本文選題：婚內(nèi)侵權(quán)行為 + 婚內(nèi)侵權(quán)損害賠償制度��； 參考：《西南政法大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文

【摘要】：權(quán)利意識(shí)的覺醒不僅體現(xiàn)在一般的民事法律關(guān)系中,越來越多的民事主體也開始注重自身在婚姻家庭關(guān)系中的合法權(quán)益。近些年來,夫妻間侵權(quán)損害賠償責(zé)任的案例逐漸增加�！痘橐龇ā冯m歷經(jīng)數(shù)次修訂,但未對(duì)夫妻婚內(nèi)侵權(quán)相關(guān)問題作出規(guī)定,夫妻間侵權(quán)損害賠償案件也是判決不一。現(xiàn)行法律規(guī)定愈發(fā)地不能規(guī)制多樣化的夫妻婚內(nèi)侵權(quán)行為,建立健全夫妻婚內(nèi)侵權(quán)損害賠償制度成為一個(gè)越來越緊迫的問題。然而在學(xué)界和司法實(shí)務(wù)中,對(duì)于婚內(nèi)侵權(quán)行為如何認(rèn)定以及是否有必要建立相應(yīng)的損害賠償制度仍存在較大分歧,故借本文加以探討,以求為該問題的最終解決略陳己見。除引言和結(jié)語外,文章主要分為以下四個(gè)部分。第一部分問題的提出。通過分析典型案例發(fā)現(xiàn),由于缺少法律規(guī)定,對(duì)于夫妻婚內(nèi)侵權(quán)行為的認(rèn)定以及如何適用法律追究侵害人民事責(zé)任存在較大分歧。第二部分分析夫妻婚內(nèi)侵權(quán)行為的概念及類型。侵權(quán)行為是認(rèn)定侵權(quán)損害賠償?shù)目陀^要件。為了明確夫妻婚內(nèi)侵權(quán)行為所負(fù)損害賠償責(zé)任,首先應(yīng)當(dāng)對(duì)婚內(nèi)侵權(quán)行為作實(shí)質(zhì)上的界定,其次以侵權(quán)行為所侵害法益為內(nèi)容,闡述夫妻婚內(nèi)侵權(quán)行為類型,從而對(duì)夫妻侵權(quán)行為有更為系統(tǒng)的認(rèn)識(shí)。第三部分闡述系統(tǒng)建立夫妻婚內(nèi)損害賠償制度的必要性。首先介紹我國規(guī)制夫妻婚內(nèi)侵權(quán)行為的立法現(xiàn)狀,其次對(duì)比分析一般侵權(quán)責(zé)任制度在規(guī)制夫妻婚內(nèi)侵權(quán)行為存在的局限與不足以及離婚損害賠償制度與夫妻婚內(nèi)侵權(quán)損害賠償制度間的區(qū)別,重點(diǎn)闡述在《婚姻法》框架下建立符合我國客觀實(shí)際的夫妻婚內(nèi)侵權(quán)損害賠償制度的必要性。第四部分夫妻婚內(nèi)損害賠償制度立法設(shè)想。對(duì)建立夫妻婚內(nèi)侵權(quán)損害賠償制度提出可行性設(shè)想。諸如配偶權(quán)、婚內(nèi)侵權(quán)行為的財(cái)產(chǎn)與非財(cái)產(chǎn)責(zé)任承擔(dān),特別對(duì)財(cái)產(chǎn)責(zé)任承擔(dān)提出具體立法設(shè)想。并在此基礎(chǔ)上對(duì)文中案例進(jìn)行制度回應(yīng)。
[Abstract]:The awakening of right consciousness is not only reflected in the general civil legal relations, but also more and more civil subjects begin to pay attention to their legitimate rights and interests in marriage and family relations. In recent years, the cases of tort compensation liability between husband and wife have gradually increased. Although the Marriage Law has been revised several times, it has not made provisions on the related issues of the couple's tort within marriage, and the judgment of the tort compensation case between husband and wife is also different. The existing laws and regulations are increasingly unable to regulate the variety of marital tort, and it is becoming more and more urgent to establish and improve the compensation system of marital tort damages. However, in the academic and judicial practice, there are still great differences on how to identify the marital tort and whether it is necessary to establish the corresponding damage compensation system. In addition to the introduction and conclusion, the article is divided into the following four parts. The first part of the question. Through the analysis of typical cases, due to the lack of legal provisions, there are great differences on the identification of marital tort and how to apply the law to investigate the civil liability of violators. The second part analyzes the concept and types of marital tort. Tort is the objective element of confirming tort compensation. In order to clarify the liability for compensation for damage caused by the marital tort, it is necessary to define the marital tort in essence, and then to elaborate the types of the marital tort, taking the legal interests infringed by the tort as the content. Thus there is a more systematic understanding of the tort of husband and wife. The third part expounds the necessity of systematically establishing the marital damage compensation system. First of all, it introduces the current legislative situation of the regulation of marital tort in China. Secondly, it compares and analyzes the limitation and deficiency of the general tort liability system in the regulation of marital tort and the difference between the divorce damage compensation system and the marital tort damage compensation system. This paper focuses on the necessity of establishing the compensation system of marital tort damages in accordance with the objective reality of our country under the framework of Marriage Law. The fourth part is the legislative assumption of the marital damage compensation system. This paper puts forward a feasible idea to establish the marital tort compensation system. Such as spouse right, marital tort property and non-property liability, especially for the bearing of property liability specific legislative ideas. And on the basis of this, the article carries on the system response to the case.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號(hào)】：D923.9;D923

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 張秀玲;;論夫妻侵權(quán)損害賠償——兼評(píng)《婚姻法》第46條[J];蘭州大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2013年01期

2 冉克平;;論夫妻之間的侵權(quán)損害賠償[J];華中科技大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2010年02期

3 王利明;;《侵權(quán)責(zé)任法》的中國特色解讀[J];法學(xué)雜志;2010年02期

4 張華貴;申月霞;;論婚內(nèi)侵權(quán)民事責(zé)任制度的構(gòu)建[J];四川理工學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2007年06期

5 焦少林;;論建立夫妻間侵權(quán)責(zé)任制度[J];現(xiàn)代法學(xué);2006年05期

6 巫昌禎;;進(jìn)一步完善婚姻法的幾點(diǎn)思考——紀(jì)念婚姻法修改五周年[J];金陵法律評(píng)論;2006年01期

7 杜江涌;婚內(nèi)侵權(quán)相關(guān)問題研究[J];西南民族大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文社科版);2005年05期

8 劉引玲;論我國婚姻權(quán)利體系的構(gòu)建[J];法商研究;2005年02期

9 薛寧蘭;我國離婚損害賠償制度的完善[J];法律適用;2004年10期

10 姜虹;夫妻侵權(quán)責(zé)任探微[J];政法論壇;2003年01期

，

本文編號(hào)：2096854