【摘要】：當前,在我國發(fā)明專利申請實質(zhì)審查、復(fù)審審查及授權(quán)后的專利無效宣告程序的審查實踐中,作為現(xiàn)有技術(shù),有傳統(tǒng)的專利文獻、期刊論文、個人專著等公開出版物,有合同、銷售、招投標等使用公開,也有隨互聯(lián)網(wǎng)逐漸普及而出現(xiàn)的網(wǎng)絡(luò)證據(jù)等以其他方式公開類證據(jù)。這些證據(jù)種類繁雜、形式多樣、內(nèi)容復(fù)雜,認定較困難,常易造成認定標準不一致情形的出現(xiàn),一定程度上影響了專利局和專利復(fù)審委員會的權(quán)威性。本論文對于中國專利法意義上的現(xiàn)有技術(shù)的認定標準進行了探討,作了分類、歸納,就時間標準、地域標準和為公眾所知標準作了詳細梳理和分析。
[Abstract]:At present, in the examination practice of the substantive examination of patent applications for inventions in China, the review examination and the procedure for declaring patent invalidation after authorization, as the prior art, there are public publications, such as traditional patent documents, periodical papers, individual monographs, etc., and there are contracts, Sales, bidding and other use of public, but also with the gradual popularity of the Internet and other forms of network evidence to disclose evidence. These kinds of evidence are complicated in form, complex in content, difficult to identify, and often cause the appearance of inconsistent standards, which to some extent affect the authority of Patent Office and Patent Reexamination Board. This paper discusses and classifies the standards of the existing technologies in the sense of Chinese patent law, and makes a detailed analysis on the time standard, the regional standard and the standard known to the public.
【作者單位】： 專利復(fù)審委員會光電技術(shù)申訴一處;
【分類號】：D923.42
，

本文編號：2248631