【摘要】：隨著時代的進步發(fā)展,人們對于娛樂活動的需求越來越大,而體育賽事作為娛樂活動重要的一塊,自然受到廣大群眾的喜愛和關(guān)注。體育賽事轉(zhuǎn)播成為體育產(chǎn)業(yè)經(jīng)濟效益的重要來源。體育賽事商業(yè)化、職業(yè)化、專業(yè)化成為必然趨勢。再加上現(xiàn)在互聯(lián)網(wǎng)技術(shù)和信息技術(shù)的不斷進步,“互聯(lián)網(wǎng)+體育”模式成為了體育產(chǎn)業(yè)推廣的重要方式。近幾年來,對于體育賽事轉(zhuǎn)播,特別是體育賽事網(wǎng)絡(luò)轉(zhuǎn)播,人們的關(guān)注度越來越高。但隨之而來的,體育賽事轉(zhuǎn)播侵權(quán)事件越來越多,方式也多種多樣。而我國現(xiàn)有的法律體系中沒有專門針對體育賽事轉(zhuǎn)播的法律條文,在此種情況下,當(dāng)出現(xiàn)體育賽事轉(zhuǎn)播侵權(quán)案件時,各地法院法官難以找到明確的法律依據(jù),導(dǎo)致出現(xiàn)相同案件不同判決的尷尬情況發(fā)生,這對于我國體育產(chǎn)業(yè)的發(fā)展以及法制的發(fā)展,都是極其不利的。完善我國體育賽事轉(zhuǎn)播法律保護制度是我國現(xiàn)階段非常急迫的需求。國外對于體育賽事轉(zhuǎn)播的研究已經(jīng)有了一定的成果,像美國,已經(jīng)有一套行之有效的體育賽事轉(zhuǎn)播法律保護制度。當(dāng)然鑒于各個國家的文化、法系的不同,我國當(dāng)然不能完全移植他國的法律法規(guī),但是不妨礙我們可以借鑒他國的規(guī)定。我國在體育賽事轉(zhuǎn)播保護方面,特別是體育賽事網(wǎng)絡(luò)轉(zhuǎn)播方面,尚存在很多的不足,主要表現(xiàn)在體育賽事轉(zhuǎn)播權(quán)益不明,體育賽事節(jié)目的法律屬性尚有爭議,以及《著作權(quán)法》中信息網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳播權(quán)和廣播權(quán)的管轄范圍太過狹窄等。為此,本文試圖通過比較分析國內(nèi)外關(guān)于體育賽事轉(zhuǎn)播法律性質(zhì)相關(guān)學(xué)說理論,闡述個人對于體育賽事轉(zhuǎn)播法律屬性的看法,同時依據(jù)現(xiàn)階段互聯(lián)網(wǎng)環(huán)境下我國主要的體育賽事轉(zhuǎn)播侵權(quán)類型,總結(jié)并分析我國現(xiàn)行相關(guān)方面法律法規(guī)的漏洞,借鑒國外相關(guān)司法實踐和法規(guī),提出完善體育賽事轉(zhuǎn)播法律保護制度的建議。本文共分為三部分,第一部分是體育賽事轉(zhuǎn)播的法律屬性概述,本文首先明確了體育賽事轉(zhuǎn)播的含義和發(fā)展概括,并且闡述網(wǎng)絡(luò)環(huán)境對體育賽事轉(zhuǎn)播的影響。另外,第一部分對于體育賽事和體育賽事節(jié)目的法律屬性進行了分析,結(jié)合國內(nèi)外對于體育賽事轉(zhuǎn)播相關(guān)理論學(xué)說,表明本文作者對于體育賽事轉(zhuǎn)播權(quán)益來源的看法。第二部分是國內(nèi)外體育賽事網(wǎng)絡(luò)轉(zhuǎn)播的法律規(guī)定,首先是介紹了歐盟等國家的體育賽事網(wǎng)絡(luò)轉(zhuǎn)播方面的法律法規(guī)和做法,其次通過總結(jié)我國現(xiàn)階段體育賽事網(wǎng)絡(luò)轉(zhuǎn)播侵權(quán)的類型,分析我國現(xiàn)行相關(guān)法律法規(guī)的現(xiàn)狀和不足。最后一部分,提出完善我國體育賽事轉(zhuǎn)播法律保護制度的建議,主要包括:明確體育賽事轉(zhuǎn)播權(quán)法律地位;確定體育賽事節(jié)目的版權(quán)性;創(chuàng)設(shè)向公眾傳播權(quán);規(guī)范體育賽事轉(zhuǎn)播合同;明確反不當(dāng)競爭法的保護。
[Abstract]:With the development of the times, people need more and more entertainment activities, and sports events, as an important part of entertainment activities, are naturally loved and concerned by the masses. Sports event broadcasting has become an important source of economic benefits of sports industry. The commercialization, professionalization and specialization of sports events have become an inevitable trend. In addition, with the continuous progress of Internet technology and information technology, the mode of "Internet Sports" has become an important way to promote the sports industry. In recent years, people pay more and more attention to the broadcast of sports events, especially the network broadcasting of sports events. But then, the sports event broadcast infringement events more and more, the way is also various. However, the existing legal system of our country does not have any specific legal provisions for the broadcasting of sports events. In this case, when there are infringement cases of sports events, it is difficult for local court judges to find a clear legal basis. It is very unfavorable to the development of sports industry and the development of legal system. It is urgent to perfect the legal protection system of sports event relay in our country. There have been some achievements in the research of sports event broadcasting abroad, such as the United States, there has been an effective system of legal protection of sports event broadcasting. Of course, in view of the different cultures and legal systems of different countries, our country can not transplant the laws and regulations of other countries completely, but it does not prevent us from drawing lessons from the regulations of other countries. In our country, there are still many deficiencies in the protection of the relay of sports events, especially in the network broadcasting of sports events, mainly in the unclear rights and interests of the broadcasting of sports events, the legal attributes of sports events are still controversial, And the jurisdiction of the right of information transmission and broadcasting in copyright Law is too narrow. For this reason, this paper attempts to explain the personal views on the legal attributes of sports events broadcasting by comparing and analyzing domestic and foreign theories about the legal nature of sports events broadcasting. At the same time, according to the main infringement types of sports events broadcast in the current Internet environment, this paper summarizes and analyzes the loopholes of the relevant laws and regulations of our country, and draws lessons from the relevant judicial practices and regulations of foreign countries. Put forward the suggestion of perfecting the legal protection system of sports event broadcasting. This paper is divided into three parts. The first part is an overview of the legal attributes of sports events broadcast. Firstly, this paper clarifies the meaning and development of sports events broadcasting, and expounds the impact of network environment on sports events broadcast. In addition, the first part of the analysis of the legal attributes of sports events and sports events programs, combined with the relevant theory of sports events broadcasting theory, show that the author of this article about the rights and interests of sports events of the source of views. The second part is the domestic and foreign sports events network broadcast laws and regulations, first of all, introduced the European Union and other countries sports events network broadcasting laws, regulations and practices, Secondly, by summing up the types of network relay infringement of sports events in our country, this paper analyzes the current situation and deficiency of relevant laws and regulations in our country. In the last part, the author puts forward some suggestions to perfect the legal protection system of sports event broadcasting in China, including: clarifying the legal status of sports event broadcasting right; determining the copyright of sports event program; creating the right to communicate to the public; To standardize the contract of broadcasting sports events; to make clear the protection of the anti-improper competition law.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：南昌大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D923.41

