海上貨物“門到門”運輸承運人責(zé)任制度研究
發(fā)布時間：2019-03-13 21:40
【摘要】： 目前世界海運貿(mào)易絕大多數(shù)集裝箱貨物都涉及“門到門”運輸?shù)亩嗍铰?lián)運。據(jù)統(tǒng)計,90%以上的多式聯(lián)運都包含海運區(qū)段在內(nèi),海運作為“門到門”運輸?shù)闹饕袚?dān)者,開始轉(zhuǎn)變模式,打破傳統(tǒng)的單一海運模式,準備引領(lǐng)“門到門”運輸?shù)呐畈l(fā)展。但是,由于現(xiàn)行的國際海上貨物運輸法律很不統(tǒng)一,海運界企盼制定一部統(tǒng)一的國際多式聯(lián)運公約,《聯(lián)合國全程或部分海上國際貨物運輸合同公約》(簡稱《鹿特丹規(guī)則》)應(yīng)運而生。鑒于航運實踐的發(fā)展,《鹿特丹規(guī)則》擯棄了傳統(tǒng)的多式聯(lián)運模式,采取了“海運+其他”模式從新定義“門到門”運輸,構(gòu)建了新的承運人責(zé)任制度體系。本文的寫作目的就是,研究“海運+其他”模式下的“門到門”運輸承運人責(zé)任制度,采用比較分析和歷史分析相結(jié)合的方法論述此種模式下承運人責(zé)任制度基本問題的適用。 本文第一章主要介紹海上貨物“門到門”運輸?shù)默F(xiàn)狀,分析了現(xiàn)行“門到門”運輸?shù)奶攸c,根據(jù)《鹿特丹規(guī)則》重新定義了“門到門”運輸,就承運人責(zé)任制度將規(guī)則構(gòu)建的新立法模式與多式聯(lián)運模式做了比較分析。 本文第二章以歷史分析的方法探尋國際海運承運人責(zé)任制度的沿革,同時立足最新立法成果,詳加研討承運人責(zé)任制度基本問題的發(fā)展方向。 本文第三章重點展開對“鹿特丹規(guī)則”承運人責(zé)任制度模式的利弊分析,尤其對“門到門”責(zé)任期間、“最小網(wǎng)狀責(zé)任制”、“首要義務(wù)原則”、履約人以及對貨方利益的考慮等問題進行了深入地比較分析。此外,為進一步加深對“鹿特丹規(guī)則”承運人責(zé)任制度模式內(nèi)涵的闡釋,本文還著力研究“鹿特丹規(guī)則”與其他國際單式運輸公約的法律適用沖突及其協(xié)調(diào)解決方案。 最后,針對《鹿特丹規(guī)則》體現(xiàn)的先進國際航運的立法理念和制度,提出對修改我國《海商法》關(guān)于承運人責(zé)任制度的借鑒意義,期望能對我國貨物多式聯(lián)運法律的研究和發(fā)展有所助益。
[Abstract]:At present, the vast majority of container goods in world seaborne trade are involved in door-to-door multimodal transport. According to statistics, more than 90% of multimodal transport includes maritime sectors, and maritime transport, as the main bearer of "door-to-door" transport, has begun to change its mode, break the traditional single mode of shipping, and prepare to lead the vigorous development of "door-to-door" transport. However, in view of the inconsistencies in the existing laws governing the international carriage of goods by sea, the maritime community is eager to develop a unified international convention on multimodal transport, The United Nations Convention on contracts for the International Carriage of goods wholly or partly by Sea (Rotterdam rules) emerged. In view of the development of shipping practice, Rotterdam rules abandon the traditional mode of multimodal transport, adopt "other modes of maritime transport" from the new definition of "door to door" transport, and construct a new system of carrier liability. The purpose of this paper is to study the "door-to-door" transport carrier liability system under the mode of "other maritime transportation", and to discuss the application of the basic problems of carrier liability system under this mode by means of the combination of comparative analysis and historical analysis. The first chapter of this paper mainly introduces the present situation of "door-to-door" transport of marine goods, analyzes the characteristics of the current "door-to-door" transport, and redefines the "door-to-door" transport according to the Rotterdam rules. This paper makes a comparative analysis between the new legislative model of carrier liability system and the multi-modal transport model. The second chapter explores the evolution of the liability system of the international maritime carrier by historical analysis, and discusses the development direction of the basic problems of the liability system of the carrier on the basis of the latest legislative achievements. The third chapter of this paper focuses on the analysis of the advantages and disadvantages of the "Rotterdam rules" mode of carrier liability system, especially for the period of "door-to-door" liability, the "minimum mesh responsibility system", "the principle of primary obligations", The renderers and the consideration of the interests of the shipper are compared and analyzed in depth. In addition, in order to further explain the connotation of the "Rotterdam rules" mode of carrier liability, this paper also focuses on the conflict between the Rotterdam rules and other international unitary transport conventions, and the coordinated solutions to the conflicts between the "Rotterdam rules" and other international unitary transport conventions. Finally, in view of the advanced international shipping legislative concept and system embodied in the Rotterdam rules, this paper puts forward the reference significance for amending the Maritime Code of our country concerning the carrier liability system. It is expected to be helpful to the research and development of the law of multimodal transport of goods in our country.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：大連海事大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2009
