【摘要】：我國的外觀設(shè)計專利一直存在著數(shù)量龐大但質(zhì)量不高的尷尬局面,這種情況的出現(xiàn)是由許多原因造成的,我國作為一個制造業(yè)大國,每年都會出現(xiàn)大量的外觀設(shè)計專利糾紛案件,盡管經(jīng)過了三次修改之后的《專利法》已經(jīng)明確了原先存在的許多問題,但是筆者發(fā)現(xiàn),對于一些最近出現(xiàn)的、案情比較復(fù)雜的判例,外觀設(shè)計專利權(quán)人的利益仍然可能得不到良好的保護(hù),尤其是在侵權(quán)判定主體和侵權(quán)判定標(biāo)準(zhǔn)方面仍然存在著比較明顯的爭議和模糊的法律空間。針對這種情況,有必要結(jié)合具體案例對外觀設(shè)計侵權(quán)判定的部分理論進(jìn)行研究。全文共分為五章第一章緒論主要闡述了外觀設(shè)計的歷史沿革、現(xiàn)狀以及最新的發(fā)展情況,首先以法國為源頭,介紹法國、英國、日本、美國等主要西方國家外觀設(shè)計法律制度的建立歷史。然后介紹了中國的知識產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)體系和外觀設(shè)計保護(hù)法律法規(guī)從無到有不斷完善至今的歷史進(jìn)程。第二章提出了外觀設(shè)計保護(hù)存在的問題,即創(chuàng)新程度普遍不高、缺乏創(chuàng)新點(diǎn)的垃圾專利大量存在。進(jìn)而分析了問題產(chǎn)生的主要原因。第三章細(xì)化分析外觀設(shè)計侵權(quán)判定的主體,先分別介紹了美國、英國、歐盟、日本對于外觀設(shè)計侵權(quán)判定主體的法律規(guī)定,再結(jié)合具體案例分析幾種特殊情況下的外觀設(shè)計侵權(quán)判定主體的選擇。第四章闡述了外觀設(shè)計侵權(quán)判定的標(biāo)準(zhǔn),主要分為混淆標(biāo)準(zhǔn)和創(chuàng)新標(biāo)準(zhǔn)。首先引用了菲亞特起訴長城汽車的案件,來分析混淆標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的弊端和不足,包括了內(nèi)涵模糊不清、缺乏理論立足點(diǎn)和有欠社會公正性。其次結(jié)合蘇泊爾與九陽之間的外觀設(shè)計專利糾紛案,進(jìn)一步闡述了混淆標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的弊端和創(chuàng)新標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的優(yōu)越性。第五章提出了一些對于外觀設(shè)計侵權(quán)判定的建議,主要包括兩點(diǎn),首先對于不同類型的產(chǎn)品,在侵權(quán)判定主體上要進(jìn)行細(xì)分,主要分為非日常用品、購買者與使用者不同、中間產(chǎn)品。其次為了彌補(bǔ)混淆標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的缺陷和不足,建議應(yīng)該逐漸將混淆標(biāo)準(zhǔn)改為創(chuàng)新標(biāo)準(zhǔn),以創(chuàng)新標(biāo)準(zhǔn)作為判斷兩者是否相似和相同的依據(jù)。
[Abstract]:There has always been an embarrassing situation of large quantity but low quality of design patents in China, which is caused by many reasons. As a large manufacturing country, China is a big manufacturing country. Every year there are a large number of patent disputes over designs. Although the Patent Law, which has been amended three times, has identified many problems, the author finds that, for some of the most recent cases, Because of the complicated case law, the interests of the design patentee may not be well protected, especially in the subject of infringement judgment and the judgment standard of infringement, there are still obvious disputes and vague legal space. In view of this situation, it is necessary to study part of the theory of design tort judgment combined with specific cases. The paper is divided into five chapters: the first chapter introduces the history, the present situation and the latest development of the design. First of all, taking France as the source, it introduces France, Britain and Japan. The history of the establishment of the legal system of design in the United States and other major western countries. Then it introduces the system of intellectual property protection and the laws and regulations of design protection in China. In the second chapter, the problems of design protection are put forward, that is, the degree of innovation is not high, and the garbage patents which lack innovation point exist in large quantities. Then the main causes of the problem are analyzed. The third chapter analyzes the main body of the design tort judgment. First, it introduces the laws and regulations of the main body of the design tort adjudication in the United States, the United Kingdom, the European Union and Japan, respectively. Combined with specific cases, this paper analyzes the choice of the main body of the design tort judgment under several special circumstances. The fourth chapter elaborates the standard of design tort judgment, mainly divided into confusion standard and innovation standard. This paper first cited Fiat's lawsuit against the Great Wall to analyze the shortcomings and shortcomings of the confusion standard, including vague connotation, lack of theoretical foothold and lack of social justice. Secondly, combined with the patent dispute between Supor and Jiuyang, the disadvantages of confusion standard and the superiority of innovation standard are further expounded. The fifth chapter puts forward some suggestions for the design infringement judgment, mainly including two points. Firstly, for different types of products, the main body of infringement judgment should be subdivided into non-daily items, buyers and users are different. Intermediate products. Secondly, in order to make up for the defects and shortcomings of the confusion standard, it is suggested that the confusion standard should be changed into the innovation standard gradually, and the innovation standard should be taken as the basis to judge whether the two standards are similar or not.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華南理工大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：D923.42

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 崔崢;路傳亮;;試論工業(yè)品外觀設(shè)計專利的實(shí)用性——兼談對外觀設(shè)計定義中“適于工業(yè)應(yīng)用”的理解與思考[J];中國發(fā)明與專利;2012年02期

2 范文;;工業(yè)品外觀設(shè)計法律保護(hù)現(xiàn)狀及對策研究[J];法制與社會;2008年18期

3 梁浩;;產(chǎn)品部分外觀設(shè)計保護(hù)[J];法制與社會;2010年02期

4 陳建民;;外觀設(shè)計色彩保護(hù)的法律思考[J];中國發(fā)明與專利;2008年04期

5 徐婷妍;;淺析設(shè)計空間在外觀設(shè)計專利對比判定中的運(yùn)用[J];中國發(fā)明與專利;2013年11期

6 高躍;;淺談“美感”在外觀設(shè)計專利中的地位與授權(quán)中的應(yīng)用[J];中國發(fā)明與專利;2013年11期

7 胡充寒;;我國外觀設(shè)計定義之應(yīng)然性重構(gòu)[J];科技與法律;2009年06期

8 李華,李美麗;專利技術(shù)的在先使用問題研究[J];西南政法大學(xué)學(xué)報;2004年01期

9 鐘華;;試析外觀設(shè)計相近似性的判斷主體[J];中國專利與商標(biāo);2007年04期

10 郭壽康;;一片爆竹聲 迎來專利法——在中國專利法頒布30周年座談會上的發(fā)言[J];知識產(chǎn)權(quán);2014年03期

，

本文編號：2366546