【摘要】：隨著我國工業(yè)化進(jìn)程的加快以及科技的發(fā)展,環(huán)境污染和生態(tài)破壞問題日益突出,環(huán)境共同侵權(quán)糾紛的數(shù)量迅速增長(zhǎng)。因環(huán)境共同侵權(quán)具有潛伏性、、復(fù)雜性、間接性等特點(diǎn),導(dǎo)致了其因果關(guān)系難以通過傳統(tǒng)理論來判定,這為法院處理環(huán)境共同侵權(quán)案件造成了巨大的困難,不利于保護(hù)受害人的合法權(quán)益。 本文從四個(gè)方面對(duì)環(huán)境共同侵權(quán)中的因果關(guān)系進(jìn)行了分析。介紹了環(huán)境共同侵權(quán)因果關(guān)系基礎(chǔ)理論,從概念、本質(zhì)和類型三個(gè)方面闡述了環(huán)境共同侵權(quán)的內(nèi)涵,認(rèn)為環(huán)境共同侵權(quán)的本質(zhì)是共同結(jié)果；比較分析了兩大法系傳統(tǒng)侵權(quán)因果關(guān)系并在此基礎(chǔ)上對(duì)環(huán)境共同侵權(quán)因果關(guān)系進(jìn)行了界定,且分析了其特點(diǎn)。分析了環(huán)境共同侵權(quán)因果關(guān)系的判定,通過評(píng)析傳統(tǒng)侵權(quán)因果關(guān)系理論,結(jié)合環(huán)境共同侵權(quán)的特殊性,得出傳統(tǒng)侵權(quán)因果關(guān)系理論在環(huán)境共同侵權(quán)因果關(guān)系判定領(lǐng)域存在適用困難的結(jié)論；考察了國外的因果關(guān)系推定理論,認(rèn)為環(huán)境共同侵權(quán)因果關(guān)系的判定應(yīng)適用因果關(guān)系推定。介紹了我國環(huán)境共同侵權(quán)因果關(guān)系判定的理論、立法現(xiàn)狀以及司法實(shí)踐中存在的問題,論證了舉證責(zé)任倒置的不合理性。最后提出了構(gòu)建環(huán)境共同侵權(quán)因果關(guān)系推定制度,在比較分析法律推定和事實(shí)推定的基礎(chǔ)上,作出正確的立法選擇即法律推定；在司法適用方面,提出了因果關(guān)系推定具體的步驟,并對(duì)不同類型的環(huán)境共同侵權(quán)適用相應(yīng)的推定方法。
[Abstract]:With the acceleration of industrialization and the development of science and technology, the problems of environmental pollution and ecological destruction have become increasingly prominent, and the number of environmental joint infringement disputes has increased rapidly. Due to the latent, complex and indirect characteristics of environmental joint tort, it is difficult to judge its causality through traditional theory, which makes it difficult for the court to deal with environmental joint tort cases. It is detrimental to the protection of the victim's legitimate rights and interests. This paper analyzes the causality in environmental joint tort from four aspects. This paper introduces the basic theory of environmental joint tort causality, expounds the connotation of environmental joint tort from three aspects: concept, essence and type, and holds that the essence of environmental joint tort is a common result. This paper compares and analyzes the traditional tort causality between the two legal systems, defines the causality of environmental joint tort on this basis, and analyzes its characteristics. This paper analyzes the judgment of environmental joint tort causality, through the analysis of traditional tort causality theory, combined with the particularity of environmental joint tort, The conclusion that the traditional tort causality theory is difficult to be applied in the field of environmental joint tort causality judgment is concluded that the causality presumption should be applied in the judgment of environmental joint tort causality. This paper introduces the theory of causality judgment of environmental joint tort in China, the present situation of legislation and the problems existing in judicial practice, and demonstrates the irrationality of the inversion of the burden of proof. Finally, the author puts forward the construction of the presumption system of causality of environmental joint tort. On the basis of comparative analysis of the presumption of law and the presumption of fact, the author makes a correct legislative choice, that is, presumption of law, in the aspect of judicial application. The concrete steps of causality presumption are put forward, and the corresponding presumption methods are applied to different kinds of environmental joint tort.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：北京交通大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號(hào)】：D923

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 王明遠(yuǎn);;日本環(huán)境公害民事賠償法研究[J];北大法律評(píng)論;2001年01期

2 劉英明;;環(huán)境侵權(quán)證明責(zé)任倒置合理性論證[J];北方法學(xué);2010年02期

3 王明遠(yuǎn);德國《環(huán)境責(zé)任法》的基本內(nèi)容和特色介評(píng)[J];重慶環(huán)境科學(xué);2000年04期

4 張浩強(qiáng);論共同環(huán)境侵權(quán)[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2002年02期

5 王社坤;;環(huán)境侵權(quán)因果關(guān)系推定理論檢討[J];中國地質(zhì)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2009年02期

6 俞琳璐;李茂平;;論環(huán)境侵權(quán)因果關(guān)系證明責(zé)任承擔(dān)——對(duì)因果關(guān)系推定與因果關(guān)系證明責(zé)任倒置之區(qū)別的厘清[J];湖南第一師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2012年03期

7 鄧曉東;;論環(huán)境侵權(quán)因果關(guān)系的認(rèn)定——兼評(píng)《侵權(quán)責(zé)任法》第六十六條的理解與適用[J];福建輕紡;2011年02期

8 陳泉生;論環(huán)境共同侵權(quán)行為的危險(xiǎn)責(zé)任[J];福建論壇(經(jīng)濟(jì)社會(huì)版);1996年04期

9 楊素娟;論環(huán)境侵權(quán)訴訟中的因果關(guān)系推定[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;2003年04期

10 焦程程;;試析審判實(shí)務(wù)中環(huán)境侵權(quán)因果關(guān)系的認(rèn)定——兼論因果關(guān)系推定與因果關(guān)系舉證責(zé)任倒置的關(guān)系[J];法制與社會(huì);2012年04期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 葛洪濤;論侵權(quán)法中的因果關(guān)系[D];山東大學(xué);2008年

2 唐忠輝;環(huán)境共同侵權(quán)研究[D];中國政法大學(xué);2011年

，

本文編號(hào)：2290139