本文選題：商品房買賣合同 + 情事變更原則　； 參考：《浙江大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：近年來,伴隨著我國市場經(jīng)濟(jì)的快速發(fā)展,房地產(chǎn)市場蓬勃發(fā)展,住房需求量增大,商品房交易量逐年上升,由此產(chǎn)生的商品房交易領(lǐng)域的合同糾紛也不斷增加。國家"限購"、"限貸"、"限價"令的頻出,涉房合同糾紛不斷涌現(xiàn),成為社會一大焦點(diǎn)問題。在房產(chǎn)調(diào)控政策出臺后,往往會由于各種限制性的原因,導(dǎo)致合同不能履行或者不能全部履行。此時,買受人往往以房產(chǎn)限購限貸政策為由要求變更甚至解除合同,但對于房產(chǎn)調(diào)控政策是否對其交易產(chǎn)生影響,或是產(chǎn)生了多大的影響,往往不提供絲毫證據(jù)予以佐證,從而引起很大的爭議。限購限貸等房地產(chǎn)政策在司法實(shí)踐中不宜簡單認(rèn)定為《合同法》上的不可抗力或者一般意義上的商業(yè)風(fēng)險,因此,合同當(dāng)事人便拿情事變更作為變更或解除商品房買賣合同的理由。對于情事變更原則在《商品房的解釋》和《合同法》中均沒有條文規(guī)定,僅在《合同法司法解釋二》第二十六條對情事變更原則及其合同履行做了較為原則的規(guī)定。因此,不論在理論界還是司法實(shí)踐中,我國對情事變更原則在商品房買賣合同糾紛中的適用均處于保守和回避的態(tài)度。法院經(jīng)常采取調(diào)解方式結(jié)案的策略。而對于調(diào)解不成的案件,由于沒有明確的法律依據(jù),法院的判決可謂千差萬別。這對于在市場經(jīng)濟(jì)日漸活躍,市場形勢變化莫測的今天,對保護(hù)當(dāng)事人的合法權(quán)益是極為不利和不公平的。本文嘗試從實(shí)踐的角度入手,在情事變更原則的理論分析的基礎(chǔ)上,對調(diào)控政策影響下商品房買賣合同變更或解除能否適用情事變更原則,如何適用以及適用后的法律后果進(jìn)行類型化研究,希望能為司法審判提供些許依據(jù),為得到公正的司法裁判結(jié)果建立基礎(chǔ)。
[Abstract]:In recent years, with the rapid development of China's market economy, the real estate market is booming, the demand for housing is increasing, the volume of commercial housing transactions is rising year by year, and the resulting contract disputes in the field of commercial housing transactions are also increasing. The national "limited purchase", "limit loan", "limit price" order frequently appears, the housing contract dispute emerges unceasingly, becomes a social big focal point question. After the introduction of real estate regulation policy, often due to a variety of restrictive reasons, the contract can not be fulfilled or not fully performed. At this time, buyers often ask for the modification or termination of the contract on the grounds of the property purchase and loan restriction policy, but whether or not the property regulation policy has an impact on its transactions, or how much impact it has, is often not supported by any evidence. This caused great controversy. In the judicial practice, the real estate policy, such as limiting purchase and lending, should not be simply recognized as force majeure in contract law or commercial risk in general sense, therefore, Parties to the contract change as a reason for alteration or rescission of commercial housing sales contract. There is no provision for the principle of circumstance change in the interpretation of Commodity Housing and the contract Law, but in Article 26 of the Judicial interpretation of contract Law, the principle of circumstance change and the performance of the contract are stipulated in a more principled way. Therefore, whether in theory or judicial practice, the application of the principle of change of events in commercial housing sales contract disputes are conservative and evasive attitude. Courts often resort to mediation to close the case. But for the case that mediation fails, because there is no clear legal basis, the judgment of the court can be said to be very different. This is extremely disadvantageous and unfair to protect the legitimate rights and interests of the parties in the increasingly active market economy and unpredictable market situation today. Based on the theoretical analysis of the principle of circumstance change, this paper attempts to apply the principle of change of circumstance to the change or rescission of the contract of sale and purchase of commercial housing under the influence of the policy of regulation and control. In order to provide some basis for judicial trial and to establish the basis for obtaining fair judicial results, how to apply and how to classify the legal consequences after being applied is expected to provide some basis for judicial trial.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：浙江大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D923.6

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前3條

1 沈暉;;情勢變更原則在商品房買賣合同中的適用探析——以國家“房地產(chǎn)新政”為背景[J];中國房地產(chǎn);2013年10期

2 高玉澤;徐忠;;論轉(zhuǎn)型時期中央銀行信貸政策[J];金融研究;2012年07期

3 洪波;;房地產(chǎn)宏觀調(diào)控下房屋買賣糾紛審判實(shí)務(wù)研究——以情勢變更原則的適用為視角[J];人民司法;2010年21期

，

本文編號：2010600