異議登記效力和注銷問題的再思考——以異議登記效力期間為視角
發(fā)布時(shí)間:2018-11-10 06:39
【摘要】:異議登記是否具有限制權(quán)利人處分登記財(cái)產(chǎn)的效力,應(yīng)結(jié)合文義、體系和比較法等多種解釋方法予以把握。我國法律特設(shè)異議登記效力期間制度,較好地平衡了當(dāng)事人之間的權(quán)利和義務(wù),在此之下,采取不限制處分的立法模式具有更高的制度效率,不動(dòng)產(chǎn)統(tǒng)一登記條例應(yīng)予采納。異議登記效力期間制度也影響異議登記注銷模式的選擇,我國法律應(yīng)允許登記機(jī)關(guān)在異議登記效力期間屆滿失效后依職權(quán)注銷異議登記。
[Abstract]:Whether the objection registration has the effect of restricting the right holder to dispose of the registered property should be grasped by combining with various interpretation methods, such as text meaning, system and comparative law. The system of special objection registration period in our country has well balanced the rights and obligations between the parties. Under this system, it is more efficient to adopt the legislative mode of not limiting the disposition, and the uniform registration regulations of immovable property should be adopted. The system of validity period of dissenting registration also affects the choice of cancellation mode of dissent registration. Our law should allow the registration authority to cancel dissent registration ex officio after the expiration of the validity period of dissent registration.
【作者單位】: 中國政法大學(xué)民商經(jīng)濟(jì)法學(xué)院;
【分類號】:D923.2
本文編號:2321635
[Abstract]:Whether the objection registration has the effect of restricting the right holder to dispose of the registered property should be grasped by combining with various interpretation methods, such as text meaning, system and comparative law. The system of special objection registration period in our country has well balanced the rights and obligations between the parties. Under this system, it is more efficient to adopt the legislative mode of not limiting the disposition, and the uniform registration regulations of immovable property should be adopted. The system of validity period of dissenting registration also affects the choice of cancellation mode of dissent registration. Our law should allow the registration authority to cancel dissent registration ex officio after the expiration of the validity period of dissent registration.
【作者單位】: 中國政法大學(xué)民商經(jīng)濟(jì)法學(xué)院;
【分類號】:D923.2
【相似文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前3條
1 董慧凝,趙敏燕;論商法中商業(yè)登記的效力——兼論對我國商業(yè)登記效力的思考[J];東北財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2005年01期
2 阮孝學(xué),杜曉智;《合同法》中登記效力研究[J];周口師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2004年01期
3 郭曉丹,陳月紅;論我國抵押登記效力的立法選擇[J];華北水利水電學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社科版);2003年04期
相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前2條
1 羅恒軍;質(zhì)押車子未登記效力不及第三人[N];法治快報(bào);2010年
2 馮軍;析民商法中登記效力的三種情形[N];江蘇經(jīng)濟(jì)報(bào);2002年
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條
1 徐人杰;機(jī)動(dòng)車登記效力的三個(gè)基本問題研究[D];煙臺(tái)大學(xué);2011年
,本文編號:2321635
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/minfalunwen/2321635.html
最近更新
教材專著