【摘要】：如果人工智能生成的內(nèi)容在表現(xiàn)形式上不符合作品的構(gòu)成要件,如計算機生成的無獨創(chuàng)性數(shù)據(jù)庫,當然不能作為作品受到保護。但如果人工智能生成的內(nèi)容在表現(xiàn)形式與人類創(chuàng)作的作品類似,如機器人繪制的圖畫、寫出的新聞報道或譜出的樂曲,則需要從其產(chǎn)生過程判斷其是否構(gòu)成作品。迄今為止這些內(nèi)容都是應用算法、規(guī)則和模板的結(jié)果,不能體現(xiàn)創(chuàng)作者獨特的個性,并不能被認定為作品。在不披露相關(guān)內(nèi)容由人工智能生成時,該內(nèi)容可能因具備作品的表現(xiàn)形式而實際受到了保護,但該現(xiàn)象是舉證規(guī)則造成的,并不意味著著作權(quán)法因人工智能而改變。
[Abstract]:If the content generated by artificial intelligence does not meet the requirements of the composition of the work, such as the non-original database generated by computer, of course, it cannot be protected as a work. But if the content generated by artificial intelligence is similar to the work created by human beings, such as the drawing made by robot, the news report or the music written by the robot, it is necessary to judge whether the work is composed of it or not from the process of its production. So far, these contents are the result of applied algorithms, rules and templates, which can not reflect the unique personality of the creators and cannot be regarded as works. In the absence of disclosure that the relevant content is generated by artificial intelligence, the content may actually be protected by having the form of expression of the work, but the phenomenon is caused by the rule of proof and does not mean that the copyright law is changed by artificial intelligence.
【作者單位】： 華東政法大學知識產(chǎn)權(quán)學院;
【基金】：國家社會科學基金重大項目(14ZDC020)“互聯(lián)網(wǎng)領(lǐng)域知識產(chǎn)權(quán)重大立法問題研究”
【分類號】：D913
，

本文編號：2399730