【摘要】：隨著現(xiàn)代社會(huì)的快速發(fā)展,公民所擁有財(cái)產(chǎn)的類型越來(lái)越多,但繼承法對(duì)于公民可繼承的財(cái)產(chǎn)規(guī)定卻沒(méi)有隨之增加。根據(jù)《繼承法》第三條中對(duì)遺產(chǎn)的規(guī)定:“遺產(chǎn)是公民死亡時(shí)遺留的個(gè)人合法財(cái)產(chǎn),包括:(一)公民的收入;(二)公民的房屋、儲(chǔ)蓄和生活用品;(三)公民的林木、牲畜和家禽;(四)公民的文物、圖書資料;(五)法律允許公民所有的生產(chǎn)資料;(六)公民的著作權(quán)、專利權(quán)中的財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)利;(七)公民的其他合法財(cái)產(chǎn)�！蔽覈�(guó)對(duì)于遺產(chǎn)的規(guī)定采用的是列舉式的規(guī)定,雖然在第三條第七款中規(guī)定了“公民的其他合法財(cái)產(chǎn)”也屬于遺產(chǎn)的范圍,但因該條款規(guī)定的十分模糊,導(dǎo)致在司法實(shí)踐中,對(duì)于某些《繼承法》中沒(méi)有明確規(guī)定的財(cái)產(chǎn)能否作為遺產(chǎn)產(chǎn)生了爭(zhēng)議。因此,對(duì)于這些財(cái)產(chǎn)能否作為遺產(chǎn)的研究顯得十分重要。文章主要從實(shí)踐角度入手,通過(guò)司法實(shí)踐中經(jīng)典的案例引出所要研究的法律問(wèn)題,進(jìn)而深入分析該種爭(zhēng)議財(cái)產(chǎn)是否應(yīng)該作為死者遺產(chǎn),最終通過(guò)研究得出結(jié)論并對(duì)案例進(jìn)行回扣分析。本文除前言外,共有四章內(nèi)容主要是針對(duì)數(shù)字財(cái)產(chǎn)、土地承包經(jīng)營(yíng)權(quán)、死亡賠償金和股權(quán)四種常見(jiàn)的爭(zhēng)議較大的財(cái)產(chǎn)是否能夠作為遺產(chǎn)問(wèn)題進(jìn)行深入分析研究。其中文章首先針對(duì)數(shù)字財(cái)產(chǎn)能否作為遺產(chǎn)的研究。本部分主要分析和解決了數(shù)字財(cái)產(chǎn)是否屬于遺產(chǎn),以及數(shù)字財(cái)產(chǎn)作為遺產(chǎn)應(yīng)該如何繼承的問(wèn)題。其次,通過(guò)對(duì)于民事經(jīng)典案例的分析,借鑒了韓國(guó)、臺(tái)灣等國(guó)家對(duì)于類似權(quán)利有關(guān)繼承的相關(guān)規(guī)定后,解決了有關(guān)我國(guó)土地承包經(jīng)營(yíng)權(quán)是否能夠繼承,以及土地承包經(jīng)營(yíng)權(quán)在不同情形下的繼承方式選擇等問(wèn)題。隨后是對(duì)現(xiàn)階段爭(zhēng)議較大的死亡賠償金能否繼承的分析研究。本部分通過(guò)對(duì)于死亡賠償金的性質(zhì)的界定,深入分析了死亡賠償金是否應(yīng)該作為遺產(chǎn)繼承的問(wèn)題,以及對(duì)于死亡賠償金作為遺產(chǎn)繼承時(shí)應(yīng)該注意的問(wèn)題進(jìn)行了分析和解決。最后,文章主要是對(duì)有限責(zé)任公司股權(quán)能否作為遺產(chǎn)繼承的研究。股權(quán)作為現(xiàn)在經(jīng)濟(jì)生活中必不可少的部分,也越來(lái)越多的走進(jìn)公民的生活。對(duì)于股權(quán)能否繼承問(wèn)題,該章節(jié)從實(shí)際的案例出發(fā),引出問(wèn)題,針對(duì)股權(quán)能否繼承以及繼承的程序等問(wèn)題進(jìn)行了仔細(xì)的研究和分析。
[Abstract]:With the rapid development of modern society, there are more and more types of property owned by citizens, but the provisions of inheritance law for citizens' inheritable property do not increase accordingly. According to the provisions of article 3 of the Law on inheritance, "the estate is the legal property of the individual left upon the death of a citizen, including: (I) the income of the citizen; (II) the house, savings and household supplies of the citizen;" (3) trees, livestock and poultry of citizens; (4) cultural relics, books and materials of citizens; (5) means of production owned by citizens by law; (6) citizens' copyright and property rights in patent rights; (7) other lawful property of a citizen. " The provisions of our country on heritage are enumerated. Although article 3, paragraph 7, provides that "other lawful property of citizens" also falls within the scope of heritage, it is very vague because of this provision, which leads to judicial practice. There is a dispute as to whether some property which is not specified in the inheritance Law can be regarded as an inheritance. Therefore, it is very important to study whether these properties can be regarded as heritage. The article mainly from the practice angle, through the judicial practice classic case leads to the legal issues to be studied, and then in-depth analysis of whether this kind of disputed property should be regarded as the estate of the deceased. Finally through the study to draw a conclusion and the case of kickback analysis. In addition to the preface, four chapters mainly focus on the digital property, the land contract management right, the death compensation and the ownership of the four common controversial property can be considered as heritage issues for in-depth analysis. First of all, the article focuses on the study of whether digital property can be regarded as heritage. This part mainly analyzes and solves the problem of whether digital property belongs to heritage and how digital property should be inherited as a legacy. Secondly, through the analysis of the civil classic cases, after drawing lessons from the relevant provisions of the Republic of Korea, Taiwan and other countries on the succession of similar rights, it has resolved whether the contracted management rights of land in China can inherit or not. And the choice of inheritance mode of land contractual management right under different circumstances and so on. Then there is an analysis and research on the inheritance of the death compensation which is controversial at this stage. Through the definition of the nature of death compensation, this part deeply analyzes the question of whether death compensation should be regarded as inheritance, and analyzes and solves the problems that should be paid attention to when death compensation is regarded as inheritance. Finally, the article is mainly to the limited liability company equity as a inheritance of the study. As an indispensable part of the current economic life, equity is also more and more into the life of citizens. This chapter starts from the actual case and leads to the problem of whether the stock right can inherit and the procedure of the inheritance is carefully studied and analyzed in this chapter.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：沈陽(yáng)師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號(hào)】：D923.5

