本文選題：專利侵權(quán)抗辯 + 獲取��； 參考：《湘潭大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：案件事實(shí)的認(rèn)定需以證據(jù)為支撐,在專利侵權(quán)判定過(guò)程中,證據(jù)的選擇、收集、篩選和運(yùn)用關(guān)系著抗辯能否成立。被控侵權(quán)人作為民事主體,取證途徑較為單一,無(wú)國(guó)家強(qiáng)制力作為保障,在證據(jù)的獲取與運(yùn)用過(guò)程中主要存在以下障礙:對(duì)抗辯事由認(rèn)識(shí)不清,提供的證據(jù)與事由不相符,無(wú)法支持其抗辯;證據(jù)實(shí)際掌控者可能出現(xiàn)隱匿、銷毀證據(jù)等妨礙證據(jù)獲取的行為,或者證據(jù)由國(guó)家機(jī)關(guān)保存,被控告侵權(quán)人無(wú)權(quán)查閱;電子數(shù)據(jù)等證據(jù)由于其載體的特殊性,導(dǎo)致被控侵權(quán)人難以保存;證據(jù)本身有瑕疵,取證過(guò)程存在輕微不合法,證據(jù)的表現(xiàn)形式存在缺陷,無(wú)法證明證據(jù)的真實(shí)性;證據(jù)之間不能相互印證,對(duì)事實(shí)的認(rèn)定無(wú)法形成完整的證據(jù)鏈以及證據(jù)運(yùn)用過(guò)程中易存在的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)等問(wèn)題。對(duì)相關(guān)司法判例進(jìn)行統(tǒng)計(jì),通過(guò)實(shí)證研究對(duì)證據(jù)抗辯的采納率,分析不同法院在司法實(shí)踐中對(duì)證據(jù)的不同判定,可了解被控侵權(quán)人運(yùn)用抗辯證據(jù)時(shí)應(yīng)當(dāng)注意卻常常被忽視的問(wèn)題。作為專利侵權(quán)訴訟的被控侵權(quán)人可嘗試通過(guò)檢索在先技術(shù)對(duì)比文件獲取無(wú)效或現(xiàn)有技術(shù)/設(shè)計(jì)的證據(jù),支持其抗辯;亦可針對(duì)易刪改、易滅失或需通過(guò)公權(quán)力才可獲取的證據(jù)申請(qǐng)法院調(diào)查取證,確保被控侵權(quán)人能及時(shí)獲取證據(jù);還可針對(duì)電子數(shù)據(jù)等取證過(guò)程與取證結(jié)果的真實(shí)性容易受到質(zhì)疑的證據(jù),對(duì)其進(jìn)行保全公證,通過(guò)中立機(jī)構(gòu)監(jiān)督取證提高證據(jù)證明力;或者對(duì)取證手段或表現(xiàn)形式存在瑕疵的證據(jù),進(jìn)行補(bǔ)正提高證據(jù)能力;另外,還需對(duì)于運(yùn)用過(guò)程中可能存在風(fēng)險(xiǎn)的證據(jù),進(jìn)行使用前的篩選,并注意電子數(shù)據(jù)結(jié)合紙質(zhì)證據(jù)交叉使用。
[Abstract]:The identification of case facts should be supported by evidence. In the process of patent infringement judgment, the choice of evidence, collection, screening and application are related to the establishment of the defense. As a civil subject, the infringers are regarded as a civil subject, and the way of obtaining evidence is relatively simple and without national coercion as the guarantee, there are the following obstacles in the process of obtaining and applying the evidence: confrontation. The evidence is not clearly understood, the evidence provided is not consistent with the cause, and it can not support its defense. The actual control of the evidence may be concealed, the evidence is destroyed, or the evidence is hindering the acquisition of evidence, or the evidence is kept by the state organ, and the infringer is accused of no right to consult; the electronic data, such as the particularity of its carrier, leads to the difficulty of the alleged infringer. In order to preserve it, the evidence itself has flaws, the evidence process has a slight illegality, the manifestation of the evidence is defective, it can not prove the authenticity of the evidence; the evidence can not be confirmed by each other, the fact is not formed, the whole evidence chain is formed and the risk of the evidence in the process of the evidence is used. The relevant judicial precedents are counted, Through the empirical study of the adoption rate of evidence defense and the analysis of the different judgments in the judicial practice of the different courts, it can be understood that the accused should pay attention to the use of the defense evidence but often be ignored. The accused infringer who is a patent infringement lawsuit can try to obtain the invalid or present by retrieving the prior technical contrast documents. There is evidence of Technology / design to support its defense; it can also apply to court investigation and evidence for evidence that can be easily deleted, easily lost or required by public power to ensure that the accused is able to obtain evidence in time; it can also protect the evidence of the evidence of the forensic process of electronic data and the true authenticity of the results of the evidence. Evidence, through the supervision of evidence by neutral institutions to improve evidence proof, or evidence of defects in the means or manifestations of evidence, to improve the ability to improve evidence; in addition, it needs to be screened before use of evidence that may exist in the process of application, and the cross use of electronic data and paper evidence.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：湘潭大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D923.42

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前9條

1 王婧;;由一起專利無(wú)效案談自由心證與證據(jù)規(guī)則的關(guān)系[J];中國(guó)發(fā)明與專利;2013年09期

2 莊武衡;;民事訴訟中電子數(shù)據(jù)的認(rèn)定[J];重慶郵電大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2013年04期

3 朱旭云;;也談現(xiàn)有技術(shù)抗辯的適用——從現(xiàn)有技術(shù)抗辯法律制度本源出發(fā)[J];知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2011年07期

4 郭曉立;張曉霞;;專利無(wú)效案中的證據(jù)認(rèn)定和舉證責(zé)任分配[J];中國(guó)發(fā)明與專利;2011年08期

5 翟文峰;張炳生;;現(xiàn)有技術(shù)抗辯的抗辯模式與對(duì)比對(duì)象[J];北京理工大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2011年02期

6 曹新明;;現(xiàn)有技術(shù)抗辯研究[J];法商研究;2010年06期

7 翟文峰;張炳生;;現(xiàn)有技術(shù)抗辯的對(duì)比標(biāo)準(zhǔn)[J];中國(guó)礦業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2010年03期

8 劉品新;;電子取證的法律規(guī)制[J];法學(xué)家;2010年03期

9 _5^懔，

本文編號(hào)：2003258