【摘要】：隨著我國(guó)市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)的日益發(fā)展壯大,活躍的市場(chǎng)必然會(huì)伴隨著眾多租賃關(guān)系產(chǎn)生,房屋(不動(dòng)產(chǎn))的租賃更是與人們的生活息息相關(guān)。房屋(不動(dòng)產(chǎn))的租賃主要包括常見兩種用途的租賃:居民居住用房租賃與商業(yè)用房租賃。居民居住用房租賃關(guān)系到承租人日常生活基本安定問題,近年來(lái)在我國(guó)雖然出臺(tái)了一系列保障居民用房的優(yōu)惠制度,如廉租房、公租房、安置房等制度,但這遠(yuǎn)遠(yuǎn)不能滿足我國(guó)廣大居民的居住用房需求,所以居住用房租賃在保證廣大居民居所安定的過程中仍然扮演著重要的角色。而商業(yè)租賃則關(guān)系到整個(gè)社會(huì)經(jīng)濟(jì)秩序的穩(wěn)定問題,有句古話“百年之商,勿遷良地”,一處穩(wěn)定的商業(yè)經(jīng)營(yíng)場(chǎng)所,不僅關(guān)系到該商家的持續(xù)發(fā)展,更是代表著商家的商譽(yù)所在。目前,不管是在居住用房租賃關(guān)系還是在商事租賃關(guān)系中,出租人都占有絕對(duì)的主導(dǎo)權(quán),此時(shí)優(yōu)先承租權(quán)的提出對(duì)承租人的意義不言而喻。但在實(shí)踐無(wú)法可依的情況下,如何認(rèn)定承租人是否享有優(yōu)先承租權(quán)?優(yōu)先承租權(quán)成立的條件又是什么?其“同等條件”該如何理解?這都是在民事審理過程中棘手的難題。因此本文希望通過對(duì)一則真實(shí)案例進(jìn)行剖析和理解,提取出其中爭(zhēng)議焦點(diǎn)優(yōu)先承租權(quán)這一問題;通過第二章對(duì)優(yōu)先承租權(quán)的概念分析、與相關(guān)概念辨析、性質(zhì)闡述、同等條件理解,提出筆者對(duì)優(yōu)先承租權(quán)的概念、性質(zhì)以及其行使條件的看法。最后針對(duì)上述具體案情分析本案原告主張的優(yōu)先承租權(quán)并得出結(jié)論,認(rèn)定原告袁公華在原房屋租賃合同的基礎(chǔ)上本當(dāng)享有優(yōu)先承租權(quán),進(jìn)而提出若干的思考建議,望對(duì)以后類似案例有所裨益。
[Abstract]:With the increasing development of market economy in China, the active market will inevitably come into being with many leasing relationships, and the lease of housing (real estate) is closely related to people's life. Housing (real estate) leases mainly include two common uses: residential rental and commercial rental. In recent years, a series of preferential systems have been introduced in our country to protect the residents' housing, such as low-rent housing, public rental housing, resettlement housing and so on. However, this is far from meeting the residential housing needs of the vast number of residents in China, so residential rental still plays an important role in the process of ensuring the residents' residence stability. Commercial leasing is related to the stability of the whole social and economic order. There is an old saying that "after a hundred years of business, do not move to good land", a stable business place, not only related to the continued development of the business, It also represents the goodwill of the business. At present, the lessor has the absolute leading right, whether in the residential rental relationship or the commercial lease relationship, at this time, the priority of the leasehold right is self-evident to the lessee. However, in practice can not be based on the case, how to determine whether the lessee has priority lease right? What are the conditions for the establishment of the preferential tenancy right? How should the "equal conditions" be understood? These are difficult problems in the civil proceedings. Therefore, this paper hopes to analyze and understand a real case, and extract the issue of priority lease right in the focus of dispute. In the second chapter, the author analyzes the concept of priority lease right, analyzes the related concepts, expounds the nature and understanding of the same conditions, and puts forward the author's views on the concept, nature and exercise conditions of the priority lease right. Finally, in view of the above specific case, the author analyzes the plaintiff's preferential lease right and draws a conclusion, and concludes that Yuan Gonghua, the plaintiff, should enjoy the preferential lease right on the basis of the original house lease contract, and then puts forward a number of thinking suggestions. I hope it will be helpful for similar cases in the future.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南科技大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號(hào)】：D923.6
，

本文編號(hào)：2353008