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 ;法律常識(shí)[J];農(nóng)村.農(nóng)業(yè).農(nóng)民(B版);2010年04期

2 檀林飛;;遺產(chǎn)酌分請(qǐng)求權(quán)制度若干問(wèn)題探討[J];湖北警官學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2012年02期

3 長(zhǎng)水;“照顧”與“繼承”不能混為一談[J];法學(xué);1983年06期

4 ;房屋繼承[J];農(nóng)家之友;1996年03期

5 檀釗;;遺產(chǎn)歸扣制度不宜本土化[J];長(zhǎng)江大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2013年11期

6 王冬梅;;論我國(guó)繼承法對(duì)被繼承人債務(wù)的處理規(guī)定存在的不足[J];科技信息;2006年S2期

7 羅佩華;;遺產(chǎn)的處理[J];北京宣武紅旗業(yè)余大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2006年04期

8 徐文文;;被繼承人債務(wù)清償糾紛審判實(shí)務(wù)若干問(wèn)題探討——兼論遺產(chǎn)債務(wù)清償制度的完善[J];東方法學(xué);2013年04期

9 任景龍;對(duì)遺產(chǎn)繼承中被繼承人債務(wù)清償?shù)目捶╗J];河北法學(xué);1985年04期

10 李仁玉;;遺產(chǎn)淺析[J];法學(xué)雜志;1985年01期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前4條

1 倪曉晶;;淺析遺產(chǎn)債權(quán)清償責(zé)任若干問(wèn)題[A];當(dāng)代法學(xué)論壇（2008年第4輯）[C];2008年

2 蔣超;倪s，

本文編號(hào)：2442178