【摘要】：建設工程施工合同具有合同標的特殊性、合同內容紛繁復雜、合同履行期限較長、合同主管部門對施工合同監(jiān)督嚴格等特點，建設工程施工合同糾紛一直是司法實踐中較難處理的一類案件。近年來，，我國建筑市場呈現(xiàn)出混亂的狀態(tài)，混亂的經營行為從未間斷，混亂的市場秩序不僅嚴重制約了建筑市場經濟的發(fā)展以及市場經濟秩序的維護，建設工程的質量事故頻頻發(fā)生，在一定程度上致使大量無效建設工程施工合同的涌現(xiàn)。而各地人民法院在建設工程施工合同具體案件中關于無效的施工合同如何適用相應的法律法規(guī)方面存在著不同的處理方式，從而導致類似的施工合同案件出現(xiàn)不同的裁判結果。針對上述問題的出現(xiàn)，2004年9月22日，最高人民法院審判委員會第1327次會議通過《最高人民法院關于審理建設工程施工合同糾紛案件適用法律問題的解釋》（法釋[2004]14號）。法釋[2004]14號司法解釋第2條規(guī)定：“建設工程施工合同無效，但建設工程經竣工驗收合格，承包人請求參照合同約定支付工程價款的，應予支持�！痹谒痉▽嵺`中，依據該規(guī)定承包人無需具備相應的資質要求，只要工程質量經驗收合格就可以依據合同約定取得相應的工程價款，承包人在物質上沒有損失，也不會為其違法行為付出代價。這種將建設工程中的無效合同當作有效合同處理的規(guī)定，不但沒有保障實際施工人的合法權益，反而會縱容承包人非法轉包、分包和借用資質承包等違法行為，使建筑市場和勞務關系更加混亂。 本文基于合同效力研究的基礎上，圍繞法釋[2004]14號司法解釋第2條，就我國建設工程合同的無效后工程價款支付問題展開深入的研究和綜合分析，再結合價值分析方法，加以判斷和論證。本文的創(chuàng)新之處主要是專門對于建設工程施工領域內的合同無效問題進行分析研究，力爭在建設工程施工合同的無效后工程款支付問題上，基于維護社會正義和保護交易安全的立法本意，為我國建設工程合同的無效后工程款支付問題提供更深層次地理論支撐。
[Abstract]:The construction contract of the construction project has the characteristics of the particularity of the subject matter of the contract, the complexity of the content of the contract, the long term of performance of the contract, the strict supervision of the construction contract by the competent department of the contract, etc. Construction contract dispute has always been a difficult case in judicial practice. In recent years, the construction market of our country presents the chaotic state, the chaotic management behavior never stops, the chaotic market order not only seriously restricts the development of the building market economy and the maintenance of the market economic order. The quality accidents of construction projects occur frequently, to a certain extent, resulting in the emergence of a large number of invalid construction contracts. However, there are different ways of dealing with the invalid construction contract in the specific cases of construction contract, which leads to different adjudication results in similar construction contract cases. In view of the above problems, on September 22, 2004, the 1327 meeting of the Supreme people's Court Judicial Committee adopted the interpretation of the Supreme people's Court on the legal issues applicable to the trial of construction contract disputes (legal interpretation [2004] 14). Article 2 of the judicial interpretation [2004] 14 states: "the construction contract is invalid, but if the construction project has passed the acceptance check upon completion, the contractor shall support the application for payment of the project price with reference to the contract." In judicial practice, according to this stipulation, the contractor does not need to have the corresponding qualification requirement. As long as the project quality passes the acceptance and acceptance, the contractor can obtain the corresponding project price according to the contract agreement, and the contractor has no material loss. Nor do they pay the price for their illegal behavior. Such provisions, which treat invalid contracts in construction projects as valid contracts, not only do not protect the legitimate rights and interests of actual constructors, but instead connive at illegal acts such as illegal subcontracting, subcontracting and borrowing qualifications, etc. Make the construction market and labor relations more chaotic. Based on the study of the validity of the contract, this paper focuses on Article 2 of the judicial interpretation of the legal interpretation [2004] 14, carries out a deep research and comprehensive analysis on the payment of the project price after the invalidation of the construction contract in China, and then combines the method of value analysis. To judge and prove. The innovation of this paper is mainly to analyze and study the invalidation of contracts in the field of construction and construction, and strive to pay the project money after the invalidation of construction contracts. Based on the legislative intention of maintaining social justice and protecting transaction security, this paper provides a deeper theoretical support for the payment of engineering funds after the invalidation of construction contracts in China.
【學位授予單位】：吉林大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：D923.6

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 袁軍;;淺談關于建設工程施工合同無效糾紛案件適用法律問題[J];法制與社會;2010年24期

2 雷智榮;;淺議無效建設工程合同的法律后果[J];消費導刊;2009年11期

3 游國和;;談談無效合同的確認及其法律后果[J];湖南工業(yè)職業(yè)技術學院學報;2010年04期

4 戴南;許海峰;;淺析建設工程施工合同的效力[J];建筑管理現(xiàn)代化;2008年04期

5 徐國良;;無效施工合同歸責的法理和司法實務研究[J];蘭州學刊;2009年S1期

6 馬可健;陳峗;;建設工程合同無效的認定及法律責任解析[J];建筑;2008年11期

7 趙冉初;;論法律適用中的利益衡量[J];吉林省經濟管理干部學院學報;2008年03期

8 汪丁丁,葉航;理性的危機——關于經濟學“理性主義”的對話[J];天津社會科學;2004年01期

9 陳興華,李娜;論利益衡量在民法適用中的展開[J];云南大學學報(法學版);2004年06期

10 龔群;;羅爾斯的正義原則及其理論意義[J];中南林業(yè)科技大學學報(社會科學版);2009年02期

本文編號：2178309