言論自由與隱私權(quán)的沖突研究
發(fā)布時間：2018-10-15 12:26
【摘要】：言論自由是公民自由自主的發(fā)表言論、表達思想、主張、見解和觀點的重要權(quán)利,是公民實現(xiàn)自我價值、參與社會管理的重要表達,是公民享有其他權(quán)利和自由的前提和基礎(chǔ)�；ヂ�(lián)網(wǎng)信息技術(shù)的發(fā)展,使公民言論自由的行使有了更加暢通的渠道和廣闊的平臺空間,各種新興媒體尤其是自媒體的產(chǎn)生和發(fā)展也為公民的主體性表達提供了更多的可能和更廣闊的空間。隱私權(quán)是公民個人獨處的權(quán)利,強調(diào)維護公民個人私生活不受打擾,個人空間不受侵犯。現(xiàn)代文明社會的發(fā)展使公民越來越重視個人空間的享有和個人私密的維護。傳播媒介的興盛和網(wǎng)絡(luò)世界的發(fā)展使公民能夠進行越來越廣泛的言論表達,與此同時,公民隱私越來越無處可藏。這就不可避免的產(chǎn)生言論自由和隱私權(quán)之間的沖突。言論自由和隱私權(quán)都是憲法上的基本價值,在構(gòu)建公民完整人格、促進社會文明和社會進步方面都發(fā)揮著重要的積極作用。在解決言論自由和隱私權(quán)之間沖突時,不應(yīng)簡單的作出非此即彼的取舍,而應(yīng)當慎重地進行價值選擇和利益衡量。目前,對于言論自由和隱私權(quán)沖突的解決機制我國法律對此尚無明確規(guī)定,法學理論界也為達成一致看法。筆者對言論、言論自由和隱私、隱私權(quán)等相關(guān)概念和理論的歷史和學理演進進行了梳理,以期達到正確認識和界定相關(guān)概念的內(nèi)涵的目的,明確了言論自由和隱私權(quán)的權(quán)利位階、權(quán)利價值和權(quán)利范圍等問題。隨后,筆者結(jié)合司法實踐和學界現(xiàn)有研究,總結(jié)出了言論自由和隱私權(quán)二者之間沖突的表現(xiàn)、原因等等問題。美國和德國是世界上對言論自由和隱私權(quán)的沖突解決比較成熟的國家,由于不同的歷史文化背景和法律傳統(tǒng),兩國在解決二者沖突時發(fā)展出了不同的規(guī)制原則和解決機制。本文在結(jié)合具體案例對德國、美國等國關(guān)于言論自由與隱私權(quán)沖突解決的相關(guān)制度和原則進行系統(tǒng)介紹的基礎(chǔ)上,結(jié)合對我國相關(guān)立法和司法實踐進行的分析,希冀根據(jù)我國具體的實際情況,探索出符合我國現(xiàn)實國情的二者沖突的解決模式。
[Abstract]:Freedom of speech is an important right for citizens to express their opinions, ideas, opinions and opinions freely and autonomously. It is also an important expression for citizens to realize their own value and participate in social management. It is also the premise and basis for citizens to enjoy other rights and freedoms. With the development of Internet information technology, the exercise of citizens' freedom of speech has more unimpeded channels and broad platform space. The emergence and development of various new media, especially the self-media, also provide more possibilities and wider space for citizens to express their subjectivity. The right to privacy is the right of individual privacy, which emphasizes the protection of private life of citizens and the inviolability of personal space. With the development of modern civil society, citizens pay more and more attention to the enjoyment of personal space and the maintenance of personal privacy. The prosperity of the media and the development of the network world enable citizens to express more and more widely, at the same time, the privacy of citizens is more and more nowhere to hide. This inevitably creates a conflict between freedom of speech and privacy. The freedom of speech and the right to privacy are the basic values of the Constitution and play an important and positive role in the construction of the citizen's complete personality and the promotion of social civilization and progress. In resolving the conflict between freedom of speech and privacy, we should not simply choose one or the other, but carefully choose value and weigh interests. At present, there is no clear stipulation on the conflict between freedom of speech and privacy, and the legal theorists agree. The author combs the historical and theoretical evolution of related concepts and theories, such as speech, freedom of speech, privacy, privacy and so on, in order to achieve the purpose of correctly understanding and defining the connotation of relevant concepts. The rights rank, value and scope of the right to freedom of speech and privacy are clarified. Then, the author summarizes the conflict between freedom of speech and privacy, reasons and so on. The United States and Germany are the mature countries in the world to resolve the conflict between freedom of speech and privacy. Due to different historical and cultural backgrounds and legal traditions, the two countries have developed different regulatory principles and settlement mechanisms in resolving the conflict. Based on the systematic introduction of the relevant systems and principles of conflict resolution between freedom of speech and privacy in Germany, the United States and other countries, this paper analyzes the relevant legislation and judicial practice in China. It is hoped that, according to the actual situation of our country, the solution mode of the conflict between the two should be explored according to the actual situation of our country.
【學位授予單位】：山東大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：D923
本文編號：2272551
[Abstract]:Freedom of speech is an important right for citizens to express their opinions, ideas, opinions and opinions freely and autonomously. It is also an important expression for citizens to realize their own value and participate in social management. It is also the premise and basis for citizens to enjoy other rights and freedoms. With the development of Internet information technology, the exercise of citizens' freedom of speech has more unimpeded channels and broad platform space. The emergence and development of various new media, especially the self-media, also provide more possibilities and wider space for citizens to express their subjectivity. The right to privacy is the right of individual privacy, which emphasizes the protection of private life of citizens and the inviolability of personal space. With the development of modern civil society, citizens pay more and more attention to the enjoyment of personal space and the maintenance of personal privacy. The prosperity of the media and the development of the network world enable citizens to express more and more widely, at the same time, the privacy of citizens is more and more nowhere to hide. This inevitably creates a conflict between freedom of speech and privacy. The freedom of speech and the right to privacy are the basic values of the Constitution and play an important and positive role in the construction of the citizen's complete personality and the promotion of social civilization and progress. In resolving the conflict between freedom of speech and privacy, we should not simply choose one or the other, but carefully choose value and weigh interests. At present, there is no clear stipulation on the conflict between freedom of speech and privacy, and the legal theorists agree. The author combs the historical and theoretical evolution of related concepts and theories, such as speech, freedom of speech, privacy, privacy and so on, in order to achieve the purpose of correctly understanding and defining the connotation of relevant concepts. The rights rank, value and scope of the right to freedom of speech and privacy are clarified. Then, the author summarizes the conflict between freedom of speech and privacy, reasons and so on. The United States and Germany are the mature countries in the world to resolve the conflict between freedom of speech and privacy. Due to different historical and cultural backgrounds and legal traditions, the two countries have developed different regulatory principles and settlement mechanisms in resolving the conflict. Based on the systematic introduction of the relevant systems and principles of conflict resolution between freedom of speech and privacy in Germany, the United States and other countries, this paper analyzes the relevant legislation and judicial practice in China. It is hoped that, according to the actual situation of our country, the solution mode of the conflict between the two should be explored according to the actual situation of our country.
【學位授予單位】：山東大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：D923
【參考文獻】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前3條
1 蘇力;《秋菊打官司》案、邱氏鼠藥案和言論自由[J];法學研究;1996年03期
2 張翔;基本權(quán)利的雙重性質(zhì)[J];法學研究;2005年03期
3 張紅;;20世紀德國人格權(quán)法的演進[J];清華法律評論;2009年01期
，本文編號：2272551
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/minfalunwen/2272551.html
最近更新
教材專著