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 張宏宇;;互聯(lián)網(wǎng)環(huán)境中有關(guān)體育賽事的著作權(quán)保護及建議[J];理論觀察;2016年08期

2 姚鶴徽;;體育賽事網(wǎng)絡(luò)轉(zhuǎn)播法律保護制度的缺陷與完善[J];天津體育學(xué)院學(xué)報;2016年03期

3 王遷;;論體育賽事現(xiàn)場直播畫面的著作權(quán)保護——兼評“鳳凰網(wǎng)賽事轉(zhuǎn)播案”[J];法律科學(xué)(西北政法大學(xué)學(xué)報);2016年01期

4 周沫;;體育賽事節(jié)目的獨創(chuàng)性認定及網(wǎng)絡(luò)轉(zhuǎn)播性質(zhì)研究——新浪訴鳳凰網(wǎng)非法轉(zhuǎn)播中超聯(lián)賽糾紛案評析[J];法制與社會;2016年01期

5 王自強;;體育賽事節(jié)目著作權(quán)保護問題探討[J];知識產(chǎn)權(quán);2015年11期

6 桂爽;;互聯(lián)網(wǎng)環(huán)境下體育賽事節(jié)目的著作權(quán)保護 兼評鳳凰網(wǎng)直播中超賽事案[J];電子知識產(chǎn)權(quán);2015年09期

7 戎朝;;互聯(lián)網(wǎng)時代下的體育賽事轉(zhuǎn)播保護 兼評“新浪訴鳳凰網(wǎng)中超聯(lián)賽著作權(quán)侵權(quán)及不正當(dāng)競爭糾紛案”[J];電子知識產(chǎn)權(quán);2015年09期

8 叢立先;;體育賽事直播節(jié)目的版權(quán)問題析論[J];中國版權(quán);2015年04期

9 姚鶴徽;;論體育賽事類節(jié)目法律保護制度的缺陷與完善[J];體育科學(xué);2015年05期

10 王遷;;論我國《著作權(quán)法》中的“轉(zhuǎn)播”——兼評近期案例和《著作權(quán)法修改草案》[J];法學(xué)家;2014年05期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前5條

1 趙全立;網(wǎng)絡(luò)環(huán)境下體育賽事轉(zhuǎn)播的法律保護[D];華東政法大學(xué);2016年

2 詹學(xué)堂;體育賽事節(jié)目的可版權(quán)性探究[D];華東政法大學(xué);2016年

3 楊子揚;論體育賽事類節(jié)目的著作權(quán)法保護[D];華東政法大學(xué);2016年

4 陳洲;論體育賽事電視轉(zhuǎn)播權(quán)的法律保護[D];蘭州大學(xué);2015年

5 張潔;體育賽事轉(zhuǎn)播權(quán)的著作權(quán)問題研究[D];上海交通大學(xué);2015年

，

本文編號：2271922