“街區(qū)制”模式下小區(qū)道路公共化的法律規(guī)制
發(fā)布時間:2018-10-30 14:01
【摘要】:"街區(qū)制"住宅政策的推行,是我國城市規(guī)劃理念革新的產(chǎn)物,其有利于優(yōu)化城市路網(wǎng)布局,促進土地資源有效利用,滿足我國城市化發(fā)展的新需求。但是,"街區(qū)制"住宅政策與我國現(xiàn)有的法律制度相抵牾,必將造成小區(qū)內(nèi)道路私人利用與公共利用的緊張與矛盾。國家對住宅小區(qū)內(nèi)道路使用權(quán)的限制,應(yīng)屬于法律上的準(zhǔn)征收,因此,要求法律對其予以規(guī)制,包括合理界定公共利益范圍、制定正當(dāng)?shù)臏?zhǔn)征收程序,確定公平的補償標(biāo)準(zhǔn)等等,唯有如此,方能有效實現(xiàn)私權(quán)與公權(quán)之間的利益平衡。
[Abstract]:The implementation of "block system" housing policy is the product of innovation of urban planning concept in China. It is beneficial to optimize the layout of urban road network, promote the effective use of land resources and meet the new needs of urbanization development in China. However, the contradiction between the housing policy of "block system" and the existing legal system of our country will inevitably lead to tension and contradiction between private and public use of roads in residential areas. The restriction of the right to use the road in the residential district by the state should belong to the legal quasi-expropriation. Therefore, the law is required to regulate it, including the reasonable definition of the scope of public interest, the establishment of a proper quasi-expropriation procedure, Only in this way can the balance of interests between private right and public right be effectively realized.
【作者單位】: 東華理工大學(xué)文法學(xué)院;西南政法大學(xué)經(jīng)濟法學(xué)院;
【分類號】:D922.3;D923.2
[Abstract]:The implementation of "block system" housing policy is the product of innovation of urban planning concept in China. It is beneficial to optimize the layout of urban road network, promote the effective use of land resources and meet the new needs of urbanization development in China. However, the contradiction between the housing policy of "block system" and the existing legal system of our country will inevitably lead to tension and contradiction between private and public use of roads in residential areas. The restriction of the right to use the road in the residential district by the state should belong to the legal quasi-expropriation. Therefore, the law is required to regulate it, including the reasonable definition of the scope of public interest, the establishment of a proper quasi-expropriation procedure, Only in this way can the balance of interests between private right and public right be effectively realized.
【作者單位】: 東華理工大學(xué)文法學(xué)院;西南政法大學(xué)經(jīng)濟法學(xué)院;
【分類號】:D922.3;D923.2
【相似文獻】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 湯嘯天;王曉晶;;促進利益平衡 實現(xiàn)社會和諧發(fā)展[J];紅旗文稿;2006年22期
2 田必耀;尋找選民與代表的利益平衡[J];人大研究;2002年03期
3 郭劍寒;林梓;;網(wǎng)絡(luò)環(huán)境下的著作權(quán)利益平衡[J];唯實;2006年04期
4 牛犁;王健龍;;從“郵改風(fēng)波”看立法中的利益平衡[J];人大研究;2006年11期
5 馬丹丹;;從利益平衡角度來看國際知識產(chǎn)權(quán)保護的現(xiàn)狀——兼論我國在利益失衡中的出路[J];法制與社會;2007年07期
6 王s,
本文編號:2300201
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/minfalunwen/2300201.html
最近更新
教材專著