【分類號】：D996.19
本文編號：2439736
[Abstract]:At present, the vast majority of container goods in world seaborne trade are involved in door-to-door multimodal transport. According to statistics, more than 90% of multimodal transport includes maritime sectors, and maritime transport, as the main bearer of "door-to-door" transport, has begun to change its mode, break the traditional single mode of shipping, and prepare to lead the vigorous development of "door-to-door" transport. However, in view of the inconsistencies in the existing laws governing the international carriage of goods by sea, the maritime community is eager to develop a unified international convention on multimodal transport, The United Nations Convention on contracts for the International Carriage of goods wholly or partly by Sea (Rotterdam rules) emerged. In view of the development of shipping practice, Rotterdam rules abandon the traditional mode of multimodal transport, adopt "other modes of maritime transport" from the new definition of "door to door" transport, and construct a new system of carrier liability. The purpose of this paper is to study the "door-to-door" transport carrier liability system under the mode of "other maritime transportation", and to discuss the application of the basic problems of carrier liability system under this mode by means of the combination of comparative analysis and historical analysis. The first chapter of this paper mainly introduces the present situation of "door-to-door" transport of marine goods, analyzes the characteristics of the current "door-to-door" transport, and redefines the "door-to-door" transport according to the Rotterdam rules. This paper makes a comparative analysis between the new legislative model of carrier liability system and the multi-modal transport model. The second chapter explores the evolution of the liability system of the international maritime carrier by historical analysis, and discusses the development direction of the basic problems of the liability system of the carrier on the basis of the latest legislative achievements. The third chapter of this paper focuses on the analysis of the advantages and disadvantages of the "Rotterdam rules" mode of carrier liability system, especially for the period of "door-to-door" liability, the "minimum mesh responsibility system", "the principle of primary obligations", The renderers and the consideration of the interests of the shipper are compared and analyzed in depth. In addition, in order to further explain the connotation of the "Rotterdam rules" mode of carrier liability, this paper also focuses on the conflict between the Rotterdam rules and other international unitary transport conventions, and the coordinated solutions to the conflicts between the "Rotterdam rules" and other international unitary transport conventions. Finally, in view of the advanced international shipping legislative concept and system embodied in the Rotterdam rules, this paper puts forward the reference significance for amending the Maritime Code of our country concerning the carrier liability system. It is expected to be helpful to the research and development of the law of multimodal transport of goods in our country.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：大連海事大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2009
【分類號】：D996.19
【引證文獻】
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條
1 陳丹輝;國際海運承運人責(zé)任制度研究[D];西北大學(xué);2011年
2 陳志榮;論我國《海商法》承運人責(zé)任基礎(chǔ)的修改[D];吉林大學(xué);2011年
3 李瑋;《鹿特丹規(guī)則》非海運區(qū)段規(guī)定對我國內(nèi)陸運輸?shù)挠绊懷芯縖D];大連海事大學(xué);2011年
4 伍健鴻;《鹿特丹規(guī)則》下承運人責(zé)任制度研究[D];華東理工大學(xué);2012年
5 羅益忠;論中國海商法與《鹿特丹規(guī)則》的沖突與協(xié)調(diào)[D];復(fù)旦大學(xué);2011年
6 楊裕武;《鹿特丹規(guī)則》中承運人責(zé)任制度研究[D];西南政法大學(xué);2010年
7 陸們;《鹿特丹規(guī)則》對多式聯(lián)運經(jīng)營人責(zé)任的影響及對我國的啟示[D];大連海事大學(xué);2012年
8 鄔海瑩;《鹿特丹規(guī)則》中海運履約方制度研究[D];南昌大學(xué);2012年
9 黃霏茜;基于低碳運輸?shù)拇筮B港集裝箱海鐵聯(lián)運效益分析[D];大連海事大學(xué);2012年
10 張菡;《鹿特丹規(guī)則》的局限性分析[D];山東大學(xué);2012年
，本文編號：2439736
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/sflw/2439736.html
