《民法總則》第123條的功能考察——兼論知識產權法典化的未來發(fā)展
發(fā)布時間：2018-11-09 18:07
【摘要】：《民法總則》第123條是我國民法典中唯一一條對知識產權進行集中性規(guī)定的條文。該條在功能上存在著諸多不足,其價值宣示功能被弱化,統(tǒng)領法律體系功能存在缺位,促進法學研究的功能尚有限,未必能有效地實現立法者所期望達成的目的。在民法典編纂的軌跡之外,知識產權領域本身也在走一條逐步體系化并最終邁向法典化的道路,許多國家先后制定了單獨的知識產權法典。立法者應從促進知識產權法律的體系化、宣示知識產權國家戰(zhàn)略和刺激知識產權研究等方面出發(fā),適時啟動我國知識產權法典的編纂工作。
[Abstract]:Article 123 of the Civil Code is the only article in the Civil Code that provides centralized provisions on intellectual property rights. There are many deficiencies in the function of this article, the function of value declaration is weakened, the function of commanding legal system is absent, and the function of promoting legal research is still limited, which may not be able to achieve the purpose that legislators expect to achieve effectively. In addition to the track of the compilation of civil code, the field of intellectual property itself is also following a path of gradual systematization and finally towards codification. Many countries have formulated separate intellectual property codes one after another. In order to promote the systematization of intellectual property law, proclaim the national strategy of intellectual property and stimulate the research of intellectual property, the legislator should start the codification of intellectual property code in good time.
【作者單位】： 中南財經政法大學知識產權研究中心;
【基金】：國家知識產權局軟科學研究項目“我國民法典中知識產權部分主要內容研究”(項目編號:SS16-A-01)的階段性成果
【分類號】：D923
本文編號：2321171
[Abstract]:Article 123 of the Civil Code is the only article in the Civil Code that provides centralized provisions on intellectual property rights. There are many deficiencies in the function of this article, the function of value declaration is weakened, the function of commanding legal system is absent, and the function of promoting legal research is still limited, which may not be able to achieve the purpose that legislators expect to achieve effectively. In addition to the track of the compilation of civil code, the field of intellectual property itself is also following a path of gradual systematization and finally towards codification. Many countries have formulated separate intellectual property codes one after another. In order to promote the systematization of intellectual property law, proclaim the national strategy of intellectual property and stimulate the research of intellectual property, the legislator should start the codification of intellectual property code in good time.
【作者單位】： 中南財經政法大學知識產權研究中心;
【基金】：國家知識產權局軟科學研究項目“我國民法典中知識產權部分主要內容研究”(項目編號:SS16-A-01)的階段性成果
【分類號】：D923
【相似文獻】
相關期刊論文 前2條
1 胡承偉;;關鍵設施理論與知識產權拒絕許可的反壟斷規(guī)制[J];濱州學院學報;2014年02期
2 ;時訊點擊[J];法律與生活;2014年11期
相關碩士學位論文 前1條
1 吳栓荻;新常態(tài)下我國知識產權邊境措施完善問題研究[D];廣西大學;2017年
，本文編號：2321171
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/minfalunwen/2321171.html
