(jì)、客觀條件三方面對(duì)問題的原因進(jìn)行分析。 第四部分,結(jié)合國內(nèi)外立法和司法實(shí)踐的經(jīng)驗(yàn),提出完善建議,主要涉及思想認(rèn)識(shí)、會(huì)見程序、監(jiān)督和責(zé)任制度以及物質(zhì)條件的改善等。
[Abstract]:With the spread of the idea of human rights, humanitarian support, protection of the rights of the condemned to become the focus of attention in the appeal to the return of humanity today, condemned the meeting right has become a social issue, because of the shackles of ideas, with lack of system and law enforcement officers do not standardize law enforcement, objective conditions, lead to death and relatives on the death penalty can't be met before.
This paper uses the method of case analysis, comparative analysis, semantic analysis and other methods, through the analysis of the law and the case, the concept of combing the death row met with the right characteristics, basic theory of function, based on the analysis of the development status at home and abroad, to found the problem and reason existing in practice, put forward to realize the right of meeting measures to improve the security of death penalty accordingly.
This article discusses the problem from the following parts:
The introduction, through the death penalty execution case of Zeng Jie, leads to the topic of the article, carries on the simple analysis to this case, finds out the key point of the problem, that is the argument of this article.
The first part, combined with the 423rd judicial interpretations, summarizes the concept of the subjects and contents of the right to meet. Through the analysis of the characteristics and functions of the right, we can accurately grasp the importance of the right to meet with the death penalty.
The second part briefly introduces the right to meet the death penalty of the United States and Japan, and understands the status of the protection of foreign rights. By analyzing the development of legislation and judicial practice since the founding of PRC, it analyzes the status of the death penalty criminals' right to meet in China.
The third part, on the basis of the third part, finds out the problems of the death penalty criminals' right to meet in China, and analyzes the causes of the problems from three aspects: ideology, system design and objective conditions.
The fourth part, combined with the experience of legislation and judicial practice at home and abroad, puts forward suggestions for improvement, mainly involving ideological understanding, meeting procedure, supervision and responsibility system, and improvement of material conditions.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：廣西大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D925.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 馬章民;杜一鳴;;死刑犯的權(quán)益保障[J];河北法學(xué);2007年09期

2 劉一敉;;死刑執(zhí)行程序中的權(quán)益保障[J];今日南國(理論創(chuàng)新版);2009年06期

3 吳正鼎;;死刑立即執(zhí)行監(jiān)督研究[J];吉首大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2010年06期

4 焦陽;;簡論死刑犯的權(quán)利保障[J];南方論刊;2010年04期

5 曾賽剛;;中美日死刑的執(zhí)行比較研究[J];內(nèi)蒙古農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2008年05期

6 趙軍;徐留成;;論已核準(zhǔn)死囚犯應(yīng)享有的實(shí)體權(quán)利[J];人民司法;2005年04期

7 石聚航;周建達(dá);;論死刑犯實(shí)體權(quán)利保障的理論基礎(chǔ)[J];四川警察學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2011年01期

8 李勝昌;姜福先;;死刑犯和可能被處死刑者權(quán)利保護(hù)問題探究[J];山東審判;2007年03期

9 高一飛;張金霞;;日本的死刑執(zhí)行公開制度——兼論死刑執(zhí)行信息公開的限度[J];日本問題研究;2013年01期

10 楊帆;;關(guān)于死刑犯權(quán)利保障問題的思考與研究[J];中國社會(huì)科學(xué)院研究生院學(xué)報(bào);2011年01期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 于天敏;刑罰執(zhí)行程序研究[D];西南政法大學(xué);2012年

，

本文編號(hào)：1376950